That’s a start, though the THD vs Frequency vs Power is very hard to read. All other graphs are not biased to 0 dB, making them also harder to read. He will improve no doubt
That’s a start, though the THD vs Frequency vs Power is very hard to read. All other graphs are not biased to 0 dB, making them also harder to read. He will improve no doubt
This is a very poor result, really.However, even with the impedance profiles used with 20 ohm peaks, the benefits of such measurements are evident. In the tested WiiM Amp. A 0.6dB SPL increase is observed in the presence range of 2-4kHz, which can result in an aggressive perceived sound:
This is a very poor result, really.
Compared to objective reality maybe. On the other hand, find another streamer with similar power, size and features for a comparable price…?Compared with…?
Compared to objective reality maybe. On the other hand, find another streamer with similar power, size and features for a comparable price…?
Random,dependable results will never be close to perfect,in fact it will be far.My point.
Indeed, given usage, this may not be very poor at all.
In some instances, for example with easy to drive speakers at a short listening distance, it may be close to perfect.
I’m being a tad provocative, but I’ll just throw it out there.
Compared with…?
PFFB is key to acceptable performance in a class-D amp , this gives random results depending on your speaker?With any solid state or PFFB-enabled amp.
Also would not a correct PFFB also improve many others aspects of the performance like thd ?
PFFB is key to acceptable performance in a class-D amp , this gives random results depending on your speaker?
And as frequency response deviations are one of the things most audible to humans ?
It’s more important to get this right rather than 0,01% or 0.001% ThD which no one hears .
So it fails where it actually matters most , in a potentially audible part of its performance?
Power and current may very well be good enough for a small setup where no one is playing very loud .
Also would not a correct PFFB also improve many others aspects of the performance like thd ?
You got the red bold wrong,this has nothing to do with power.Your first sentence says this product is unacceptable. Many would beg to differ.
Both Amir and Erin’s reviews suggest the issues discussed are only really a problem in large rooms/longer seating distances/tough to drive speakers.
Most of the issues are at over 10 kHz. I’m not sure more than half us (the older half) can hear a 1 dB deviation between 10 kHz and 20 kHz.
Neither random, nor casually audible at about ±1dB change with usual speaker loads:PFFB is key to acceptable performance in a class-D amp , this gives random results depending on your speaker?
It is random as each speaker has different phase/impedance. It is random because it is not safe to say how it will react with each speaker. And yes, with this exact load (Erins complex load test) it results in +/- 1 dB. But had the Zmax been twice as high and at a different frequency? Has it had two impedance peaks in the mid/high frequency range what would the resulting response be?Neither random, nor casually audible at about ±1dB change with usual speaker loads:
View attachment 351008
In the face of room acoustics, mastering quality, and unit-to-unit loudspeaker variation, that's meaningless.
So yes, load dependency is not nice from a theoretical standpoint, but it's inconsequential in practice.
yes 0,5 to 1dB in quite broad range in the direct sound is audible . if it where a very narrow spike not so much .It is random as each speaker has different phase/impedance. It is random because it is not safe to say how it will react with each speaker. And yes, with this exact load (Erins complex load test) it results in +/- 1 dB. But had the Zmax been twice as high and at a different frequency? Has it had two impedance peaks in the mid/high frequency range what would the resulting response be?
It's not so much the single cases that are bothersome as it is the uncertainty how it will react with my (your) speakers. As such, as we know it can be easily mitigated by design, why don't we strive for that instead of focusing on a combined THD+N value that are waay below audible?
Your first sentence says this product is unacceptable. Many would beg to differ.
Both Amir and Erin’s reviews suggest the issues discussed are only really a problem in large rooms/longer seating distances/tough to drive speakers.
Most of the issues are at over 10 kHz. I’m not sure more than half us (the older half) can hear a 1 dB deviation between 10 kHz and 20 kHz.
Neither random, nor casually audible at about ±1dB change with usual speaker loads:
View attachment 351008
In the face of room acoustics, mastering quality, and unit-to-unit loudspeaker variation, that's meaningless.
So yes, load dependency is not nice from a theoretical standpoint, but it's inconsequential in practice.
Most of the issues are at over 10 kHz. I’m not sure more than half us (the older half) can hear a 1 dB deviation between 10 kHz and 20 kHz.