• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Collaborate on the "New to the ASR Forum FAQ" here

kemmler3D

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Messages
3,008
Likes
5,606
Location
San Francisco
Per some discussion on the "whence ABX?" thread, I figured I could kick off the FAQ we envisioned. Part of the idea is heading off the "But I definitely heard a difference between..." newbie threads without creating a bad experience for new, enthusiastic, but perhaps misguided users. I think a FAQ can go a bit beyond that, though. My thinking is that it can introduce people to ASR and some of the core concepts in currency around here, but it doesn't need to go in-depth on actual audio concepts - it should introduce them and link directly to topical further reading.

I've started a very rough and cursory document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wwLBC_GEny9eMhyLJSzb-yxRi37BIX2G7Cjee76oAIw/edit?usp=sharing

Please feel free to add questions, answers, or edit ones that are already there. Once the contributors feel satisfied and Amir approves, we can publish it as its own thread. In the future, we can link to the FAQ instead of repeating the same stuff about ABX, blind listening, the value of measurements, etc.
 

dkinric

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Messages
666
Likes
1,446
Location
Virginia, USA
This has been attempted before
 

ahofer

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
4,947
Likes
8,694
Location
New York City
I think it should be customary to link Amir's videos on various topics within the FAQ. In a sense, he's got a head start on it.
 

NTK

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
2,656
Likes
5,819
Location
US East
This has been attempted before
And this one.
 

MAB

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
2,134
Likes
4,779
Location
Portland, OR, USA
I figured I could kick off the FAQ we envisioned.
I would love an easy to reference FAQ, would be great to have examples.
Well let me start:

Q: Is "break in" or "burn in" valid for audio components?

A: Aside from initially testing functionality, no.
This is a good one I think. I have been thinking of taking T/S measurements on a brand new woofer and tweeter drivers that I have, and measure the changes (or lack of change) as I break it in. I am not clear on if that has been done here, perhaps I missed it in my searches.

This has been attempted before
For me this thread is too long and is (as OP states) a manifesto. I need something that looks more like a card-catalog or searchable citations. Perhaps I'm not good at using the search tools here...
 

DonR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 25, 2022
Messages
2,968
Likes
5,611
Location
Vancouver(ish)
And this one.
Attempted many times but scattered all over the forums.

Ideally, every answer should have a link to at least one study or paper that supports the answer.
 

tomelex

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
990
Likes
572
Location
So called Midwest, USA
Well let me start:

Q: Is "break in" or "burn in" valid for audio components?

A: Aside from initially testing functionality, no.

A YES or NO answer is usually not a good idea, there will always be fringes, for example, proven fact that power tubes vary over the first 100 hours before they settle down to their slow steady decline over time due to cathode emissions. "the more I learn about something the less i "know" should be a caution for all of us.
 

DonR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 25, 2022
Messages
2,968
Likes
5,611
Location
Vancouver(ish)
A YES or NO answer is usually not a good idea, there will always be fringes, for example, proven fact that power tubes vary over the first 100 hours before they settle down to their slow steady decline over time due to cathode emissions. "the more I learn about something the less i "know" should be a caution for all of us.
I agree there will always be fringe cases. Do we address those or do we stick with mainstream (i.e. 99.99% of consumer equipment) for the sake of clarity and brevity? Perhaps we can use qualifiers such as "in most cases, no" but then that invites the element of doubt.
 
OP
kemmler3D

kemmler3D

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Messages
3,008
Likes
5,606
Location
San Francisco
A condescending note to "golden ears" definitely doesn't do anything to help people acclimate to the forum, but the FAQ contained in the manifesto looks helpful. I think maybe it should be in actual Q & A format, and labeled as a FAQ though. I am not sure people with tedious / old questions will immediately (or ever) seek out something marked "manifesto". IMO "FAQ for new users" should be both attractive and intuitive enough to contain / preempt some of the "But I definitely heard the cables!" posts.
 

TimF

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
491
Likes
874
I don't think people easily conceive how radical and unusual it is to make product selection rational. In fact, people resist it. We enjoy the illusions regarding products and their performance, and regarding so called product quality, and regarding the status and exclusiveness of expensive products. It is an elaborate construct that is the very commercial air we breathe. People who don't really care much for music get into audio equipment for various purposes. People buy remarkably expensive performance cars to commute in heavy traffic. 300 hp cars crawling along at 15 to 35 miles per hour on I-5 or I15. ARS is going against the grain of marketing that is a very powerful and large industry. How do you convince someone that their perception has been manipulated, and manipulated to such a degree that it takes effort and work to counter the deceptions.
 
Last edited:
OP
kemmler3D

kemmler3D

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 25, 2022
Messages
3,008
Likes
5,606
Location
San Francisco
@Jim Taylor I think in most cases we would need to link the newbies to the FAQ. But, it would save time in typing out the same answer over and over, that's what FAQs are usually for. We don't have a great resource for that just yet.

@TimF Yes and no... Consumer Reports has been chugging along for decades on a similar rational-consumer basis. RTINGs is pretty successful and mainstream. There's a market for this stuff, not like ASR is quickly fading into obscurity either. In general I think people are very skeptical of "marketing", but they may only notice it's "marketing" once it's pointed out to them.
 
Last edited:

Waxx

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2021
Messages
1,931
Likes
7,688
Location
Wodecq, Hainaut, Belgium
Well let me start:

Q: Is "break in" or "burn in" valid for audio components?

A: Aside from initially testing functionality, no.
Only on things that use heat (cfr tubes that need to stabilise) or mechanical movement (speaker drivers) but in general the break in is very short (especially for speakers where in general it's less than a few minutes, and mostly only a few seconds), a few wel documented exceptions not counted (like raw Mark Audio drivers). The rest is bullshit. And break in can be measured (like is done quiet a few times with mark audio drivers on diyaudio.com) when it's needed, no magic hocus pocus is needed.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,521
Likes
37,050
I don't think people easily conceive how radical and unusual it is to make product selection rational. In fact, people resist it. We enjoy the illusions regarding products and their performance, and regarding so called product quality, and regarding the status and exclusiveness of expensive products. It is an elaborate construct that is the very commercial air we breathe. People who don't really care much for music get into audio equipment for various purposes. People buy remarkably expensive performance cars to commute in heavy traffic. 300 hp cars crawling along at 15 to 35 miles per hour on I-5 or I15. ARS is going against the grain of marketing that is a very powerful and large industry. How do you convince someone that their perception has been manipulated, and manipulated to such a degree that it takes effort and work to counter the deceptions.
Yes, people don't like effort and work. Communicating by stories is the easiest way or if you wish fables. Marketing is commercialized fables. Also when people are "rational" they like it to be easy. Simple numbers. The reason ASR gets accused of enshrining SINAD. Why horsepower sells cars or riding lawn mowers or farm tractors. Or why megapixels sells cameras.

I am not against FAQ's, but even the idea of reading thru FAQ's is something most won't do.

I wonder if we could construct something different. A handful of stories to illustrate a few key concepts. Pattern the character after common subjectivist patterns of belief and describe how one did or could experience audio in a way to enlighten about bias, and fallible human senses. Perhaps combine it with a few files for download to experience it yourself if you wished. Or linked to online sources to experience a few things. In short we need to create commercials for ASR, and some of those are of a product comparison type. Like the one where two kids play in the mud and one set of clothes is washed in generic detergent and another is washed in Tide.
 
Last edited:

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,223
Likes
17,799
Location
Netherlands
Yes, people don't like effort and work. Communicating by stories is the easiest way or if you wish fables. Marketing is commercialized fables. Also when people are "rational" they like it to be easy. Simple numbers. The reason ASR gets accused of enshrining SINAD. Why horsepower sells cars or riding lawn mowers or farm tractors. Or why megapixels sells cameras.
But there is a catch here: they all try to sell a product, and none of them care for the truth, none of them are actually informative.
I am not against FAQ's, but even the idea of reading thru FAQ's is something most won't do.
That is indeed not what it should be in my mind. It should rather be a resource one can link to or copy past from whenever one of the standard questions comes up.
I wonder if we could construct something different. A handful of stories to illustrate a few key concepts. Pattern the character after common subjectivist patterns of belief and describe how one did or could experience audio in a way to enlighten about bias, and fallible human senses. Perhaps combine it with a few files for download to experience it yourself if you wished. Or linked to online sources to experience a few things. In short we need to create commercials for ASR, and some of those are of a product comparison type. Like the one where two kids play in the mud and one set of clothes is washed in generic detergent and another is washed in Tide.
I really hate that: using what you despise to try to convince somebody. There is nothing wrong with stories. They pique interest. But the end goal should be to educate. I don't want people to just believe me because I have a nice story to tell. I want them to actually understand, and apply that knowledge next time.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
5,836
Likes
5,761
It will be handy to link to people who ask the same questions all the time.
The big question is who will answer this questions in the first place.

People who used to write here that knew stuff in depth without been fanbois or biased against prices for example seem to write less and less.
It matters a lot who answers.
 

Rednaxela

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 30, 2022
Messages
2,051
Likes
2,673
Location
NL
Q: Why is the word science in your forum name?
A: […]

Q: How can you be both passionate about audio and think that, for instance, all top-measuring DACs sound the same?
A: […]

Q: I prefer DAC A over DAC B. Is there something wrong with me?
A: […]

Q: Are there, in your view, limits to the upgradeability of an audio setup?
A: […]

Q: If redbook is good enough, does that mean no-one here enjoys high res audio?
A: […]

Q: My speakers would never get high marks according to the criteria you apply in your reviews. Still I think they sound amazing. What does this say about your speaker reviews?
A: […]

Q: Do I have to back up literally everything I state here about something with data?
A: […]

Q: I love vinyl and tube gear. Can I happily join this forum?
A: […]

Q: I love op-amp rolling. Is there a place for me here?
A: […]

Q: Do you guys ever discuss at all how something sounds?
A: […]
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,521
Likes
37,050
But there is a catch here: they all try to sell a product, and none of them care for the truth, none of them are actually informative.

That is indeed not what it should be in my mind. It should rather be a resource one can link to or copy past from whenever one of the standard questions comes up.

I really hate that: using what you despise to try to convince somebody. There is nothing wrong with stories. They pique interest. But the end goal should be to educate. I don't want people to just believe me because I have a nice story to tell. I want them to actually understand, and apply that knowledge next time.
My background is more or less in engineering. I hate commercializing and propaganda. Not uncommon in that. But you have to hook someone's interest before you can educate them. Marketing works like it or not. Fables work like it or not. Stories are what people find accessible with ease. Even engineers more than they want to let on.

Rednaxela's post is a good list of FAQ questions to start with. Another section with stories or tales to illustrate wouldn't be necessarily a bad thing either.
 
Top Bottom