• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Collaborate on the "New to the ASR Forum FAQ" here

D

Deleted member 48726

Guest
A YES or NO answer is usually not a good idea, there will always be fringes, for example, proven fact that power tubes vary over the first 100 hours before they settle down to their slow steady decline over time due to cathode emissions. "the more I learn about something the less i "know" should be a caution for all of us.
This! -This is so important if the "science" in Audio Science Review is to be taken seriously.

If there is even a tiny bit of uncertainty of a question it should not ever be a yes or a no. That includes fringes.
 

Mnyb

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
2,741
Likes
3,818
Location
Sweden, Västerås
In marketing we would call this case studies, or testimonials, if the story is told from the first person. This is useful to convince people when they can see themselves in the "protagonist" of the story. However, it also requires someone to be interested enough in the product (in this case, an objectivist approach to audio) to read the damn thing. I think a FAQ and case studies / testimonials can coexist, but they serve different purposes.

The FAQ is to save existing members from re-writing the same responses over and over, and to save new members from getting testy responses from old members who are tired of writing the same responses over and over - beyond that, I think we are talking about diverging objectives that may be better served by other types of content.

There is a broader point here - if someone has already spent real money on audio-woo gear... they are going to be a very tough nut to crack because it's hard to admit a mistake, especially a costly mistake, and likely some of their personal pride is wrapped up in that decision as well. We shouldn't put a lot of effort into trying to convince those people. Very low yield.

The target market for new ASR users is the person who is *thinking* about dropping >$200 on gear, but hasn't yet, and may have been exposed to some of the SBAF or AG style nonsense. Someone who is still looking for answers, not someone who thinks they've found them. The FAQ could be very helpful in steering those people in the right direction.


Bingo - we are dealing with potential scope creep in this thread. Let's focus on cataloging the common questions and answers to save us all some keystrokes.


Would definitely be good to link to a glossary, or if one doesn't exist already, create one and link to it from the FAQ.



Probably no one individual is going to volunteer to own the FAQ for eternity. However, anyone posting on ASR who knows their stuff has time to contribute to it, by definition. So from time to time the mods should review the FAQ and make sure it's up to date, and if not, ask for assistance from knowledgeable members for edits.
One can start a faq with very basic things that not going to change and hence needs almost no rewriting or only a touch up now and then.

How speaker cables work.

Various stuff about sampling that held up since the 1930-1950 ? I think the theoretical ground was complete then ?
It includes the dreaded time resolution q about 44.1kHz that’s is not 1/44.1 . And no, filters are not optional it does not work without them

Myths about negative feedback ?

Our hear
 

bodhi

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 11, 2022
Messages
999
Likes
1,437
If there is even a tiny bit of uncertainty of a question it should not ever be a yes or a no. That includes fringes.

Like that invisible pink unicorns maybe living in your attic? We don't live our normal life according to that rule: if certain things are so impossibly unlikely to be true you treat them as not true, you are even betting your life on it, on daily basis.

This forum is for discussing audio in the real world, not debating the concept of truth in philosophical context. Many of the subjectivist claims are about the same level of plausability as aforementioned pink unicorns so how about just consider them as false?
 
D

Deleted member 48726

Guest
Like that invisible pink unicorns maybe living in your attic? We don't live our normal life according to that rule: if certain things are so impossibly unlikely to be true you treat them as not true, you are even betting your life on it, on daily basis.

This forum is for discussing audio in the real world, not debating the concept of truth in philosophical context. Many of the subjectivist claims are about the same level of plausability as aforementioned pink unicorns so how about just consider them as false?
I've not claimed what you say.

It's just that if you don't measure for certain things or with a certain setup that you know can't uncover all fringes, you have to keep that uncertainty or asterix that it may not always be the absolute truth for the user.

Please keep this civil. It's not very fitting for the "science" in Audio Science Review to have outbursts like that nor stubbornly insist that everything is known.
 
Top Bottom