- Thread Starter
- #41
Suggestions, should only be allowed to use the words he can spell correctly with nothing more than a pen and paper .
Suggestions, should only be allowed to use the words he can spell correctly with nothing more than a pen and paper .
Lack of any? Are you serious?Sorry if I'm changing the trust here, but the biggest issue for those coming from subjectivity to measurements is lack of any measurement or statements or lines or zones on the graphs of audibility.
Lines on graphs of accepted and expected values of audibility so one does not have peruse a ton of lit or get PhD in acoustic science.Lack of any? Are you serious?
Or are you actually meaning to ask that ASR have a pinned, closed thread at the top of the forums that lays out the limits of human perception of audio-gear-related measurements?
For the metrics you asked, that is not a realistic request. For example, Geddes has shown that the distribution of harmonics in a THD measurement will change its audibility. And Toole has shown that the audibility of a given deviation from flat in a frequency response curve will depend on the reason for the deviation.Lines on graphs of accepted and expected values of audibility so one does not have peruse a ton of lit or get PhD in acoustic science.
Conservative grey bands. So the measurements don't reveal it all and some things can be heard by golden ears? I'm saying where it makes sense, such as SINAD over/under (80?).For the metrics you asked, that is not a realistic request. For example, Geddes has shown that the distribution of harmonics in a THD measurement will change its audibility. And Toole has shown that the audibility of a given deviation from flat in a frequency response curve will depend on the reason for the deviation.
If reality is nuanced, it is wrong to demand broad-brush truths.
I agree, I think differently from an English speaker: the construction of the sentence and the concept often reverse the result. The ways of saying are different and if I try to use the “colloquial”, disaster, meaning and sentence totally different. The translator does the rest, very often presenting words or sentences that are meaningless to me. I have to rearrange them with my poor school English….However, however, I have an advantage: I catch all those of you who have the technical commentary written by AI. Yes, that is always translated perfectly into my language, so it was not written by hand but by the “computer” that recognizes it…Sono d'accordo. Penso anche (dall'osservazione dei thread qui) che molti dei nostri membri che non utilizzano un'app di traduzione avanzata dovrebbero riconsiderare e farlo. Le differenze di significato (chiamatelo "sfumatura" se volete) tra parole e frasi diverse possono essere più sorpanti di quanto alcune persone pensino. Le differenze nel fraseggio (e le diverse ipotesi) possono rovinare anche le discussioni più ben intenzionate.
Isn't it intuitively obvious that broad-brush measures (and those you listed are such) aren't necessarily sufficiently granular?So the measurements don't reveal it all ...
No. That is not what I said or implied....and some things can be heard by golden ears?
That's what I remember from my introductory psych class in 1965 or so. Leon Festinger.I really, really hate to upset you, but it seems you have incorrectly defined and used the term cognitive dissonance.
Using an AI search since your post seemed incorrect and I know little about the subject, gives the following description of cognitive dissonance which is clearly at odds with your usage of the term in your post. Cognitive dissonance seems to be discomfort from internal conflicts within ones self, not conflict with others.
"Cognitive dissonance is a feeling of discomfort that occurs when a person's beliefs, values, or actions don't align. It can also happen when someone holds two or more conflicting beliefs." From Google.
Absolutely right!ASR can act as a powerful catalyst for cognitive dissonance
Maintaining a healthy constructive atmosphere can be very challenging.
In consideration of big words…Suggestions, should only be allowed to use the words he can spell correctly with nothing more than a pen and paper .
Sartre would be proud of him (he used to include a dictionary for his new-found terms at his books which along with his dense content made translation to other languages a nightmare, hence the epic debates amongst scholars back then)
I begrudge any contention concerning the inadequacy of collegial support in said endeavor.Shorter words, fewer words, and simplistic pictographs are replacing complex thoughts and emotions in human communications. We are devolving... Thomas is singlehandedly trying to reverse the decline by using longer and longer words![]()