• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Class D amp long term reliability

The point I'm making is that a major killer of audio equipment is heat.

Yes lower spec components/modules can have lasting performance so long as temperature is kept within design limits.

Electrolytic capacitors have electrolyte liquid sealed inside.

Rating at 105°C is worst case life expectancy, usually a conservative rating.

Run them at say 40°C max, keep the caps away from hot stuff, adequately heatsink the amplifier to spec sheet, allow good convection cooling too, don't put them in high ambient, and fan cool the design, if necessary.

Temperature monitoring is easy/cheap to do these days, as is silent (variable) fan cooling.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
I also remember somebody asking if putting plate amplifiers into a subwoofer box is detrimental to reliability.

Yes, if they are allowed to overheat.
What about vibration? Seems like the only effect it could have on reliability would be a shorter life span.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Plate amplifiers inside a subwoofer (or any other enclosure) are more attacked by missing a own enclosure than overheat (if I interpret the reviews I've seen correctly).
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Was Salt suggesting the reason for seperated enclosure was to do with vibration affecting the module's physical integrity?

Maybe, but not so much as overheating in my book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
A separate enclosure does not only prevent an external vibration but can serve for severe ventilation. Hypex, for example, have their own examples, how to adjust their plate amps (they do have openings on top and on the feet).
 
A separate enclosure does not only prevent an external vibration but can serve for severe ventilation. Hypex, for example, have their own examples, how to adjust their plate amps (they do have openings on top and on the feet).
Monitor internal temp in extreme use.

NCMP are designed to be used 'flat', vertical, or worse, upside down, compromises dissipation.

There is a fact I learnt from Hypex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
If mounting a vertical NCMP based plate amplifier in a sub, Fusion for example, make sure extra ventilation is provided.

The vents on Fusion will not be adequate if you really want to push it, Salt'n'Pepa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Can it be that:
1) being less expensive, sales of MPs are or have been greater than those of any specific “higher end model” ?
2) MPs have been around for a longer time and therefore it is reasonable to have more anecdotal reports of problems?
or, I presume less likely
3) people who can afford “higher end models” are less likely to report problems, particularly to social media?
4) people who purchase the less expensive equipment are less likely to worry about how carefully they treat them?

I could go on, but the point is that there are many possible data collection biases that can come into play when the data are anecdotal.

So we go and circle back to other comments to support our arguments.

Note that scenario 3 and 4 are not so less likely to me as such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
I view reliability somewhat differently than perhaps a few here. In my mind, reliability is not incidental or accidental. It occurs when that quality is seen as a primary and desirable characteristic. In other words, you don't design for efficiency, or effectiveness, and have reliability just happen. You have to design for reliability at the same time as efficiency or effectiveness, and then see how efficient you can make the device, or how effective it can become without reduction of that necessary reliability.

I don't see that happening today. Not in audio, and not in anything else. Jim Taylor
Why was this guy deleted, if not a silly question?
 
Back
Top Bottom