Is there anything in those measurements to write home about. At this price point?
I think not!
www.soundstagenetwork.com
I think not!
No doubt it'l get raving Reviews then i guessSwiching PSU,op-amps,etc for this result.
They better have stayed at linear PSU and couple of big toroids.
This one does not tick anyones boxes,either objectivist or subjectivist.
View attachment 400531
(picture link)
By whom?I don't know anyone from either camp who would like that.No doubt it'l get raving Reviews then i guess![]()
By the usually suspects, aka all so called "high quality" high end magazines.By whom?I don't know anyone from either camp who would like that.
The class A camp,etc will detest it,no linear PSUs,no discrete outputs but op-amps,heatshinks looks like it's there for the looks,etc.
The objectivist camp while would appreciate an efficient switching PSU and opamps which is trivial to get a good measuring result would be disappointed too.
All it's left is Chord's fans (and they are justified by the objectively good performance of the DACs,yes,but this thing... )
There are all shorts.By the usually suspects, aka all so called "high quality" high end magazines.
By the usually suspects, aka all so called "high quality" high end magazines.
Or the Benchmark!There are all shorts.
But unless some tens of Kg of copper is added even the most absurd of those cannot justify it as entry-level hiend machine.
Let alone compare it with a nice measuring Mcintosh for example,or god-forbid with a Halcro.
They probably made a bet on this "dynamic adjusted,unique design" output as a selling point.Or the Benchmark!
I'm really at a loss here, how can this happen?, don't they measure their gear, are they so convinced of their own superiority?