• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

Rate this product:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 358 88.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 13 3.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther

    Votes: 7 1.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 28 6.9%

  • Total voters
    406

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,991
Likes
36,199
Location
The Neitherlands
At 325 hz? Not likely. I know it is a log scale, but it looks short of 360 hz.

What is weird about that particular plot is that there appear to be no 1kHz harmonics. All of the harmonics appear not to be 1kHz multiples.
All other plots show expected harmonics. Something is fishy there.
 

xaviescacs

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
1,499
Likes
1,977
Location
La Garriga, Barcelona
Wow! Still three people voted for great :D
smoke-cigarettes.gif
The poll just says "Rate this product", not "Rate this product according to its measured performance".
 

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,114
Likes
12,303
Location
London
Enlightening as always, despite dubious integrity Rob Watts’ designs are usually competent, clearly not in this case.
Keith
 

sq225917

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
1,369
Likes
1,637
Surely there must be something on the underside of that pcb? Like fantastic thermally controlled clock circuits, digital out buffers that are immune to PS noise, thighs of sun tanned virgins for rolling the cigars that Rob Watt is smoking when he's not on crack?

It's almost as if ZF are given about the quality of the digital outputs.
 

BeerBear

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
264
Likes
252
What's the theoretical benefit of upsampling?
Better anti-imaging filtering compared to your DAC (at the cost of some extra latency).
But you can upsample for free in software, so I don't really see the point of devices like these. Well, I guess it could make sense if you're not using a computer for playback...
 

chris719

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
373
Likes
423
Simple 2 layer board with non audio grade caps .....
How can you tell? You don’t even know what you’re looking at. It’s almost certainly a 4 or 6 layer board because on the bottom side is a Xilinx Artix 7 FPGA. You can’t route one on a 2 layer board, period. Audio grade caps are a scam and I see appropriate components here.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,690
Likes
37,412
Actually, I voted "Not terrible" :cool:. If it does nothing, it can't be poor. :p There is always room for different opinions, states of mind and purposes. :)
Different opinions for sure. If it does nothing for $1 million, I'd rate it poor. I mean $5k can treat your room really well, or buy lots of music or concert tickets, or a really good speaker upgrade, etc., etc.
 

xaviescacs

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
1,499
Likes
1,977
Location
La Garriga, Barcelona
Better anti-imaging filtering compared to your DAC (at the cost of some extra latency).
But you can upsample for free in software, so I don't really see the point of devices like these.
That looks like a marketing claim from the company. ;) What about a difference in the final analog output?
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,690
Likes
37,412
That looks like a marketing claim from the company. ;) What about a difference in the final analog output?
No it really gives better steeper anti-imaging, but so can software upsamplers. So yes, they do change the analog output.
 

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,013
Likes
6,013
Does anyone care to hypothesize about why the Topping DAC was so much worse? Is that due to the massive jitter that the SPDIF receiver just can’t deal with?
Isn't the jitter rejection one of the virtues of a good DAC?
Something is very wrong here.
 

BeerBear

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
264
Likes
252
What about a difference in the final analog output?
The difference is there. You can also see it in this review.
But the real question is whether it provides an audible improvement or not. And that's not something we can answer definitely. Every person can answer it for themselves with a blind test.

EDIT: Of all the things to "worry about" in an audio setup this one ranks very very low, to the point that IMO you can safely ignore it. But I remain open-minded in case someone eventually proves that there is an audible benefit.
 
Last edited:

xaviescacs

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
1,499
Likes
1,977
Location
La Garriga, Barcelona
Different opinions for sure. If it does nothing for $1 million, I'd rate it poor. I mean $5k can treat your room really well, or buy lots of music or concert tickets, or a really good speaker upgrade, etc., etc.
I'm always unsure about taking cost into account when answering this polls. For the majority of people, if cost is a variable, almost everything tested on this forum is too expensive and useless. I'm inclined towards not taking price into consideration (when voting xD), it's a relative thing. Some homeless bankrupted audio enthusiast living below a bridge and reading this forum will always vote poor then, no matter the performance...
 
Last edited:

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,991
Likes
36,199
Location
The Neitherlands
How can you tell? You don’t even know what you’re looking at. It’s almost certainly a 4 or 6 layer board because on the bottom side is a Xilinx Artix 7 FPGA. You can’t route one on a 2 layer board, period. Audio grade caps are a scam and I see appropriate components here.

There will have to be a lot of buried vias to accomodate for a BGA on the bottom side so lots of layers would be needed.
 

anphex

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
May 14, 2021
Messages
679
Likes
887
Location
Berlin, Germany
Uuh...
tom-delonge-wtf1 (1).gif
 

chris719

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
373
Likes
423
There will have to be a lot of buried vias to accomodate for a BGA on the bottom side so lots of layers would be needed.
You can do an Artix 7 without blind or buried vias if you choose the largest pitch package (0.8mm I think). Not sure what he’s using. Either way I agree with you, it’s definitely not some simple 2 layer board.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,586
Likes
239,414
Location
Seattle Area
The difference is there. You can also see it in this review.
But the real question is whether it provides an audible improvement or not. And that's not something we can answer definitely. Every person can answer it for themselves with a blind test.

EDIT: Of all the things to "worry about" in an audio setup this one ranks very very low, to the point that IMO you can safely ignore it. But I remain open-minded in case someone eventually proves that there is an audible benefit.
I included audio samples. Can you tell the difference between them?
 
Top Bottom