Didn’t I already say the unit was out of warranty? Second hand/out of warranty products mean the manufacturer has no legal obligation to repair the product.Good luck with that to the people who buy used.
Didn’t I already say the unit was out of warranty? Second hand/out of warranty products mean the manufacturer has no legal obligation to repair the product.Good luck with that to the people who buy used.
Of course I know. Why whould I ask that question otherwise?Is that a rhetorical question? Do you know?
The capacitor should obviously have been selected to have a very long life in its intended usage.
Of course I know. Why whould I ask that question otherwise? [snip]
Second hand out of warranty, and First hand out of warranty is sometimes handled differently, (especially without a receipt). Sometimes a company repairs for free (a few cents in parts) to keep the customers loyalty but if they see no future benefit in you they might reject and drain you in the moment because that's the only time they perceive benefiting from you.Didn’t I already say the unit was out of warranty? Second hand/out of warranty products mean the manufacturer has no legal obligation to repair the product.
Read the sentence as is. If I need to make a snarky comment I will make sure the reader will not fail to understand it as a snark.It came across as snark.
Refusal due to second hand will not go so well in EU, depending on the country.... Second hand/out of warranty products mean the manufacturer has no legal obligation to repair the product.
Well, subjective and personal...I started with it before 1970. So I'm not sure...if I don't hear "digital sound", maybe it's because my hearing has deteriorated over the years.I wouldn’t know for sure unless I heard it. I always leave some wiggle room as audio is very subjective and personal. I was hoping you know what “digital” sounding means but I was wrong you have obvious never heard non “digital” sound reproduction in your life - go borrow a Linn turntable or some tape and get some listening experience
I'm not sure if Johnson noise allows this kind of performance in room temperature. Someone with more clue than me please correct me.I would expect the Chord DAVE SINAD to be at least 120 + 10*log($14,000 / $650) = 133.3 dB.
Read the sentence as is. If I need to make a snarky comment I will make sure the reader will not fail to understand it as a snark.
Snap, crackle, pop, wow, flutter and hiss? So glad those days are over.- go borrow a Linn turntable or some tape and get some listening experience
Measures about perfectly transparent, if we disregard the looks and absurd price there really isn't anything to criticise in real world use.Who the heck voted this as Great? Golfing Panther. Maybe a typo? Gotta be a typo
I agree. Technically it is "fine" and in 2015 may have even been "Outstanding" although DACs have been more or less transparent for decades so I am not sure how helpful that is. Looks are subjective but the overall appearance is definitely unique and is "Not Terrible" IMO. The screen fonts are terrible from a usability perspective and should never have been used this side of the turn of the century and is "Poor" IMO. Value for money is outrageous and rates a "Poor".Measures about perfectly transparent, if we disregard the looks and absurd price there really isn't anything to criticise in real world use.
yea sure, the SINAD is even ~10 db better than my R2R Holoaudio Spring 2, and I run that in NOS...Measures about perfectly transparent, if we disregard the looks and absurd price there really isn't anything to criticise in real world use.
Not really, not for me. I get the snap/crackle/pop much more than I did 50 years ago. Almost all my records were new and clean and so on. Now, a lot of the music I listen to has samples from old R&B records in it, sometimes it's a bit irritating, but it usually passes in a few seconds.Snap, crackle, pop, wow, flutter and hiss? So glad those days are over.
I am getting confused. I ordered the unit new near end of year 2019. Or are you talking about another unit?Of course I know. Why whould I ask that question otherwise?
Electrolytic capacitors have a finite and defined life. You can shorten that time by stressing them more than how that time was specified. Temperature is the main reason.
A quality capacitor with a radius of 10mm will be specified at 7000hrs. DAVE was introduced in May 2015. If this unit belongs to the first manufactured batch and it is run for 4hrs a day the capacitor has been polarised for 10,000hrs. If the temperature of the unit is hot to touch as @amirm reported then the capacitor most likely had reached EOL somewhere back in 2019.
At 30% over use the capacitor effectiveness is expected to be reduced around 50% now. It is general practice to over-specify electrolytic capacitors by 2-3x. Hence, given the use case the capacitor should still be doing its job but in need of replacement.
Not really, not for me. I get the snap/crackle/pop much more than I did 50 years ago. Almost all my records were new and clean and so on. Now, a lot of the music I listen to has samples from old R&B records in it, sometimes it's a bit irritating, but it usually passes in a few seconds.
...So this record crate-digging thing is a bit weird to me.
I immediately get a sense of nostalgia whenever I hear a song that starts with the characteristic crackle and pop of a record but I would rather listen to an all-digital version that is clean.Not really, not for me. I get the snap/crackle/pop much more than I did 50 years ago. Almost all my records were new and clean and so on. Now, a lot of the music I listen to has samples from old R&B records in it, sometimes it's a bit irritating, but it usually passes in a few seconds.
...So this record crate-digging thing is a bit weird to me.