TL;DR: Why am I doing this to myself? And do I really care at all about pots vs stepped attenuator?
Two weeks ago I purchased some Klipsch RF7-II speakers and a Marantz SR6013 to power them... and I caught the bug again. To be honest, I really liked the sound from the Marantz. It was smooth, warm, and I just didn't get tired of it. Music sounded I know sounded like I'm listening to it for the first time. So my curiosity went in to overdrive... what sorcery is this??? I picked up an Onkyo TX-SR393 at Best Buy for $250 and set it next to the Marantz and benchmarked the two for fun. The Onkyo has a very different sound... much, much brighter. That's interesting.
After reading the relatively poor reviews here on even the flagships from Marantz, I set out on my fools quest to try and beat their flagships. And as a challenge, do it for a small fraction of the price.
I don't need 11 channels of audio. I don't need THX, Dolby, etc... I just want excellent stereo. By day 2 I had made some decisions:
1. The budget should be around $600 total.
2. Must be at least 100w/channel in a stereo setup.
3. The best of (reasonably priced) "state of the art" class D chips: TPA3255EVM amplifier.
4. The very best of inexpensive DACs: WesionTEK Khadas Tone Board DAC.
5. Digital room EQ and calibration at the audio source.
6. Minimum number of electrical components.
I've got a problem here... there's no volume control in the circuit. So down the rabbit hole I go.
Preamps: Breaks my #5 rule. Too much crap in the signal path.
Stepped attenuator: $300 for volume control. Breaks rule #1.
Potentiometer: Take the poison... Possibly ALPS Stereo Potentiometer.
Let me be totally honest here. My source of entertainment is mostly Youtube and 60% "youtuber" amateur content, with a dab of Amazon Prime/Netflix, and Spotify music in the background... The audio source is already compromised.. Youtube at worst and compression on Spotify at best.
So should I really care enough to worry about the harms of a potentiometer?
Two weeks ago I purchased some Klipsch RF7-II speakers and a Marantz SR6013 to power them... and I caught the bug again. To be honest, I really liked the sound from the Marantz. It was smooth, warm, and I just didn't get tired of it. Music sounded I know sounded like I'm listening to it for the first time. So my curiosity went in to overdrive... what sorcery is this??? I picked up an Onkyo TX-SR393 at Best Buy for $250 and set it next to the Marantz and benchmarked the two for fun. The Onkyo has a very different sound... much, much brighter. That's interesting.
After reading the relatively poor reviews here on even the flagships from Marantz, I set out on my fools quest to try and beat their flagships. And as a challenge, do it for a small fraction of the price.
I don't need 11 channels of audio. I don't need THX, Dolby, etc... I just want excellent stereo. By day 2 I had made some decisions:
1. The budget should be around $600 total.
2. Must be at least 100w/channel in a stereo setup.
3. The best of (reasonably priced) "state of the art" class D chips: TPA3255EVM amplifier.
4. The very best of inexpensive DACs: WesionTEK Khadas Tone Board DAC.
5. Digital room EQ and calibration at the audio source.
6. Minimum number of electrical components.
I've got a problem here... there's no volume control in the circuit. So down the rabbit hole I go.
Preamps: Breaks my #5 rule. Too much crap in the signal path.
Stepped attenuator: $300 for volume control. Breaks rule #1.
Potentiometer: Take the poison... Possibly ALPS Stereo Potentiometer.
Let me be totally honest here. My source of entertainment is mostly Youtube and 60% "youtuber" amateur content, with a dab of Amazon Prime/Netflix, and Spotify music in the background... The audio source is already compromised.. Youtube at worst and compression on Spotify at best.
So should I really care enough to worry about the harms of a potentiometer?