Bad for you then. Controlled tests have no requirement for time limit. You can listen for a year if you want. You just have to not know what you are listening to.
I say bad for you above because this theory has been tested and proven to not help audiophiles hear differences. See my AES paper digest:
Sensitivity and Reliability of ABX Blind Testing
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ity-and-reliability-of-abx-blind-testing.186/
View attachment 95609
Let me save you a lot of energy and tell you to not keep going this path in this forum. We know your arguments. They are fallacious. We can demonstrate them concretely per above. Just like medical research, proper listening tests are critical to validity of of audio research. This is why there are protocols to do things right. And dismissal of everything else.
If you go by your personal opinion of what is wrong with you instead of going to a doctor, then by all means, dismiss audio science. I don't know what you do in your profession so perhaps you think anyone on the Internet can have a more valid opinion about your area of profession without any experience or training there. But it is not how we act in this forum. We follow the science as we do in other walks of life.