• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

CD Player Recommendation - 600.00 to 700.00 Dollar range

A very typical impedance profile, combined with their measured 87dB sensitivity, makes them anything but a difficult load. Again, the Marantz amp has more than enough power to fry these speakers well before it runs out of power.
An ideal amp will double power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm - so we'd expect to see the Marantz put at least 130 watts into 4 ohms, instead it only manages 100 watts. You really think that won't affect its performance with this speaker system? Experience tells me otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
An ideal amp will double power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm - so we'd expect to see the Marantz put at least 130 watts into 4 ohms, instead it only manages 100 watts. You really think that won't affect its performance with this speaker system? Experience tells me otherwise.
100 watts will blow these speakers to bits. It doesn't need to be an ideal amp to still be more than enough.
 
An ideal amp will double power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm - so we'd expect to see the Marantz put at least 130 watts into 4 ohms, instead it only manages 100 watts. You really think that won't affect its performance with this speaker system? Experience tells me otherwise.
No
 
I have lots of amplifiers including a Krell KSA50S and a NAD 320BEE

Both have about the same power output into 8 ohms (67 watts).

The Krell has a toroidal transformer the size of a grapefruit. The NAD has a frame transformer small enough you could put it in your pocket.

You think all that matters is the number of watts into 8 ohm? Seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
The only thing that matters is that it has the power required for the speaker's impedance. If those speakers drop to 4 ohms at 40 Hz, that means the Marantz can still deliver 100 watts, which is probably enough to blow those woofers out of the basket.
Having more power or more current is only useful if you reach the limits. Below those limits, it makes no difference whether you have 1000 watts at 4 ohms or 50 if the speaker uses 30 watts.

Edit
and to answer OP, with that money the biggest improvement you can get is to buy two good bookshelfs keeping your CD player
 
Last edited:
The only thing that matters is that it has the power required for the speaker's impedance. If those speakers drop to 4 ohms at 40 Hz, that means the Marantz can still deliver 100 watts, which is probably enough to blow those woofers out of the basket.
Having more power or more current is only useful if you reach the limits. Below those limits, it makes no difference whether you have 1000 watts at 4 ohms or 50 if the speaker uses 30 watts.
No. The relationship between amp and load is far more complex than that. But I'm not going to continue to argue. My advice to the o/p is to get a more capable amplifier, he can take that or leave it.
 
1000140038.jpg

So you're suggesting to someone with these speakers, that the best upgrade they can make is to replace an already excellent Marantz 8005?
 
No. The relationship between amp and load is far more complex than that. But I'm not going to continue to argue. My advice to the o/p is to get a more capable amplifier, he can take that or leave it.

More capable of blowing the speakers? Or more capable in some other way that actually matters in this situation?
 
View attachment 466957
So you're suggesting to someone with these speakers, that the best upgrade they can make is to replace an already excellent Marantz 8005?
There is the bass module too, which is not powered. That is what makes the system a tougher load. You don't need a Krell on it but the Marantz is not 'excellent' since it cannot maintain voltage as impedance falls, it is much poorer in that respect than many similar price amps.
 
An ideal amp will double power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm - so we'd expect to see the Marantz put at least 130 watts into 4 ohms, instead it only manages 100 watts. You really think that won't affect its performance with this speaker system? Experience tells me otherwise.
I have never seen an 'ideal' amp that doubles its power unless it was overbuilt and cost thousands of dollars. Can you provide an example of one at a reasonable cost that does this because in having read hundreds of amplifier tests it appears to be an audiophile myth.
 
I have never seen an 'ideal' amp that doubles its power unless it was overbuilt and cost thousands of dollars. Can you provide an example of one at a reasonable cost that does this because in having read hundreds of amplifier tests it appears to be an audiophile myth.
My use of the word 'ideal' was entirely deliberate. No amp truly doubles down. Read my post again.

70 watts into 8 ohm and only 100 into 4 ohm is not impressive performance, certainly not 'excellent.'
 
My use of the word 'ideal' was entirely deliberate. No amp truly doubles down. Read my post again.

70 watts into 8 ohm and only 100 into 4 ohm is not impressive performance, certainly not 'excellent.'
But I would argue sufficient or at least you're likely to get more improvement by getting new speakers vs. getting a higher wattage amp. Now if the higher wattage amp has a good EQ system to compensate for both the room and the speakers that might be different.:cool:

Another possibility that might address your concerns would be to get a decent subwoofer and ditch the unpowered bass unit to relieve the stress on the amp.

On the other hand I'm not even sure if the OP is still there.
 
I have never seen an 'ideal' amp that doubles its power unless it was overbuilt and cost thousands of dollars. Can you provide an example of one at a reasonable cost that does this because in having read hundreds of amplifier tests it appears to be an audiophile myth.
I'll offer up these 2 & say: Maybe (I am biased, I have 6 of the first one and highly desire 2 or 3 of the second one).
You decide.
 
But I would argue sufficient or at least you're likely to get more improvement by getting new speakers vs. getting a higher wattage amp. Now if the higher wattage amp has a good EQ system to compensate for both the room and the speakers that might be different.:cool:

Another possibility that might address your concerns would be to get a decent subwoofer and ditch the unpowered bass unit to relieve the stress on the amp.

On the other hand I'm not even sure if the OP is still there.
Agreed and in my original reply I said change the amp or the speakers. But the speaker system is pretty old so I'd guess it works for his room and he wants to keep it.
 
Seems more likely there are differences in the mastering between the albums on vinyl and CD and you prefer the vinyl. Plus it’s possible your cartridge is adding some colour of its own which you like.

To satisfy your curiosity, if your amp has a digital input try that with your CD player and see how it compares to the CD player analogue outputs. You should find no difference other than maybe volume level.

Some of the comments on this thread are quite baffling TBH, it’s like reading a ‘regular’ audio forum. Some real drivel.
 
Digital has quantization noise which you can hear at 8-bits but not at 16-bits or better (under normal listening conditions).
If you want to hear an extreme example of what quantization noise can sound like, listen to this video at around 0:20-0:35 when the operator increases the “crush” (bit depth reduction) control:

 
Last edited:
I was looking to buy a CDP to connect to my Hegel Dac, I'm currently using a £60 BluRay to player CDs and it sounds good. I know I would get more feature with a CDP, but would it sound any better than the BluRay player I'm currently using?
 
Back
Top Bottom