• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Capital Audiofest 2025; November 14th-16th

??

Exhibitors in general definitely does not play mostly rock music.
When I say mostly, I don't mean >50%. Of all the music genres, percentage wise, rock is the highest. Maybe 40%? Then the other 60% is a mixture of everything else. At least that is my experience.
 
Who…. ME? :D



I think possibly the best overall sound I’ve had my room was with my Thiel 3.7 speakers. They just seemed to do it all so well, combine so many of the attributes I care about . Still, I prefer some aspects of my Joseph Perspectives (and even some aspects of my Thiel 2.7s).

But in the end, the reason I wouldn’t keep the 3.7s is the reason I sold them - too big.

So of all the loudspeakers I’ve owned, my favourites have been the Thiel 3.7 , Thiel 2.7 and Joseph Perspectives, and I still own the 2.7s and Josephs, so I guess it would come down to choosing between the Thiels and Josephs. That’s such a tough pick that I couldn’t make the choice which is why I kept both.

The Thiels sound tonally convincing, sound a bit bigger than the Josephs, and they have a thicker, denser more corporeal presentation than the Joseph speakers.

The Joseph speakers do an incredible disappearing act, and sound summit more refined especially in the highs, and tonally/timbrally they are the most gorgeous speakers I’ve heard in that respect. I find the mesmerizing. Plus the Joseph speakers sound quite fun and punchy for plenty of music (both speakers play all types of music wonderfully).

I think if I absolutely had to choose one, it would be the Joseph speakers at this point.
I find their level of refinement just so compelling, and they are smaller and slimmer so they take up less room.
Have you run frequency sweeps on them? Pics and details of setups?
 
When I say mostly, I don't mean >50%. Of all the music genres, percentage wise, rock is the highest. Maybe 40%? Then the other 60% is a mixture of everything else. At least that is my experience.
So it's a plurality kind of mostly, then, eh?
:)
 
Who…. ME? :D



I think possibly the best overall sound I’ve had my room was with my Thiel 3.7 speakers. They just seemed to do it all so well, combine so many of the attributes I care about . Still, I prefer some aspects of my Joseph Perspectives (and even some aspects of my Thiel 2.7s).

But in the end, the reason I wouldn’t keep the 3.7s is the reason I sold them - too big.

So of all the loudspeakers I’ve owned, my favourites have been the Thiel 3.7 , Thiel 2.7 and Joseph Perspectives, and I still own the 2.7s and Josephs, so I guess it would come down to choosing between the Thiels and Josephs. That’s such a tough pick that I couldn’t make the choice which is why I kept both.

The Thiels sound tonally convincing, sound a bit bigger than the Josephs, and they have a thicker, denser more corporeal presentation than the Joseph speakers.

The Joseph speakers do an incredible disappearing act, and sound summit more refined especially in the highs, and tonally/timbrally they are the most gorgeous speakers I’ve heard in that respect. I find the mesmerizing. Plus the Joseph speakers sound quite fun and punchy for plenty of music (both speakers play all types of music wonderfully).

I think if I absolutely had to choose one, it would be the Joseph speakers at this point.
I find their level of refinement just so compelling, and they are smaller and slimmer so they take up less room.
Not sure if you have the graphene or the magnesium woofers in your Joseph's, I have the 6" magnesium woofers in one of my Salks and couldn't be happier with their sound and extension. I actually enjoy them more than my other Salk speaker with the Eaton ARCOSIA 4" mid-range. I just love the sound from the Seas woofers (and Dennis Murphy's crossover work around their breakup)
 
Have you run frequency sweeps on them?

No, I’m not really into that. I find dialing them in by ear to work just fine. And if the sound comes across as balanced to me I don’t go chasing every wiggle in a frequency graph. Especially in the bass. for me that way lies madness.
:)

(the closest I came was when I had subwoofers for a while, and I used DSP to flatten the bass response. Ultimately, I preferred the sound of my system without the subwoofers and I didn’t like the extra gear and hassle so I got rid of that stuff).


Pics and details of setups?

I’ve posted before about my room, but I just posted a bunch of photos and information in this members systems thread, here:

 
Forgot to post this picture.

Sometimes you really have to wonder if some people who really convinced themselves of their own made up pseudoscience.

Someone please explain this half exposed tweeter and the science behind it.

1000027977.jpg
 
I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder. . .but. . .

1000027981.jpg
 
but does it sound good?
Not that I remember. The thing with shows is that, you also can't judge how bad a speaker really is, unless it is just out right terrible.
 
Forgot to post this picture.

Sometimes you really have to wonder if some people who really convinced themselves of their own made up pseudoscience.

Someone please explain this half exposed tweeter and the science behind it.

View attachment 493376
Manger offered something like that (covering half of the MSW, but vertically dividing, and transparent PVC or similar stuff). Did'nt get what it was good for.
 
Someone please explain this half exposed tweeter and the science behind it.

View attachment 493376
That configuration places the tweeter as close as it can be to the intersection of two boundaries, as we can see.

And while those two boundaries don't look very big to us, they are probably large enough to control the directivity of sound waves at the wavelengths the tweeter covers.

It looks to me like that speaker is intended to be placed flush up against a wall, whereby the wall itself becomes a directivity-shaping boundary at wavelengths too long for the enclosure's surfaces to control (as I think they are doing for that tweeter).

There might be a woofer down near the floor, such that it ends up effectively at the intersection of the floor and the closest wall.

My guess is the design is optimized for good in-room response while being minimally intrusive on the room's living space.
 
Last edited:
Manger offered something like that (covering half of the MSW, but vertically dividing, and transparent PVC or similar stuff). Did'nt get what it was good for.

If I recall it correctly, they called it ´holographic profile´ or similar. Apparently, the idea was to reduce the active fraction of the diaphragm which is forming an even wavefront, so dispersion would be wider, localization more precise, and narrowed beaming towards higher frequencies reduced.
 
they sounded very nice on all music played thru them
If they sounded well, placed into the corner as in the picture, they are indolescent to placement, at least.
 
Back
Top Bottom