- Thread Starter
- #621
Someone please do a data compare on the two 20MByte tracks and on the two 66MByte tracks.
When I see a reason to change my mind I will.
Without EQ turned on I get -300db bit perfect with both pairs of files. Each file in the pair is offset by about 200 samples and is identical otherwise. The A set is 96 khz and the other set is 44 khz. I also get that result with L+R the only difference is dbA results are a bit over 300 db.
Yes, yes, and no. See: Clever Hans.
I reset to the same parameters as you and also got bit perfect with the 24/96 versions.
But it's not a guitar. It's a bass.
Is it not true that women generally hear better than men? Also wives are usually husbands' closest friends and spend a lot of time around their men while they work on their hobbies (and vice versa). Wife references are valid.
Yes. At those levels and depending on the options selected, one gets into all kind of numerical representation/accuracy issues. Already talked a bit about those with @pkane privately. I can see people making mountains of "significant differences" in graphs while they don't actually exist.
But it's not a guitar. It's a bass. Just like this:
Is this picture disrespectful to men?
So proof that @Empirical Audio is hearing differences when there are noneWithout EQ turned on I get -300db bit perfect with both pairs of files. Each file in the pair is offset by about 200 samples and is identical otherwise. The A set is 96 khz and the other set is 44 khz. I also get that result with L+R the only difference is dbA results are a bit over 300 db.
View attachment 23700
View attachment 23701
Proof we are measuring the wrong thing.So proof that @Empirical Audio is hearing differences when there are none.
The files pointed to earlier in the thread on the Mutec. The first two are different in some ways. Here is a Deltawave result comparing them. All the others also compare with about the same results. Most of the difference is between 500 and 1000 hz. I would think this audible. View attachment 23695
View attachment 23696
Yes it's built-in to the software. Playback of the difference and adjustable boost up to 100 db. I listened and it mostly left a boost around what would be the vocal fundamentals. Everything else was all but gone. I don't know the provenance so don't have anything to say about that.Can the difference file be made audible ?
Would/could the differences be caused by reclockers or might this be done 'on purpose' to create small audible differences in order to sell a product at the expense of a competitor (which would be a sick thing to do).
My comment was about everyone, not your pose specifically.I have reworded the comment in case it was misconstrued.