You mean the stuff where the singer is trying his best to sound like a cross between some demon from h-ell and a drill sergeant?
Yea I'll pass on that too.
The genre that proves men can do vocal fry better than women. Go gargle.
You mean the stuff where the singer is trying his best to sound like a cross between some demon from h-ell and a drill sergeant?
Yea I'll pass on that too.
To get people into classical music, I would recommend buying a large box set of CDs, with as wide a selection of recordings as possible from different historical eras. Then they can switch between them until they find what they like.
So a box set of music arranged historically:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/HISTORY-CLASSICAL-MUSIC-box-set/dp/B00E83QVVM
I must admit, that I find it difficult to put myself in the position of a person who doesn't like classical or jazz music, so I might not be able to see it easily from their point of view. I fell in love with classical music when I was around 3 years old and began piano lessons when I was 8.
Without classical (and jazz) music, what is the purpose of a hi-fi system though? (For pop music, the cheapest system sounds great to my ears).
I don't think it sounds poor on hi-fi systems. Rather, I find it usually sounds already fine on cheaper systems, or even on television speakers.Why do you think music other than classical and jazz sounds poor on HiFi systems. Do you only listen to 1950s and 1960s vinyl singles?
Such snobbery is all to often proffered by classical music advocates.
Why? Hearing the inner detail, the impact of a well played drumset, etc etc etc is just as important for rock as any classical.On the other hand, hi-fi systems seem more like a requirement (rather than just optional) for listening to classical music and jazz, so that the sound of acoustic instruments and the space around them is reproduced, and it doesn't sound completely unlike the live version of the music.
Hi-fi will be more necessary for classical music, as reproduction of acoustic instruments is challenging, and the compositions were designed to be heard live. The problem is that reproduced music often sounds very unlike (and far worse than) a live orchestra, or unamplified acoustic instruments.Why? Hearing the inner detail, the impact of a well played drumset, etc etc etc is just as important for rock as any classical.
Classical sounds just fine to me in it's most heard environment, elevators.
Only point I can find to support your position is that anything that can be done to cement the listeners attention is a big bonus since in general classical music is so boring.
That's just more of the classical music snobbery I've heard way too many times. Your above post details how little you actually know about popular music, the experience of hearing it live and it's reproduction in the home. Also you think your music is more important and deserving of accurate, high quality reproduction which is complete bullschitt.Hi-fi is more necessary for classical music, as it is reproduction of acoustic instruments which is challenging, and the compositions were designed to be heard live. The problem is that reproduced music often sounds very unlike (and far worse) than live orchestra and a real acoustic instrument.
With pop music, this is often less of a worry. The music is primarily designed to be reproduced and heard on radio, rather than listened to live, and it also uses mainly electronic instruments.
There isn't the same variation of timbre, there is usually less dynamic range, there is less need to separate instruments, and there isn't a "real" live acoustic instrument to compare it to. Compare for example, reproduction of a digital piano used in a pop song, to Michelangeli's tone on Debussy prelude. The latter is a lot more difficult.
That's just more of the classical music snobbery I've heard way too many times. Your above post details how little you actually know about popular music, the experience of hearing it live and it's reproduction in the home. Also you think your music is more important and deserving of accurate, high quality reproduction which is complete bullschitt.
We have nothing more to discuss.
Everyone who actually cares about music is a snob about the music they like.
Everyone who actually cares about music is a snob about the music they like.
Others may say the same things about their involvement in different genres.
Requiring approval/affirmation by others is not unusual but not necessary for everyone.
You regret that others don't like classical music and that you only have a small circle of like minded people to share your interest with.
This happens with all sorts of specific human interest. Do you feel you should adopt those interests of others? I am wondering why you expect others to feel as you do? It seems somewhat self-centric, if not didactic, to me?
Live and let live. Enjoy your interest.
P.S. An old mate of mine has a passion for Nudism. He can't understand why his wife and others don't share his view.
" …. one of my life's regrets is that I cannot get everyone to like classical music"
@paradoxical3, your words.
I don't expect others to feel as I do whatsoever. That doesn't mean I can't personally wish I had more people to share it with.
I think you could do well abiding by your own advice instead of making presumptions on others. After all, you are the one with 4600 posts on a very specific, niche interest forum which is focused around personal, self-centric enjoyment of audio.
I abide by what I posted. I like what I like re music and don't expect others to agree to give me some personal comfort.
Which is exactly what I said, despite your inability to see it. I was literally validating your right to an opinion in my post - and further, agreeing with it. In your angst, you are choosing to fight a battle that exists only in your mind. Might I suggest listening to some classical music? Some studies have shown it to improve cognitive function.