For what that table costs I could get a visit from one of the ladiesTurntables - good.
at "College Cuties dot com" a couple nights a week for life!
For what that table costs I could get a visit from one of the ladiesTurntables - good.
Just become a sugaH DaddY.... Apparently it's becoming common these days from what I read. It's easier and has more relationship qualities that might be more full-filling unless you just want some intermittent recreation and then some down time in between.For what that table costs I could get a visit from one of the ladies
at "College Cuties dot com" a couple nights a week for life!
Naw, just like wife's they're way too high maintenance for me.Just become a sugaH DaddY.... Apparently it's becoming common these days from what I read.
Yeah, but if someone gave me one I would be tempted to set it up for awhile. Then sell it and buy a truck and or a couple of motorcycles.For what that table costs I could get a visit from one of the ladies
at "College Cuties dot com" a couple nights a week for life!
Bonus points if that was photographed from a CRT display!
Ha. Scraped it off FB today. Couldn’t resist.Bonus points if that was photographed from a CRT display!
Same here, only it's CDs.The funny thing about rekkids...
I like rekkids.
I like listening to rekkids.
I have... umm... a lot of rekkids. A LOT.
I rarely play them.
Too much trouble.
In cherry picking quotes out of context you forgot about this gem (emphasis mine):
"That's not happened with the LP- yet. So we know (whether we like it or not) the existing art needs improvement. You can make the argument that people prefer distortion.. and other such nonsense. Sheesh! The pragmatic individual will look at the bigger picture and see its really obvious the digital still has some homework to do."
Can anyone explain why this garbage thread is approaching 1,500 posts?
Oxymoron. It’s Argumentative anti-Science Review. (I know you knew that, but I’m just making it clear.)
Notice how the thread topic asks us to explain a social purchasing trend? There are only 2 ways to do that: launch in too-eagerly with one’s own thoughts on the matter (typically based on nothing but intuition - where’s the science in that?), or discover or create (and execute) a well-designed opinion survey on the matter.
Guess which way is dominating this thread? That’s right, the one that allows the over-opinionated fastest-typing keyboard warriors to go on, and on, and on, and on. The ones who think that if everyone else gets tired of reading their missives (let alone responding), they win. And the ones who take a paper-thin sliver of evidence and convince themselves that it is sufficient for them to insist it is The Truth and defend it to the death and demand that others disprove it.
Oh, science is right out of the window for this thread. Yes it’s a social science question, but the discussion lacks evidence and it lacks any rigour in any discussion of what little evidence has been posted. Eg how to get a properly randomized survey of LP buyers, so that when we ask them why vinyl, the answer isn’t dominated by audiophilia. And for those occasions when they say “because it sounds better”, how to eliminate sighted bias from Average Vinyl Joe’s belief that it is in the sound waves? Well, that would be hard to do as a social science experiment, so it hasn’t been done, so the science-based answer to the thread topic should be that we lack data of high enough quality to form a solid hypothesis.
End of thread — as an audio science discussion.
Start of thread — as an audio anti-science argument. Go on, off you go.
the deep is not enough deeperNew article in the Guardian speaks to some of the themes that have been written about in this thread - hints at the kind of dissatisfaction with ubiquitous streaming music that is driving some to more “hands on” experience:
‘There’s endless choice, but you’re not listening’: fans quitting Spotify to save their love of music
Former streaming service subscribers on why they have ditched mod cons for MP3s, CDs and other DIY music formatswww.theguardian.com
The principal driving force for uptake of digital media has always been convenience. Has anyone really argued otherwise? On the other hand, anyone who argues, 'lots of people are listening to X, therefore X must sound better,' is just ignoring the way most people actually think.Just the same as saying most people listening to digital music these days are listening on phone speakers or at best cheap bluetooth speakers. So perhaps quality isn’t the issue there, either.
It's a good article, and there's a telling quote right at the top:New article in the Guardian speaks to some of the themes that have been written about in this thread - hints at the kind of dissatisfaction with ubiquitous streaming music that is driving some to more “hands on” experience:
‘There’s endless choice, but you’re not listening’: fans quitting Spotify to save their love of music
Former streaming service subscribers on why they have ditched mod cons for MP3s, CDs and other DIY music formatswww.theguardian.com
1500 post and no one has delivered the true answer. The kids are all about non binary.
That is, Its fashionable, thats it, no big secret. Turntables get you likes on facbook. But so does cutting your dick off and I don't understand that either.
Yes of course I saw that. Did you see I said I'd challenge Atmosphere's comment about digital?
Again...I was responding to Leporello writing:
"No mystery needing explanation there. But many vinylphiles constantly argue as if this was a deep problem challenging our understanding of audio - "something that keeps vinyl alive". We never hear the basis and support for this idea, as the mystery has to be kept alive. But it just has to be talked about constantly, over and over again."
I took that as his complaint that people were attributing some mystery to the appeal of vinyl. Like there was some unexplainable thing, or that people were hinting there was some technically undiscovered aspect of vinyl for why "people think it sounds better" or whatever.
I did not take his comment to be about the "mysteries of digital audio" because he referenced vinyl.
And as I've said: I haven't seen people putting forth this mysterious case for the vinyl renaissance.
Now if Leporello meant instead to reference some mystery about DIGITAL sound, then he could correct my understanding. I would rather understand what he meant if I haven't done so. But if he was referencing digital mysteries, it wasn't clear from his post.
Matt’s fake quote is right. You do move the goalposts a lot. Usually right after punching a straw man, being deliberately obscure, and stating facts unsupported by evidence.'If all else fails, move the goal posts.'
- Matt Hooper
Matt’s fake quote is right. You do move the goalposts a lot. Usually right after punching a straw man, being deliberately obscure, and stating facts unsupported by evidence.