MatrixS2000
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2023
- Messages
- 503
- Likes
- 747
Nice Benz cartridge. I run a Benz Ref 3 Silver on my Pro-ject RPM 9. 
Nice Benz cartridge. I run a Benz Ref 3 Silver on my Pro-ject RPM 9.![]()
Most appeling thing about early first press cd's an for that matter later press cd's if same source digital date is used over vinyl (not to mention vinyl limitation that i detested already in the 80ties when cd came out till today) you got for an eternity the transients (they define partly the energy of a track) that was on the master at the time. At least it would be wise to use a digital file to make a laquer for vinyl as MoFI did an penalised for.I got some CDs today, reissues of old favorites, where the packaging was improved as well as the contents and sound. The "Grateful Dead" collection of live performances from 1971 and "Grateful Dead/Europe '72" issues were updated by Rhino records, both in 2003. Instead of using jewel cases these use "Digipacks", cardboard exteriors with plastic interiors much like jewel cases but a bit sturdier. Both have expanded liner notes, unlike the LPs or the initial CD issues. They also have bonus tracks. In 2011 the entirety of the recordings made during the Dead's tour of Europe in 1972 were reissued as 73 CDs - I've recently seen a Conan O'Brien joke posted on Facebook "It has been announced that there will be a 73-disc set of the Grateful Dead about to be issued. It has not yet been announced what song they will be playing". In any case, another CD set I got today is a two-disc volume 2 of Europe '72, with no overlap of the previous issue of Europe '72. This set has no liner notes, just a booklet of photos from the concerts.
I prefer the Digipacks - they don't break when you drop them. I suppose what makes LPs visually appealing is how they have rainbow patterns when the light reflects off their surface as they spin. Not to mention the record covers. But I have no issues with the appearance of the CDs themselves, just the jewel cases.
The reduction in steps when Mofi make those expensive one-step discs has nothing to do with using a digital copy, and indeed they have used the one step process with an analogue master in the past, as I understand it - and of course they tried to "hide" the use of the digital step when they did use it. Claiming now that the DSD is part of their improved system is a bit disingenuous if you ask me.Most appeling thing about early first press an for that matter later press cd's if same source digital date is used over vinyl (not to mention vinyl limitation that i detested already in the 80ties when cd came out till today) You got for an internity the transients (they define partly the energy of a track) that was on the master at the time. At least it would be wise to use a digital file to make a laquer for vinyl as the MoFI did an penalised for.For me (step one) the digital file has by far the preference.
View attachment 427743
Transient (acoustics) - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
![]()
Is transient response the most important thing for the perceived audio quality in a system ?
My target is exactly that - 95db max SPL, my normal listening levels (average volume) is around 75db, and allowing for 20db peaks takes me to 95db.... but I like to provide headroom beyond that (up to circa 105db) .... just because some music has that sort of dynamics - even when they are brief...www.audiosciencereview.com
![]()
Mobile Fidelity’s Digital Vinyl Debacle: Are your records really analog?
Mobile Fidelity has been caught in a lie. After years of claiming to produce pure analog vinyl, it's been revealed that the company regularly uses digital DSD transfers in the production of its remasters.www.audioholics.com
With one step i meant only the dsd file i would prefer so basicly no steps.The reduction in steps when Mofi make those expensive one-step discs has nothing to do with using a digital copy, and indeed they have used the one step process with an analogue master in the past, as I understand it - and of course they tried to "hide" the use of the digital step when they did use it. Claiming now that the DSD is part of their improved system is a bit disingenuous if you ask me.
The traditional process allows many more LPs to be made from an original cut, and they can still be adequately quiet and detailed when produced properly. That is what most vinyl listeners are hearing, most of the time, and people seem to be perfectly happy with it.
Why a second one? Was it somehow destroyed? I had my stylus replaced on my Benz about year ago and it is as good as new now.I’m using the Benz micro Ebony L cartridge.
It’s my second one.
I read until Fremer was mentioned, then I stopped. I don’t believe that well designed ADCs sound different. I have a Tascam DA-3000 that I use to digitize my vinyl. The output is transparent to my analog chain. Am I to believe that only the Tascam is a transparent ADC? I doubt it. I am going to be getting an RME 2/4 once my new listening room is built. If that sounds different, then I will be pointing to my analog phono pre not the Tascam as the 2/4 has built in RIAA correction.Read the part "Is Analog Really Better"
I read until Fremer was mentioned, then I stopped. I don’t believe that well designed ADCs sound different. I have a Tascam DA-3000 that I use to digitize my vinyl. The output is transparent to my analog chain. Am I to believe that only the Tascam is a transparent ADC? I doubt it. I am going to be getting an RME 2/4 once my new listening room is built. If that sounds different, then I will be pointing to my analog phono pre not the Tascam as the 2/4 has built in RIAA correction.
Still glad I've got my Topping E 30 - the Tascam DAT recorder would take up too much desktop space. On top of that, I no longer have any use for DATs.Interesting. Did a test last week to compare if my good old 34 year legacy Tascam DA-30 (DAC part) could keep up with my (relative) recent Topping D10 DAC sound quality. So besides a comparison the Topping D10 was also used as spdif converter to the Tascam. Furthermore quality OFC silver-shield interlink cable is used for the Topping an ordinary cable (few Euro) was used for the Tascam (see picture) no doubt if there will be a difference it will be infavor for the Topping. Guess what no difference what so ever listening for hours.The included video is under 1 minute because of max file length using Imuger but you get a impression sound level matched.
View attachment 428297
Same here but for 25,- euro in a thrift store i could not resist still working.Still glad I've got my Topping E 30 - the Tascam DAT recorder would take up too much desktop space. On top of that, I no longer have any use for DATs.
Yeah, got my Tascam DA 30 for $60 over ten years ago, worked perfectly from the git-go. Bit streaming and hand-held recorders put paid to all that.Same here but for 25,- euro in a thrift store i could not resist still working.![]()
25 Euro is about 37 Canadian dollars, I would grab that DAT too for that price!Same here but for 25,- euro in a thrift store i could not resist still working.![]()
Why a second one? Was it somehow destroyed? I had my stylus replaced on my Benz about year ago and it is as good as new now.