No, you might just need to consider the NC502MP version of this amplifier from Buckeye, which provides twice the power. Twice the power, of course, means only a 3 dB gain in power output and therefore maximum listening level. I judge the 502 to provide 330 Watts into the 6 ohms at which my Revel F12's are nominally rated, reported at the knee of the distortion graph (meaning--better than 1% distortion--more like a hundredth of that).
It's about $175 more expensive than the amp being tested in this thread. The only reason to purchase it would be in case one wants the additional power to drive inefficient speakers to high listening levels.
But headroom is poorly specified. My former B&K Reference 125.2 amplifier, a class A/B design, is excellent. It's distortion level is higher at rated power (by a factor of about 10--probably not significant), and it lists a "headroom" specification of 1.2 dB, whatever that means. Assuming that means the ability to fill waveforms requiring higher voltage than would be implied by the continuous power rating for some brief period of time, that would mean a "peak" power rating of maybe 180 wpc. I'm assuming that means a power output at something more like 1% (-40 dB) for a brief period. That amp would be distortion-limited, not power-supply limited as is the case for amps powered by regulated switching power supplies. That assumption has never been measured that I've been able to find, so assumption it remains. In any case, the amplifier reviewed in this thread provides more power, and the 502 version much more power, even taking the "continuous" power output with the assumption of no headroom.
Rick "not seeing much that's more powerful at just about any price" Denney