Great news, if ready for prime time will you be posting all the test results here so we see how the new design performs? As Rick's reputation gives many folks high confidence in his testing capabilities.
Do you mind sharing the member here who helped you make all the new boards? As their reputation and the testing results will go a long way in establishing the new boards as a winner out of the gate.
As Amir's testing has shown (and he has stated in his video) the input board/chips can really lower performance if not implemented well.
Thanks for the kind words, but want to manage some expectations on my measurements:
- While my Quantasylum test equipment is capable of many of the same tests as Amir does, it is not as quiet. My test goal is to look for potential flaws or inconsistencies in a product implementation. Consider my role to be more quality control with respect to testing Buckeye product. The designer should be verifying his performance goals are met before my testing commences.
- I had an incident with my QA451 dummy load over the weekend and it will need to go in for repair. Am still assessing the impact but have created a more robust dummy load for testing in the meanwhile. So for now, I am limping along and am confident about using my current rig to test for relative performance. I would not recommend using my numbers for accurate SINAD at this time.
Hope this helps!
Rick
Last edited: