The screen name and attitude was a dead giveaway, but we all knew it would eventually end up in a meltdown one way or another.
Next time you suspect send us a report. We could have caught this sooner. And reduced the BS factor. Unless you secretly enjoy the chaos.I always had suspicion about said Member being someone else we all know and love...
I just didn't want to come across as crying wolf or be seen as trying to silence criticism of my products had I turned out to be wrong.Next time you suspect send us a report. We could have caught this sooner. And reduced the BS factor. Unless you secretly enjoy the chaos.![]()
Returned the AP last year for refund.@Buckeye Amps Now, since I'm too lazy to read back, I am curious where the AP analyzer and updated measurements stand?
Why not share the measurements?Returned the AP last year for refund.
New measurements have been confirmed and mono's will be back to Stereophile for retesting soon.
Thanks Dylan, I remembered that, but missed what you are using to replace it? Cosmos or something like it? Or third-party test lab?Returned the AP last year for refund.
New measurements have been confirmed and mono's will be back to Stereophile for retesting soon.
The E1DA Cosmos, yes.Thanks Dylan, I remembered that, but missed what you are using to replace it? Cosmos or something like it? Or third-party test lab?
Starts climbing in distortion about about 420, to 425 watts (into 8 ohms), and hits 1% really close to 450Can anybody with access to the stereophile review spoil what the 8-ohm 1% THD figure is? A rough guess of where the elbow on the 8-ohm graph is would also be helpful.
If we're talking about the same review, I thought it was very positive.Buckeye hasn't advertised enough in stereophile?
I'm just going to let the follow-up Stereophile review/measurements do the talking when they come outSo, any new measurements to share @Buckeye Amps ?
I assume that is at 1 kHz?Starts climbing in distortion about about 420, to 425 watts (into 8 ohms), and hits 1% really close to 450
Purifi modules have more or less constant power and distortion at all audio frequencies. As long as the preceding buffer output voltage is nowhere near saturation, the amp should produce those stated powers at any audio frequency... my 2 cents!I assume that is at 1 kHz?
Yeah buy… With a generally rising distortion versus frequency the SINAD numbers may be dependant upon the chosen frequencyPurifi modules have more or less constant power and distortion at all audio frequencies. As long as the preceding buffer output voltage is nowhere near saturation, the amp should produce those stated powers at any audio frequency... my 2 cents!
I dunno…Quick question. If the rising frequency is there for Purifi 9040, then why pay for the Purifi 9040 over Icepower or Nlai if use case is only below 1khz?
Yeah buy… With a generally rising distortion versus frequency the SINAD numbers may be dependant upon the chosen frequency
^Yep^ - and other amp topologies can be “less flat”, and raising up like when the Wagner is playing at a rally… and not bending back down after 5kHz.View attachment 428187
The chart above from the 9040BA datasheet shows a ultra low distortion that is more or less stable with frequency for a given output power. Taking the 10W spec (grey line) for example, the distortion + noise is flat with frequency at -120dB (SINAD = 120dB). But adding a preceding buffer will change this dynamic and become the gating factor of the amps distortion performance. since not all buffers are made equal.