Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
No amount of advertising can achieve this level of trust in a brand. We'll done Buckeye and thanks again Amir! Very interesting to see the powercube load measurements, although I'm not entirely sure how to read them yet. Consistency is most important I guess?
What were you thinking?? Why go the extra mile to have an input board built (that many of us requested btw) that decimates the pristine performance of the module?
Yeah, the margin has been commented on in other threads. Not precise numbers but mentions that it's quite small. A guy who resells the amps as well as the guy that runs the company have both commented.
And yeah, that's fine to do, obviously. I'm just stating why people may frustrated by it. It's tough to compete with people who are essentially giving away their time - at least compared to traditional hifi design/sales.
That's not saying that it shouldn't be commodity. Just saying that it may be hard for people to adjust.
The only reason the distortion was discovered was through Amir’s testing, not audibly (i.e. with evidence). So if a claim is made *without evidence*, it should be treated with caution.
OK, more feedback on the reactive load measurements. The scale for the "level" is way to large. I would say that many wouldn't be so happy of giving up half the power in a reactive corner, yet the chosen scale is covering 45 dB. I think that 6 dB (i.e. 6 volts here) would be a proper total scale normally and or worse offender it could be changes with a big "NB"...
As performance is improving generally, test need to be more challenging in order to weed out the king of the crops. Audible or not - this is science - right?
And reactance test for multi-tone... that would be really interesting to see...
I would welcome a "state of the nation" article from you about the measurement resolution and a general discussion on the way forward for the measurement suite. And again, in the name of science, not so much what can be heard but rather a discussion of how measurement could be improved to really secure that a perfect DUT can be separated from the less good ones - now that "everything" is starting to measure "fantastic" (with todays standard...)
Different modules in the 8 channel. More channels don't mean more distortion if you are using separate modules for every one or two channels. What you are confused about might be how certain DAC chips can handle multiple channels but you can combine them to create one channel with higher performance.
I am afraid that the impact of reactive load is generally not well understood. Their impact is to peak power dissipation of output transistors, their safe operating area. Not that much on distortion, and paradoxically, at much reduced distortion you get high peak power stress. Let's open a new thread for this. Some thumbnails attached. Peak power is high at the area where impedance magnitude seems to be high enough. EPDR and phase are telling the story. EPDR plot should be a part of every speaker impedance measurement, as it defines amplifier stress.
FWIW: My prices do include labor but at a level I would assume is well below what comparable companies in the industry might charge (i.e. those where the owners are also doing their own labor work).
From Day 1 I have thoroughly enjoyed putting these amps together, much like how I used to assemble models as a hobby for fun. I boot up a new series/show/movie and just work. So I have never found the need to apply a large premium to my time.
If you enjoy what you do, it isn't work in the traditional sense.
FWIW: My prices do include labor but at a level I would assume is well below what comparable companies in the industry might charge (i.e. those where the owners are also doing their own labor work).
From Day 1 I have thoroughly enjoyed putting these amps together, much like how I used to assemble models as a hobby for fun. I boot up a new series/show/movie and just work. So I have never found the need to apply a large premium to my time.
If you enjoy what you do, it isn't work in the traditional sense.
State of the art performance + rock bottom prices = market dominance.
Amazing that there are still people out there willing to pay 4-5-10 x the price of these amps for amps with less performance. Then again, there will always be those who value form over substance.
FWIW: My prices do include labor but at a level I would assume is well below what comparable companies in the industry might charge (i.e. those where the owners are also doing their own labor work).
From Day 1 I have thoroughly enjoyed putting these amps together, much like how I used to assemble models as a hobby for fun. I boot up a new series/show/movie and just work. So I have never found the need to apply a large premium to my time.
If you enjoy what you do, it isn't work in the traditional sense.
FWIW: My prices do include labor but at a level I would assume is well below what comparable companies in the industry might charge (i.e. those where the owners are also doing their own labor work).
From Day 1 I have thoroughly enjoyed putting these amps together, much like how I used to assemble models as a hobby for fun. I boot up a new series/show/movie and just work. So I have never found the need to apply a large premium to my time.
If you enjoy what you do, it isn't work in the traditional sense.
and I super appreciate what you do. In the other comments I was simply trying to help people understand why it may frustrate other people who want to run it more like a traditional audio business.