• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Buckeye 3 Channel Purifi Amplifier Review (2nd)

Rate this Multichannel Amplifier

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 5 1.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 24 8.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 255 88.9%

  • Total voters
    287
Seems odd to offer the security of speakON yet cheap out on non-locking XLRs. If I wanted weak friction fit connections I’d still be using RCAs. But I don’t and I’m not.
As clarification, we definitely did not cheap out. They are still Neutrik brand but instead of their latch model these are their spring tension model. So it isn’t friction of the pins holding the connection.
 
As clarification, we definitely did not cheap out. They are still Neutrik brand but instead of their latch model these are their spring tension model. So it isn’t friction of the pins holding the connection.

Are latching xlr connectors an upgrade option?
 
Are latching xlr connectors an upgrade option?
They are not.

The spring tension model from Neutrik we use are meant for thousands of insert/removal cycles while still maintaining perfect contact in professional settings so I can assure everyone there is no need to worry about signal issues/loss of contact, etc.
 
They are not.

The spring tension model from Neutrik we use are meant for thousands of insert/removal cycles while still maintaining perfect contact in professional settings so I can assure everyone there is no need to worry about signal issues/loss of contact, etc.

Actually I wasn't even aware that a non-latching xlr was available...
Do the latching style need a different cut out in the rear panel?
 
Actually I wasn't even aware that a non-latching xlr was available...
Do the latching style need a different cut out in the rear panel?
No, they use the same cutouts. But the XLR connections are directly mated to the input board so not something to be changed except during production runs.
 
No, they use the same cutouts. But the XLR connections are directly mated to the input board so not something to be changed except during production runs.

Does this apply only to the Purifi amps or to the Hypex NCx as well?
 
When Amir refers to the 1 and 3 channels cross talk, is this in reference to having the center channel idle or not in use.

Or

Does the crosstalk change between 1 and 3 channels if all three are being used?
 
I like the understated aesthetic.
I would much rather have a simple Buckeye enclosure with the rack mount option instead of the ridiculously over baked D'Agostino look.

View attachment 279443View attachment 279445
I'll confess that I'm quite a fan of the little meters with the look of a watch movement... But the rest is just too much. Especially the price. Did I mention the price? Good grief. And the Buckeye looks nice and clean.
 
Last edited:
Curious as to why you went with the non-latching version. I always thought that latching was a key feature of the XLR and another advantage over the RCA type plug.
I have plugged and unplugged both of my Buckeye amps many times, as I've changed the position of the amps a couple of times and also inserted a power sequencer lately and I can say with confidence there is a very snug fit that will not come out without some effort. Personally I do not like locking XLR's, as it's sometimes difficult to get one's fingers on the tab when attempting to unlock them-for my use case. Also note most DAC's and HP amps I have do not use locking XLR sockets.
 
I have plugged and unplugged both of my Buckeye amps many times, as I've changed the position of the amps a couple of times and also inserted a power sequencer lately and I can say with confidence there is a very snug fit that will not come out without some effort. Personally I do not like locking XLR's, as it's sometimes difficult to get one's fingers on the tab when attempting to unlock them-for my use case. Also note most DAC's and HP amps I have do not use locking XLR sockets.

Appreciate the feedback. Your experience is counter to mine however in that all the amps and dacs I have used have always had locking XLR plugs. Like I said, it would seem to be clear advantage over RCA plugs and can't imagine why anyone would choose to use the unlocking type in this application. Curious why they were chosen...
 
Now only if this vendor would offer a discount
I believe he has a sale on as we type. Peruse.

 
Appreciate the feedback. Your experience is counter to mine however in that all the amps and dacs I have used have always had locking XLR plugs. Like I said, it would seem to be clear advantage over RCA plugs and can't imagine why anyone would choose to use the unlocking type in this application. Curious why they were chosen...
The clear advantage is XLR being a balanced connection vs RCA being an unbalanced. The connection mechanism is rather moot, since Neutrik offers both.

As stated, these are official Neutrik connectors and are the exact same performing as the latching variation.
 
The clear advantage is XLR being a balanced connection vs RCA being an unbalanced. The connection mechanism is rather moot, since Neutrik offers both.

As stated, these are official Neutrik connectors and are the exact same performing as the latching variation.

Of course I am aware of the signal advantages of a balanced connection over single ended, that should go without saying. My comment concerns the mechanical advantage of a locking connection. If one does some reading on pro audio sites, one will find comments about non latching versus latching XLR plugs from a practical standpoint and appropriate uses for each. Comments on pro audio sites mention non latching connections loosening and relate instances when they have advantages, such as circumstances where latching connectors can make cables trip hazards.

One could just as easily say the connection mechanism is not moot since Neutrik offers both. Be that as it may, the fact that they offer both doesn't explain why you chose the non latching type instead of the latching type. Just sayin'....Still curious as to why the non latching type was chosen as I am sure you have a reason, I just can't imagine what it would be...
 
Of course I am aware of the signal advantages of a balanced connection over single ended, that should go without saying. My comment concerns the mechanical advantage of a locking connection. If one does some reading on pro audio sites, one will find comments about non latching versus latching XLR plugs from a practical standpoint and appropriate uses for each. Comments on pro audio sites mention non latching connections loosening and relate instances when they have advantages, such as circumstances where latching connectors can make cables trip hazards.

One could just as easily say the connection mechanism is not moot since Neutrik offers both. Be that as it may, the fact that they offer both doesn't explain why you chose the non latching type instead of the latching type. Just sayin'....Still curious as to why the non latching type was chosen.
I'll speak for myself-if he only offered locking XLR's I probably would look elsewhere, as I find them a PITA.
 
I'll speak for myself-if he only offered locking XLR's I probably would look elsewhere, as I find them a PITA.

I plan to order two 3 channel NCx amps in the next week or so and while I am surprised and disappointed that these amps do not use locking XLR connectors, I wouldn't consider that alone as any kind of deal breaker...
 
Back
Top Bottom