• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Buckeye 3 Channel Purifi Amp Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 19 7.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 66 24.2%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 151 55.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 37 13.6%

  • Total voters
    273

Head_Unit

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
1,259
Likes
626
If it had to be returned to be fixed (say the customer doesn't want to or isn't comfortable opening it up) I would obviously cover shipping costs.
I gotta pinch myself that I'm really reading this. Consdering the good service, what's a little rising THD between friends? Heck you can just reprogram the government micronanobots in the COVID and flue and shingles vaccines to allow you to ignore it...
 

Too Many Notes

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Messages
51
Likes
140
Correct, am still investigating this but here is what I found from a Sound Stage interview of Lars Risbo of Purifi…

Purifies reliance on speakONs intrigued me, so I asked them about it. Lars Risbo:​

Nearly all binding posts and/or banana plugs available we found to be magnetic and added measurable hysteric distortion. The cheapest plastic speakON passed the test. It seems that Benchmark Media Systems came to the same conclusion with their very low distortion AHB2 amplifier.​

I have quoted some of your post for that very reason. Being Technically correct, reliable and also in my experience objectively presented without coloration from personal bias.

And yes, the steel thing is a non issue, obviously at the other end of the speaker cables connected to that Buckeye amp there is going to be a loudspeaker driver of some sort. The material in the terminals of that driver is not going to be even remotely relevant for the performance of said driver because it has so many other shortcomings that dwarfs whatever little impact the terminal material could have

But it is easy to forget sometimes that whatever the equipment and regardless of how good they measure, the real bottle neck are the speakers, and for the most part they are not going to be anywhere near as revealing as an AP analyzer :)

This changes everything. Dylan, please create a guide on how to replace the steel binding posts in our speakers with your brass tabs.
 
Last edited:

Home Theater Nerd

New Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2022
Messages
1
Likes
14
I've been using a Buckeye 3-channel Purifi amp for five months now and it has been outstanding. I have very efficient, transparent speakers and the power has been crystal clear without a hint of noise or distortion. As an end user I can attest that the issues detected in this thread have been totally inaudible. Nonetheless, I sent Dylan an email when he announced the fix and he got replacement parts out to me within about a week. Following the posted instructions was a cinch - it took longer to take the amp out of the rack than to pop the cover and swap the tabs and nuts. I got it back up and running last night and it sounds ... exactly the same (crystal clear without a hint of noise or distortion).

I also remember that Dylan's first response to this inaudible issue, before he troubleshot the cause and knew the cost to him, was to promise to make it right at no cost the end user. Even if it meant him replacing the boards - and even if it meant him covering shipping! @Buckeye Amps , thanks for the fantastic customer service, I'll be buying more amps from you!
 

walt99

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
156
Likes
182
Location
DFW
Dylan, enjoying my 8ch 252 and I appreciate what you are doing, keep up the good work!
Now I’m thinking of going to an 8ch Purify, any options there?
 

Buckeye Amps

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Forum Donor
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
1,440
Likes
5,704
Dylan, enjoying my 8ch 252 and I appreciate what you are doing, keep up the good work!
Now I’m thinking of going to an 8ch Purify, any options there?
Not from me, to be upfront and honest.

In an effort to always be honest and save my customers money I can say that there is almost zero audible gain using something like the Purifi or the new NCx Hypex outside of the front three channels.

MAYBE if someone listens critically to 5ch music using a Purifi for the two surround speakers MIGHT produce a very very subtle improvement. But in 99 out of 100 use cases, I urge customers to save the money and not pay more for Purifi outside of their LCR speakers.
 

Too Many Notes

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Messages
51
Likes
140
Correct, am still investigating this but here is what I found from a Sound Stage interview of Lars Risbo of Purifi…

Purifies reliance on speakONs intrigued me, so I asked them about it. Lars Risbo:​

Nearly all binding posts and/or banana plugs available we found to be magnetic and added measurable hysteric distortion. The cheapest plastic speakON passed the test. It seems that Benchmark Media Systems came to the same conclusion with their very low distortion AHB2 amplifier.​

Previous joking aside, this intrigues me the more I think about it. In theory, could the measurable distortion added by the above components be higher than, say, the extra distortion measured by Amir that was caused by the previously installed steel tabs? In other words, could replacing the tabs in the Buckeye be a complete waste of time if one otherwise uses banana plugs or has speakers with binding posts?
 

Calleberg

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2021
Messages
97
Likes
128
Location
Sweden
Previous joking aside, this intrigues me the more I think about it. In theory, could the measurable distortion added by the above components be higher than, say, the extra distortion measured by Amir that was caused by the previously installed steel tabs? In other words, could replacing the tabs in the Buckeye be a complete waste of time if one otherwise uses banana plugs or has speakers with binding posts?

Dont forget the connectors on the drivers inside the speakers. 99 times out of 100 its a faston on a STEEL tab... ahh the horror.... :cool:
 
Last edited:

Buckeye Amps

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Forum Donor
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
1,440
Likes
5,704
I would suggest not worrying about such rabbit holes.

The goal is for the known components to measure/operate as intended. Hence me wanting to fix the Purifi and get the appropriate/expected measurements.

But to start to ruminate on “is the source before or after the amp introducing distortion in the form of steel/magnetic components” is an exercise in futility. There are dozens of other things in our hobby that make more audible differences to put thought into.
 

Rick Sykora

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
3,024
Likes
5,836
Location
Stow, Ohio USA
Previous joking aside, this intrigues me the more I think about it. In theory, could the measurable distortion added by the above components be higher than, say, the extra distortion measured by Amir that was caused by the previously installed steel tabs? In other words, could replacing the tabs in the Buckeye be a complete waste of time if one otherwise uses banana plugs or has speakers with binding posts?

The speaker distortion is so much higher than these hysteric (micro)distortions, it does seem rather obsessive to go chasing after them aggressively. From a practical perspective, they are unlikely to be audible.

My investigation has been to further my understanding of what I consider to be an electrical outlier. As I posted earlier, I was caught off guard when troubleshooting the problem as I unwittingly placed another steel tab in the signal path. For the record, am not ripping open any of my speakers to replace steel parts. :cool:
 
Last edited:

charlielaub

Active Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2023
Messages
116
Likes
160
Dont forget the connectors on the drivers inside the speakers. 99 times out of 100 its a faston on a STEEL tab... ahh the horror....
Sure but a driver, even a really good one, has 100 times or more the distortion of a good amplifier. So the added distortion from a steel tab is insignificant to the drivers' own distortion levels.

Edit: I just saw that others mentioned this before me.
 

Calleberg

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2021
Messages
97
Likes
128
Location
Sweden
Sure but a driver, even a really good one, has 100 times or more the distortion of a good amplifier. So the added distortion from a steel tab is insignificant to the drivers' own distortion levels.

Edit: I just saw that others mentioned this before me.

Yes, yes, that was my point too, but the smiley got deleted... :) Aah, there it is...
 
Last edited:

Hapo

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
464
Likes
315
...I can see where a person in the USA might as well get a Buckeye as a Nord...
 

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,054
Likes
2,710
Not from me, to be upfront and honest.

In an effort to always be honest and save my customers money I can say that there is almost zero audible gain using something like the Purifi or the new NCx Hypex outside of the front three channels.

MAYBE if someone listens critically to 5ch music using a Purifi for the two surround speakers MIGHT produce a very very subtle improvement. But in 99 out of 100 use cases, I urge customers to save the money and not pay more for Purifi outside of their LCR speakers.
There are a few really good options in other brands. I have the NAD M27 (NC400 based) but there is also the M28 (Purifi based)... It makes sense For those that like all the same speakers and amps on their bed layer. Not sure how many would like it but I think there certainly is a market of some type out there. :)
 

Buckeye Amps

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Forum Donor
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
1,440
Likes
5,704
There are a few really good options in other brands. I have the NAD M27 (NC400 based) but there is also the M28 (Purifi based)... It makes sense For those that like all the same speakers and amps on their bed layer. Not sure how many would like it but I think there certainly is a market of some type out there. :)
I guess a phobia of multiple cases is an issue for some? Otherwise for the price of an M28 you could get 10ch of Purifi from me
 

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,054
Likes
2,710
I guess a phobia of multiple cases is an issue for some? Otherwise for the price of an M28 you could get 10ch of Purifi from me
Very true. And certainly could do that. I do like fewer cases though. Used M27 seems to run around $2500 ish, but you do make a good point :)
 

Buckeye Amps

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Forum Donor
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
1,440
Likes
5,704
Very true. And certainly could do that. I do like fewer cases though. Used M27 seems to run around $2500 ish, but you do make a good point :)
Again, it more so comes down to why to me. Save the money on something that will not be heard in the surround channels, even with multich music.
 

Dj7675

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
2,054
Likes
2,710
Again, it more so comes down to why to me. Save the money on something that will not be heard in the surround channels, even with multich music.
Some just want to choose to put the best amplification on each bed layer. Simple as that. In particular those running setups for multi channel music but also for high end theater installs. Could certainly be seen as unneccary by some for sure but some stil want it as shown by the existence of M27/m28 and other brands/modesl that have 7/8 channels.
 
Top Bottom