Bob from Florida
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,887
- Likes
- 2,151
Titanium is more expensive than stainless, however, the choice is not totally cost. Reference for reading from quick Google search - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568430/I am also a little bit worried about future possibility of MRI diagnosis on you for any objective/reason.
Usually titanium (and titanium alloys) are safe in MRI imaging, but stainless steel is usually categorized as ”contraindications" for MRI...
For some MRI reference - one source here -
https://mriquestions.com/orthopedic-hardware.html
Any metal implants in current use today will be sufficiently non-ferrous, that means non-magnetic enough, to avoid being attracted to the magnet. The real issue with MRI scanning and metal implants is two-fold - heating from RF absorption and Eddy currents generated from Gradient coil pulses. RF causes heating- think of the MRI as a big microwave oven while scanning. The scanner keeps track of this based on patient weight, room temperature, and scanning protocols (faster scanning results in higher average RF power over time. The scanner calculates overall patient warming, based on these variables, to avoid “cooking the patient”. If the calculated heat is too high a “pause” in scanning will occur to allow the patient to “cool“. Metal implants, mass and conductivity dependent, can cause localized heating that won’t be accounted for by these calculations. Be sure to fill out your MRI questionnaire accurately when answering the question about implants for MRI scanning suitability. Eddy currents cause two different issues. First, the changing magnetic field caused by the Gradient pulses causes current flow in the metal at 90 degrees to the changing magnetic fields. This current flow generates its own magnetic field that is also 90 degrees to the direction of the Eddy currents. The magnetic field generated by the Eddy currents is now in a direction that interacts with the main magnetic field of the magnet. This tends to make the metal object “jump a bit“ during gradient pulses. Cardiac stents are of concern here due to localized RF heating and Eddy currents and can be restricted to lower strength magnets. Moving the patient into the bore also generates Eddy currents in metal which makes the metal want to stay in place during movement. Faster motion increases this effect. The second major Eddy currents issue with metal implants is the small magnet field generated by the Eddies will slightly change the field strength at the location of the implant. MRI imaging depends on precise field strength at any given location in the imaging slice. The RF frequency absorbed by Hydrogen during the transmit time depends on the field strength. During the receive time, the Hydrogen emits the same frequency it absorbed. If the magnetic field strength is not what is expected, then the RF echoes are the wrong frequency and will not be displayed in the correct physical location. Metal implants often show a signal ”void” around their location.
Electronic devices, such as pacemakers, are certified by the OEM for suitability based on field strength of the Magnet. Depending on the device, it may be certified for use in a 1.5T but not in a 3T. The major concern - after malfunctions caused by RF and Eddy currents - is burns caused by RF heating.
In short, Doodski’s metal repair parts will not likely cause any issues with MRI scanning except for signal “voids” around the parts in images of his arm.