• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Bowers & Wilkins 607 S2 Anniversary Edition Review

Xulonn

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
1,828
Likes
6,311
Location
Boquete, Chiriqui, Panama
Such blasphemy! Surely the audiophile gods will soon send a bolt of lightning to prevent the...
Sacred Cow.jpg
 

respice finem

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
1,867
Likes
3,775
And, even the "ancient" B&W CDM7 I'm still using in my 5.1.2 setup are better made (rounded edges etc.)... Seems not to be the old B&W any more.
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,292
Likes
3,880
Not surprised one bit. All measurements published out there about B&W speakers (600s and 700s) always showed terrible performance.

This is just confirming what we already knew.
Yep, it seems they literally don't give a shit about sound quality and just want to ride their brandname. But the worst part is that when you recommend people not to get B&W speakers and look for something better they just think you are trolling.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,586
Likes
38,284
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
@amirm I think if you are going to call out a speaker's country of manufacture (China), you should do it for all speakers you review, including all the Revels. Otherwise you could be accused of possible bias... ;)

We need to have a few more B&Ws reviewed to see if this HF "zing" is indeed part of their deliberate "house sound". I have a pair of their larger and older 602 S2s (Made in the UK before the Sound United buyout) here and they are very well behaved in the HF.
 

MrPeabody

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
942
Location
USA
Unstinking believable.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,314
Likes
4,427
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
The original 601 was a little bit 'boom and tizz,' but not excessive and after ten yeares, the tweeter tamed for whatever reason. the V2 bit my ears off I remember, the slightly undamped 'glossy' quality replaced by a razor sharp sizzle. I've only listened briefly to the odd subsequent model but it seems a presence dip followed by the tweeter taking off has become the family sound, even in the N800 series. Obviously intentional I reckon and PMC's domestic models seem to copy that balance - their fans seem to lap it up.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,314
Likes
4,427
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
@amirm I think if you are going to call out a speaker's country of manufacture (China), you should do it for all speakers you review, including all the Revels. Otherwise you could be accused of possible bias... ;)

We need to have a few more B&Ws reviewed to see if this HF "zing" is indeed part of their deliberate "house sound". I have a pair of their larger and older 602 S2s (Made in the UK before the Sound United buyout) here and they are very well behaved in the HF.

I think age has mellowed them, 'cos they weren't too polite when new - the bass was a bit 'woofy' as well... Oh damn, maybe I'm thinking of the V3 model which tautened the bass I seem to recall. The competing cheaper KEF Q models went from a restrained hf to a 5dB or so lift as well.
 

MZKM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
4,244
Likes
11,485
Location
Land O’ Lakes, FL
@amirm I think if you are going to call out a speaker's country of manufacture (China), you should do it for all speakers you review, including all the Revels. Otherwise you could be accused of possible bias... ;)

We need to have a few more B&Ws reviewed to see if this HF "zing" is indeed part of their deliberate "house sound". I have a pair of their larger and older 602 S2s (Made in the UK before the Sound United buyout) here and they are very well behaved in the HF.
See post #3
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,762
Likes
16,227
We need to have a few more B&Ws reviewed to see if this HF "zing" is indeed part of their deliberate "house sound". I have a pair of their larger and older 602 S2s (Made in the UK before the Sound United buyout) here and they are very well behaved in the HF.
Those 602 S2 belong to the older B&W era which has high order crossovers and a more neutral tuning than their current models, for example the 20 year old 603 S3

1616282076160.png


1616281995265.png

(source: https://www.stereophile.com/content/bowers-wilkins-702-s2-loudspeaker-measurements )

vs the current more expensive 705 S2

1616282102153.png


1616282112515.png

(source: https://www.stereophile.com/content/bw-dm603-s3-loudspeaker-measurements)

B&W changed completely their tuning strategy at some time for whichever reasons but they are not less successful in the market, so I don't think it is not they cannot do better if they would want to, but rather an intentional choice.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,314
Likes
4,427
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
That 10kHz spike really is or was audible and not nice I remember... Don't they use first order slopes?
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,586
Likes
38,284
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
That 10kHz spike really is or was audible and not nice I remember... Don't they use first order slopes?

I can't remember what the X/over is. I'll unscrew it and post a pic of the 602 S2.
 

digitalfrost

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
1,521
Likes
3,086
Location
Palatinate, Germany
B&W changed completely their tuning strategy at some time for whichever reasons but they are not less successful in the market, so I don't think it is not they cannot do better if they would want to, but rather an intentional choice.
We auditioned the B&W 684 and the 684 S2. We all agreed that the older model sounded better. Model change was ~ 2014.
 

sarakyel

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2020
Messages
15
Likes
50
Location
Finland
Over the last 15 years I spent quite some time working in recording studios, both in the UK and US. I've always been surprised to find those huge B&W speakers in control rooms (Diamond... 800 I think?). Regardless of how massive and crazy expensive these boxes are, they have such a distinctive shrill sound signature... Sitting down for a whole day in front of these things - even 3+ meters away - is super exhausting. Feels like the sound is drilling through your brain. I even remember a VO recording session where those speakers clearly affected the voice tone of an actress, almost as if she was being pitch-shifted in real time. Switching the the small nearfield Mackie speakers we had on the mixing desk magically fixed the issue.

Now whenever I hear B&W speakers, I can't help but frown. How can people genuinely enjoy that?
 

KarVi71

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
63
Likes
68
I attended a speaker demo in the local hifi shop, where the listeners were asked to compare these B&W's and a set of Dali Oberon 1's.

After which we could fill out a questionaire as to which speaker we preferred.

The comparison was with many different music types, and at various listening levels. They even took requests :)
While not exactly scientific in nature, we did compare the speakers with the same music, driven by the same amp, while attempting to hit the same volume on each.

At this event I found the B&W's to be revealing, but also "sharp", and a little bit "thin" to their sound.
The Dali's were also revealing, but much more pleasant with more "body". Much more balanced, I thought.

The event was actually quite entertaining, and there was a lot of discussion about music and music genres.

A few days later I visited the shop to learn the results of the questionaires. To my surprise about 30% of the listeners liked the B&W's the most.
The Dali's won by a large %, but I was very surprised that so many preferred the B&W's. I did not like these B&W's very much.

Just goes to show that tastes are really very different :)
 
Last edited:

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,762
Likes
16,227
Now whenever I hear B&W speakers, I can't help but frown. How can people genuinely enjoy that?
Guess often older audiophiles that listen at lower levels and stuff like 60s vinyl, also their presence dips makes shrill recordings sound less shouty.
 

digicidal

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
1,981
Likes
4,838
Location
Sin City, NV
Sad day for anyone that owns these.

I'm not sure I would go that far... the flaws (and they are many) of this speaker should be clearly audible.
So there's only two possibilities:
  1. You like them - either because you want "sizzle and bang" without EQ, or because you are more interested in brand and aesthetics.
  2. You hated them already - in which case you likely already returned them after an audition.
In either case, a bad review shouldn't matter to you all that much. Now if you said "it's a sad day for B&W"... that would be true - it's just that they clearly intended much of what's wrong here objectively. Many of their other speakers exhibit similar characteristics.
 
Top Bottom