• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Bluetooth receiver (low latency) with XLR output - any recommendation?

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
15,520
Likes
34,943
We're finally finishing "phase 2" of a sound reinforcement upgrade at our church.
We have a moderate-sized (capacity ca. 80-100 people) "parish hall" space that was wired up a little before COVID with four 70 V speakers connected to our "house" (sanctuary) PA amp. THe room also was wired with a pair of unbalanced inputs to get an audio signal (e.g., analog stereo output from a computer, or, say, the output of a wireless microphone's receiver) to the aforementioned amp so that we could, e.g., watch & listen to a video in the parish hall.
A while back, we redid the house PA system. Our plan was to take the old (mono) PA amp, move it to the parish hall and set up a simple dedicated sound system in the hall. We did that today :) and all works fine.
The one remaining wrinkle: I'd like to add a Bluetooth receiver as an input for the amp, so that a visitor (e.g.) could stream audio to the hall PA system wirelessly (e..g, a Zumba class, which as it happens was meeting there while we were building the rack and installing the amp :)). In the perfect world*, I was wondering if there exists an affordable Bluetooth receiver with low enough latency to accommodate audio from a computer that's being used to stream video (i.e., to a projector) and get the audio to the hall amp and loudspeakers without a cable, but with reasonable audio/video synchronization). The latter's a nice to have, but I definitely want to add some BT audio support, of reasonable quality, assuming the cost isn't too bad.

A quick look at B&H Photo turns up gizmos like these, which look promising (and are reasonably priced) -- but what do I know?
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/prod...ft_318bt_phantom_powered_bluetooth_audio.html (I like the fact it's a brand name I know, even though I know it might just be a "badge engineered" generic dongle)
1751306893862.jpeg
... or this (similar but a totally unknown-to-me brand)
1751307130824.jpeg
Any and all advice and suggestions (even pithy ones!) is (are?) greatly appreciated and gratefully accepted.
Thanks for your consideration! :)

_________________
* re: nice to haves...
Id like a pony .jpg
 
Do you need Mono summing functionality, like the products in your links provide?
 
Do you need Mono summing functionality, like the products in your links provide?
Yes, as a matter of fact, thanks for asking! :)
In this case, it would be ideal to sum-to-mono, although I think that the amp (a rather unimpressive "episode" brand "100 watt" mono PA/sound reinforcement amp) can sum stereo to mono, too. It has stereo pair unbalanced inputs on the back, as well as single unbalanced inputs, IIRC, for line-level sources.

EDIT:
PS after posting, I found this TASCAM, which costs more but looks more substantial and thus I infer ;) pretty promising (and still isn't what I'd consider expensive).

1751310449232.jpeg
 
to accommodate audio from a computer that's being used to stream video (i.e., to a projector) and get the audio to the hall amp and loudspeakers without a cable, but with reasonable audio/video synchronization

You wouldn't use Bluetooth for that, but an RF rx/tx system. like the ones used on stages
 
re: @dasdoing's comment above
We might then just stick with wired connection for sound from a streamed video. That is the way we've been doing it to date. I do think some other uses of audio support in the hall will benefit from BT being available.
 
Back
Top Bottom