Galliardist
Major Contributor
To qualify my remark, you are entitled like everyone else to like any particular product. I'm not challenging that.To me is perfect
What I am saying is that the remarkable technical claims for QRONO are unproven, and in the light of what MQA's previous product didn't do, claiming anything objectively special is remarkable and demands proper evidence.
Lenbrook and their MQA subidiary have not given that, and we have no independent evidence for their claims. And one or two people liking the product is not that evidence for those claims.
No you aren't. You are a consumer expressing a personal preference. From the small sample of reports we have here, quality control might not be that great. We're already greeted here by problem devices including one with a dead display, remember?At last we are the quality control.