Forget the blatant problems with Dirac .. and tone controls and eq
Last edited:
With around -60dB (0.1%) at 500Hz, 1.5kHz, 2.5kHz and so on ?Is it audible?
Try the same with bass control -0.5dB, please.112.0 dB SINAD with tone controls on
(-6 dBFS penalty for tone controls)
![]()
Wow, that's great and that's how my M33 does it tooDirac Live works with 192 kHz!
It's rather 20dB SINAD penalty, isn't it ?95.3 dB SINAD with Dirac On
(-10 dBFS penalty for Dirac)
![]()
Dirac Live works with 192 kHz!
Level is about 4dB lower from the rest as far as I see.It's rather 20dB SINAD penalty, isn't it ?
Or do you mean the level is 10dB lower ?
Nice to read it runs at 192kHz.
Try the same with bass control -0.5dB, please.
You'll see something interesting...
It's rather 20dB SINAD penalty, isn't it ?
Or do you mean the level is 10dB lower ?
Nice to read it runs at 192kHz.
I would add a measurement down to 40-50Hz with Dirac on,or a Multitone.Ok , interesting Dirac and -0.5 dB bass ??
No, just bass controlOk , interesting Dirac and -0.5 dB bass ??
No, just bass control
Well, try both.how bad would it be if we used both ?
Who uses this when you have the option of multiple Dirac Live presetsjust bass control
People who didn't purchase Dirac ?Who uses this when you have the option of multiple Dirac Live presets![]()
I cannot imagine who should not use this outstanding featurePeople who didn't purchase Dirac ?

You may count me as one.I cannot imagine who should not use this outstanding feature![]()
Ok. Will try tomorrow.Try the same with bass control -0.5dB, please.
You'll see something interesting...
I would add a measurement down to 40-50Hz with Dirac on,or a Multitone.
It's rather 20dB SINAD penalty, isn't it ?
Or do you mean the level is 10dB lower ?
While my Node Icon does great for XLR out, I only got 81.9 dB with Dirac on (with a real correction file in use) so it may very well be a huge RCA penalty that you see also seeing. But I will try this tomorrow if I have time.Here is what this gives me on the Node N132.
Just Tone control on and -0.5dB Bass.
Honestly, I might return Dirac since the raw performance is so good. The correction you see is just a single point measurement for testing purposes, but with multiple measurements across the actual multi-person social listening area, the actual bass response in the room averages out differently. My speakers are phase coherent which may also decrease the subjective benefits.I cannot imagine who should not use this outstanding feature![]()
That could be audible through a lot of headphone setups, definitely. I've mentioned my liking of music like solo classical guitar in the vinyl renaissance thread in light of my experience that it doesn't mask as well as other music, and it would apply here as well. Would the Icon be used for headphone listening though? Maybe for people who decide to believe in QRONO...With around -60dB (0.1%) at 500Hz, 1.5kHz, 2.5kHz and so on ?
It might be.
Masking effect is small on such IMD distortion, to my knowledge.
Might be worth a blind test, for once.
Just running the test signal (which you probably won't hear) and listening to the residual, maybe ?
(Be carefully not to fry your tweeter, though.)