Could you post a piece of the original?
-
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Blind taste test, different transfer equipment (jazz)
- Thread starter hvbias
- Start date
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
Ha! I much prefer the second file myself; it's much more intimate, I feel closer to the musicians...warmer invitation.
But that's me and my own preference between the two files that were presented; I just can't escape that beautiful reality.
I was certain that file number two was the tube one. I was 100% wrong on my choice. There must be something right that can be also measured on why I prefer the second file, but I just don't know.
Still, tube people are better love makers. And the rest must be living a dream.
Fabio, was he also a tube lover?
* That was a cool test Monsieur hvbias, I truly enjoyed it.
By the way, I don't have to sell my gear; it sounds wonderful, and warm.
But that's me and my own preference between the two files that were presented; I just can't escape that beautiful reality.
I was certain that file number two was the tube one. I was 100% wrong on my choice. There must be something right that can be also measured on why I prefer the second file, but I just don't know.
Still, tube people are better love makers. And the rest must be living a dream.
Fabio, was he also a tube lover?
* That was a cool test Monsieur hvbias, I truly enjoyed it.
By the way, I don't have to sell my gear; it sounds wonderful, and warm.
Just so I understand, by "correct choice" you mean file 2 was tube, file 1 was ss?
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
I don't know if it matters TBone, regarding the Dynamic Range measurements of the two files; because the second file still has the upper-hand to my sweet ears.
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
You and I Paul, are 100% in agreement.
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
No Paul; just the opposite way around. The file we both much much prefer is the SS one (Solid State).
Huh. Can someone with more knowledge/software than me do some sort of frequency analysis of the two tracks? Kinda like what Waldrep shows in a lot of his blog posts. I'm curious whether there's a measurable difference in the HF region that would account for what I heard.
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
Ray posted this two weeks ago: ttp://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/blind-taste-test-different-transfer-equipment-jazz.464/#post-11219
...And the OP's reply: http://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...erent-transfer-equipment-jazz.464/#post-11222
...And Frank's reply: http://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...erent-transfer-equipment-jazz.464/#post-11229
...And the OP's reply: http://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...erent-transfer-equipment-jazz.464/#post-11222
...And Frank's reply: http://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...erent-transfer-equipment-jazz.464/#post-11229
Yes, the SS version is presenting more information, the tube variation has "doctored" the sound to sound "nicer", to some ears. My preference is for more 'data' - the trade off is that if the playback is not good enough then an unpleasant edge will be heard, because the "complexity" of the sound is not being handled competently; the tube tarting up of the sound actually is moving the quality closer to baby food consistency - goes down easier, far less chance of being overtly offensive - but ultimately bland, unsatisfying.
NorthSky
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,998
- Likes
- 974
The second file is so much more pleasant...superior all around...there is no contest.
And I don't have a single clue of which one is the louder one. > And which one measures better.
But usually we prefer the loudest one, and the one with the smoothest frequency response, the better dynamic range, the lesser distortion, the higher resolution, the better mids, lows and highs, the better imaging, the warmest, ...all that Jazz.
So, who else also prefer the second file? ...And who knew that she was the SS one? That's what I'd like to know.
...Who are my true friends, and who are my best friends.
And I don't have a single clue of which one is the louder one. > And which one measures better.
But usually we prefer the loudest one, and the one with the smoothest frequency response, the better dynamic range, the lesser distortion, the higher resolution, the better mids, lows and highs, the better imaging, the warmest, ...all that Jazz.
So, who else also prefer the second file? ...And who knew that she was the SS one? That's what I'd like to know.
...Who are my true friends, and who are my best friends.
TBone
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
- Messages
- 1,191
- Likes
- 351
I don't know if it matters TBone, regarding the Dynamic Range measurements of the two files; because the second file still has the upper-hand to my sweet ears.
Well, I'm assuming each signal (file1,2) would be near-identically reproduced by the turntable itself, therefore from phono-stage(s) to recording stage, something changed the values. Personally, if it was my system(s), I'd like to know which version was more faithful to the original, regardless of which sounded "sweeter".
Also, since I've recently been considering using Lundahl transformers myself, the 1st thing that came to mind was the potential sonic effects of vastly different cartridge loading requirements?
Excellent
. All I heard was the tube version being more distorted. I don't hear the euphonic effect of tube. And that has been a theme for me for a while including LP versus CD. I just want clean reproduction.
- Thread Starter
- #58
You guys are fast to clarify the correct option is FILE 1 IS TUBE, FILE 2 IS SOLID STATE
I hope I address all your points, if not they'll have to be after the weekend... want to get up to the lake house at 6 am tomorrow.
@RayDunzl the original is a master tape dub, these are flat transfers from that tape
@NorthSky to my ears I am hearing quite a bit more high frequency and air in the tube file. Which I should have clarified in my post about it sounding more "live". The tube transfer also sounds more dynamic. I attend quite a few live jazz shows (by far my favorite genre of music) and to me that is how the cymbals, snare and sax sound in the upper registers. It doesn't sound as pleasant and glossed over EQ wise like it did on the SS transfer. Regarding your second post
@PaulyT I am hoping to learn about how to plot detailed frequency graphs. IMHO the ones that Audacity generates are not that great, even messing around with the various window settings.
Here are some files that a friend was able to do in ProTools, but that software is too expensive for me! These screenshots are not of the samples in this thread.
@TBone there is no vinyl involved, so there is no cartridge loading. Also a point of clarification these are output transformers (think OPTs like on a tube power amp or line stage) and are not input step up transformers.
@amirm thanks for giving your subjective opinion, yours was one I was looking forward to hearing. To hear the distortion was this on headphones or speakers? I will need to have a closer listen to the tube file to see if I can detect it. To me the major differences were the EQ and dynamics.
to clarify the correct option is FILE 1 IS TUBE, FILE 2 IS SOLID STATEI hope I address all your points, if not they'll have to be after the weekend... want to get up to the lake house at 6 am tomorrow.
@RayDunzl the original is a master tape dub, these are flat transfers from that tape
@NorthSky to my ears I am hearing quite a bit more high frequency and air in the tube file. Which I should have clarified in my post about it sounding more "live". The tube transfer also sounds more dynamic. I attend quite a few live jazz shows (by far my favorite genre of music) and to me that is how the cymbals, snare and sax sound in the upper registers. It doesn't sound as pleasant and glossed over EQ wise like it did on the SS transfer. Regarding your second post
@PaulyT I am hoping to learn about how to plot detailed frequency graphs. IMHO the ones that Audacity generates are not that great, even messing around with the various window settings.
Here are some files that a friend was able to do in ProTools, but that software is too expensive for me! These screenshots are not of the samples in this thread.
@TBone there is no vinyl involved, so there is no cartridge loading. Also a point of clarification these are output transformers (think OPTs like on a tube power amp or line stage) and are not input step up transformers.
@amirm thanks for giving your subjective opinion, yours was one I was looking forward to hearing. To hear the distortion was this on headphones or speakers? I will need to have a closer listen to the tube file to see if I can detect it. To me the major differences were the EQ and dynamics.
Similar threads
