DT150, DT250, DT240PRO, Custom One Pro, DT1350, T51 all did not have the 'Mount Beyer' peaks.For 100 years tradition, a bargain price IMHO. But such is the general state of affairs, so to speak.
I'm curious if we will see a BD without the (in)famous Beyer peak-
It is all a design compromise for certain preferences and use cases. A flaw to some is a boon for others.I can't understand why they didn't eradicate such an obvious issue in many recent models.
I have a friend that enjoys them like that. They know it exists and refuse to EQ them. Not my cup of tea, but the market for that tuning seems to exist.I can't understand why they didn't eradicate such an obvious issue in many recent models.
Yet to be seen whether it becomes a branding exercise.... after all Quad has now been chinese owned for years, but the Huntingdon facility (HQ / Factory / Workshop) is still there...It is all a design compromise for certain preferences and use cases. A flaw to some is a boon for others.
Shame to see yet another company with a lot of tradition lose its identity and become a branding exercise.
Actually, you will only hear it at the affected frequency, so it might not be apparent at all with some music.I have a friend that enjoys them like that. They know it exists and refuse to EQ them. Not my cup of tea, but the market for that tuning seems to exist.
Well, yes, but, sometimes such sales can produce a good outcome, if the buyer is no "locust" kind of investor.It is all a design compromise for certain preferences and use cases. A flaw to some is a boon for others.
Shame to see yet another company with a lot of tradition lose its identity and become a branding exercise.
Acc. to Beyerdynamic it is intentional because it is for professional usage and the headphone serves as a magnifying glass for details.I can't understand why they didn't eradicate such an obvious issue in many recent models.
So all the details "live" in that narrow peak, yeahAcc. to Beyerdynamic it is intentional because it is for professional usage and the headphone serves as a magnifying glass for details.
I dont think this means much. Before 2016 "everybody" was using the freebie dirtybuds included with iPods and Airpods are simply the updated version of those, but expensive enough to technically qualify as a major market force.Just to have an idea how small the hi-fi market has become: Airpods sold $18 billion in last year alone.
T1 mk2 has a wide and substantial treble peak from 7 to 15kHz (+7dB) so not narrow and exactly in the 'enhanced detail range' (6kHz to 12kHz)So all the details "live" in that narrow peak, yeah
Any excuse is better than none. I know similar excuses from some shooters, esp. hunters. No way in hell they missed. It was the gun, the ammo, the wind, solar flares, an unregistered earthquake...
I like my BDs mainly for the comfort, including the T1 Mk2 "flattenened" by Amir, but I EQ them, which I kind of don't need with my el cheapo AKG K371 or the Truthear Zeros.
But not their pro section which is still Sennheiser.BTW: Sennheiser is now Sonova. We wanted globalization, now we have it![]()
But, if I should follow the excuses, I would have to ask, is this really Hi-Fi? And such "tuning" included their "flagship" T1...T1 mk2 has a wide and substantial treble peak from 7 to 15kHz (+7dB) so not narrow and exactly in the 'enhanced detail range' (6kHz to 12kHz)
![]()
View attachment 467373
It only appears to be narrow on specific test fixtures (that should not be judged > 8kHz)
But with EQ they are indeed enjoyable and very comfortable with a lot of room for the ears (non pro have lower clamping force)
When using an EQ set to a narrow 8kHz peak you thus still have a lot of 'extra energy' in the 10-15kHz region (the frequency band where 'airiness' resides.