- Thread Starter
- #101
So you didn't mean to use the RAW frequency responses of the database? Or yes and it, like you said, flatten the response?
Because if so it is kinda different than use a compensation curve based on the Harman target ones and indeed the results; from your flattening method to using a impulse filter (targeted to have a Harman curve), will be different for obvious reasons.
I was aware of that I just wanted to try the new function
The raw measurement of the headphone frequency response (measured with no simulated ear, pinna, HRTF, and no Harman curves, etc.) will create a flat frequency response, compensating for any frequency errors of the headphones. That's what you would want to use when measuring threshold of hearing: flatten out the headphone frequency response.