• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Best Practices with DSP

terfenol-D

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Messages
41
Likes
20
I am attempting to integrate a sub (possibly) 2 using Lyngdorf's Roomperfect. I wanted to ask some questions about best practices in general with DSP. I currently have Kef R3 speakers and an SVS Micro 3000. I used Rew and moved my sub around potential locations until I got what I thought was the best REW chart for the sub alone. SVS recommended settings on their website state :

AV Receiver / Processor:​

Recommended Speaker/Subwoofer Crossover Frequency (Hz)80 Hz

Stereo Pre-Amplifier or Receiver:​

Recommended Low Pass Filter Frequency Setting (Hz)60 Hz
Recommended Low Pass Filter Slope (dB/octave)24 dB/octave

Questions for DSP are as follows:
  1. Are the SVS website settings for stereo pre-amp meant to be used in the SVS app so that the sub DSP is doing the low pass and slope? It reads to me like they are telling you to put those settings in your stereo pre-amp or receiver (assuming it has sub integration features).
  2. Would I use those settings and then use the sub's EQ feature to make as ideal test results as possible prior to running DSP? IE, use the 3 band EQ in SVS app to tame peaks and valleys associated with the sub first and then run the Lyngdorf DSP on top of that. I was worried that might result in the DSP trying to fight the EQ.
  3. I started with my sub at maximum volume and reduced volume until the REW chart showed valleys hitting house curve but nothing really below house curve. The result after DSP is that there is some boominess in men's voices when watching a show. My thinking was that I have heard it is always better to reduce peaks than try and fill valleys. I figured if I started with everything above the projected curve line the DSP could reduce peaks vs trying to fill valleys. Hopefully that makes sense. Here is the chart REW produced prior to my first attempt at DSP.
    1. 1718335866236.png
  4. Kef port plugs or no plus to run the roomperfect? The kef manual states to use the the ring ports (not fully closed off) for my distance from the wall. It seems to me it would be smart to follow Kef's instructions but they are not written for people who use DSP. Perhaps this is a function where I start with Rew first to see which is a better result and then go that way.
Sub Specific Hookup Questions -
  1. Right now my sub is hooked up using RCA with about a 12 foot distance using a sixteen feet cable. It passes 2 outlets. I do not notice any distortion or noise. Is there a limit to when you must use XLR? The SVS micro only has RCA.
  2. Similar question - if I were to get two subs I would have the second sub with a cable run of between 20 and 28 feet depending upon location. It would pass 3 outlets and run parallel to the first subs cable. Would this require an XLR cable?
  3. Does anyone know a smaller sub than can do XLR? Realistically I think the largest SVS I could do would be a 2000 and they don't start using XLR until the 4000 series. I went and looked at them this weekend and they are just too physically large for the place I would be able to put them and remain married. I looked at Rhythmic and it looks like you can get XLR connector on most of their subs but they are fairly substantially sized too. I also had kind of hard time following their website.
Here is my REW result at my first attempt at running Roomperfect DSP. I would like to get it better and get rid of the boominess which I suspect is the peak right about 110-120 hz.
1718336075267.png


Thanks for any help and advice!
 
I am attempting to integrate a sub (possibly) 2 using Lyngdorf's Roomperfect. I wanted to ask some questions about best practices in general with DSP. I currently have Kef R3 speakers and an SVS Micro 3000. I used Rew and moved my sub around potential locations until I got what I thought was the best REW chart for the sub alone. SVS recommended settings on their website state :

AV Receiver / Processor:​

Recommended Speaker/Subwoofer Crossover Frequency (Hz)80 Hz

Stereo Pre-Amplifier or Receiver:​

Recommended Low Pass Filter Frequency Setting (Hz)60 Hz
Recommended Low Pass Filter Slope (dB/octave)24 dB/octave

Questions for DSP are as follows:
  1. Are the SVS website settings for stereo pre-amp meant to be used in the SVS app so that the sub DSP is doing the low pass and slope? It reads to me like they are telling you to put those settings in your stereo pre-amp or receiver (assuming it has sub integration features).
  2. Would I use those settings and then use the sub's EQ feature to make as ideal test results as possible prior to running DSP? IE, use the 3 band EQ in SVS app to tame peaks and valleys associated with the sub first and then run the Lyngdorf DSP on top of that. I was worried that might result in the DSP trying to fight the EQ.
  3. I started with my sub at maximum volume and reduced volume until the REW chart showed valleys hitting house curve but nothing really below house curve. The result after DSP is that there is some boominess in men's voices when watching a show. My thinking was that I have heard it is always better to reduce peaks than try and fill valleys. I figured if I started with everything above the projected curve line the DSP could reduce peaks vs trying to fill valleys. Hopefully that makes sense. Here is the chart REW produced prior to my first attempt at DSP.

I am not sure why SVS would recommend 80Hz XO point for an AVR but a 60Hz XO point for a stereo preamp. My take on it is that you choose your XO point depending on how low your speakers go, and how high the subs go. You should look at main speaker distortion (usually very high at the lower limit of the woofers) and ask yourself if you want to remove those freqs and give it to the subwoofer.

If you have external DSP, I would disable the built-in DSP in the subwoofer. This is because all of them add additional latency, sometimes up to 30ms. This will mess up time alignment.

Point (3) is a bad idea because it will provoke filter ringing. If your sub is very high and your speakers are low, then the crossover will be asymmetrical and will not sum properly. Asymmetrical crossovers are more likely to ring. This may be the cause of your boomy sounding bass. If you have dips in your bass response, you should find a better position for your subwoofer, or consider deploying more subwoofers to even out the bass response.

  1. Kef port plugs or no plus to run the roomperfect? The kef manual states to use the the ring ports (not fully closed off) for my distance from the wall. It seems to me it would be smart to follow Kef's instructions but they are not written for people who use DSP. Perhaps this is a function where I start with Rew first to see which is a better result and then go that way.

If you are running subwoofers, you no longer need the ports on your main speakers for bass extension. Ports introduce problems of their own, e.g. an uncontrollable out-of-phase wave that is impossible to DSP. I would recommend plugging the port.

1. Right now my sub is hooked up using RCA with about a 12 foot distance using a sixteen feet cable. It passes 2 outlets. I do not notice any distortion or noise. Is there a limit to when you must use XLR? The SVS micro only has RCA.
2. Similar question - if I were to get two subs I would have the second sub with a cable run of between 20 and 28 feet depending upon location. It would pass 3 outlets and run parallel to the first subs cable. Would this require an XLR cable?
3. Does anyone know a smaller sub than can do XLR? Realistically I think the largest SVS I could do would be a 2000 and they don't start using XLR until the 4000 series. I went and looked at them this weekend and they are just too physically large for the place I would be able to put them and remain married. I looked at Rhythmic and it looks like you can get XLR connector on most of their subs but they are fairly substantially sized too. I also had kind of hard time following their website.

If is very unlikely that your RCA cable will pick up noise by going past two outlets. There is more potential for this to happen if RCA cables run parallel to power cables and not cross at right angles as in the case of a power outlet. Still, the potential for noise is not eliminated. If you worried about this, look at the Spectrogram or Waterfall and see if you have a "resonance" at 50Hz that does not drop in amplitude. If you see that, then you either have a ground loop or your cables are picking up noise.

I personally prefer XLR because I don't even want to worry about what the cables are doing. Like you, I am using long runs of cables (my subwoofer cables are 8m long ... that's about 26 feet). I know that if I owned RCA cables I would be taking measurements to see if my choice had any effect.
 
My general opinion (which addresses a few of your questions indirectly) is that crossing a sub fairly high (100hz+ is not too high IMO) because it gives you an opportunity to fill more nulls, which is not really possible to do otherwise. I personally find bass nulls almost as annoying as peaks (hate when the bass notes go in and out when they're not supposed to) so even though you lose (some) benefit of lower distortion from mains, a wide overlap in the mains and subs has its merit.

From that point of view, you would do whatever extends the response of the mains lowest and cross the sub reasonably high, and then hopefully you can knock everything down to flat without having deep nulls to worry about.

It looks like you're actually close to that in your current setup except for the peak at 120hz which can be mostly removed with 1-2 additional filters. I think you're right that's where the boominess is coming from and I think it should sound pretty good once you get rid of it.

Haven't used roomperfect before but I think you're on the right track, don't overthink it too much, start by getting rid of that 120hz peak and see how it sounds.
 
I am attempting to integrate a sub (possibly) 2 using Lyngdorf's Roomperfect.…
What is it running te RoomPerfect?
In my AVP I can ALSO use REQs, but I am not sure if your product also has PEQs available??

Here is my REW result at my first attempt at running Roomperfect DSP. I would like to get it better and get rid of the boominess which I suspect is the peak right about 110-120 hz.


Thanks for any help and advice!

I would chuck in a semi narrow PEQ at that ~120 HZ peak and give it some negative gain.
 
I am not sure why SVS would recommend 80Hz XO point for an AVR but a 60Hz XO point for a stereo preamp. My take on it is that you choose your XO point depending on how low your speakers go, and how high the subs go. You should look at main speaker distortion (usually very high at the lower limit of the woofers) and ask yourself if you want to remove those freqs and give it to the subwoofer.

If you have external DSP, I would disable the built-in DSP in the subwoofer. This is because all of them add additional latency, sometimes up to 30ms. This will mess up time alignment.

Point (3) is a bad idea because it will provoke filter ringing. If your sub is very high and your speakers are low, then the crossover will be asymmetrical and will not sum properly. Asymmetrical crossovers are more likely to ring. This may be the cause of your boomy sounding bass. If you have dips in your bass response, you should find a better position for your subwoofer, or consider deploying more subwoofers to even out the bass response.
For your second and third paragraph I think I confused things. I did not turn down crossover point - I turned down the volume of the sub using the sub's volume control (if that is what you mean). Do you think/know if volume would introduce latency as well? It is controlled through the same app as the subs DSP. I have no trouble running it at full volume and letting room perfect take care of it.

If you are running subwoofers, you no longer need the ports on your main speakers for bass extension. Ports introduce problems of their own, e.g. an uncontrollable out-of-phase wave that is impossible to DSP. I would recommend plugging the port.
If is very unlikely that your RCA cable will pick up noise by going past two outlets. There is more potential for this to happen if RCA cables run parallel to power cables and not cross at right angles as in the case of a power outlet. Still, the potential for noise is not eliminated. If you worried about this, look at the Spectrogram or Waterfall and see if you have a "resonance" at 50Hz that does not drop in amplitude. If you see that, then you either have a ground loop or your cables are picking up noise.

I personally prefer XLR because I don't even want to worry about what the cables are doing. Like you, I am using long runs of cables (my subwoofer cables are 8m long ... that's about 26 feet). I know that if I owned RCA cables I would be taking measurements to see if my choice had any effect.
Thanks. I will use the plugs and test/listen.

My general opinion (which addresses a few of your questions indirectly) is that crossing a sub fairly high (100hz+ is not too high IMO) because it gives you an opportunity to fill more nulls, which is not really possible to do otherwise. I personally find bass nulls almost as annoying as peaks (hate when the bass notes go in and out when they're not supposed to) so even though you lose (some) benefit of lower distortion from mains, a wide overlap in the mains and subs has its merit.

From that point of view, you would do whatever extends the response of the mains lowest and cross the sub reasonably high, and then hopefully you can knock everything down to flat without having deep nulls to worry about.

It looks like you're actually close to that in your current setup except for the peak at 120hz which can be mostly removed with 1-2 additional filters. I think you're right that's where the boominess is coming from and I think it should sound pretty good once you get rid of it.

Haven't used roomperfect before but I think you're on the right track, don't overthink it too much, start by getting rid of that 120hz peak and see how it sounds.
What is it running te RoomPerfect?
In my AVP I can ALSO use REQs, but I am not sure if your product also has PEQs available??



I would chuck in a semi narrow PEQ at that ~120 HZ peak and give it some negative gain.

I am running RoomPerfect using the Mcintosh MEN 220. I know their gear is not usually discussed on this site but I just love it. The first system that got me really into sound quality was a Mcintosh system in college. I have always wanted one since then. Now that I am at a point where I can make it happen I am doing it.

It definitely has the ability to add some custom adjustments to it. I have to hook up my computer and figure out how to add a custom curve. I probably won't get to it until later on Sunday (damn family reunions) but thanks for all of the advice.
 
For your second and third paragraph I think I confused things. I did not turn down crossover point - I turned down the volume of the sub using the sub's volume control (if that is what you mean). Do you think/know if volume would introduce latency as well? It is controlled through the same app as the subs DSP. I have no trouble running it at full volume and letting room perfect take care of it.

No, what I meant is that high volume in the sub matched with low volume in the main speakers would produce an asymmetric crossover. I will show you what I mean.

AD_4nXcxSHOn7K8M0VUhPuLM3qNaTU0jNmxXo5QQHkXNGRgGrWHrbVdnXoC7vXJSkYfhHcvAAn69RhrwmRbbwgdYilTVw-XLxtyMtE4_sL5iwVO6g3WTMwQ6_vc_h15CUbk7P9ncXeEAAB41hMUKJqBiwPB7JIL-


Here we start with a woofer LPF + midrange HPF. Take note of the crossover point which I have shaded, there is a dip followed by a peak. The difference is about 15dB.

AD_4nXe55MNtlBGf9LSYPOXrJhpscRmCwT8AArKUjPHN6We1FJeK8YLxPfqwkvjabR-DSfYIF8_DfAw-lX87fwTP5kdzHcpFHrXYXqktkyPhE50aukMJORQyUr2VQ1M5QC6QZiIsp7pKItbi1qjaHWVdnZAgm3A


Once the correction is convolved into the crossover, the crossover is no longer symmetric at the crossover band.

AD_4nXeCxyXQIziv9vDQBn5vIqR7ahnVU397pj7yQYlOP2vCVf4FxjaxDbAjHo8VfwVlyll8jXPFaQ_FG0OrCsAcDhA-K9Tz4FGrnPYMuNqNLvBwPW5Pl9w2HQFMBcNuQYzTWHZYndX9H-98aqstxpBeLB0Xox_i


The difference shows up as copious pre-ringing. If you are using minphase IIR filters, you will get a lot of post-ringing. Bottom line: make sure your sub and your woofer are level matched, especially in the crossover band. If you see a dip and a peak or some kind of notch in the band, move your speakers or your sub so that the dip/notch moves out of the XO range.

I don't know how the volume control in your sub is implemented. If it is implemented via DSP, then it looks as if there is no way to defeat the DSP in your sub and the latency will always be there.
 


I am running RoomPerfect using the Mcintosh MEN 220. I know their gear is not usually discussed on this site but I just love it. The first system that got me really into sound quality was a Mcintosh system in college. I have always wanted one since then. Now that I am at a point where I can make it happen I am doing it.

It definitely has the ability to add some custom adjustments to it. I have to hook up my computer and figure out how to add a custom curve. I probably won't get to it until later on Sunday (damn family reunions) but thanks for all of the advice.

From their site: https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/-/medi...revision=a6d867cc-824b-49ed-bc6e-ac6e60f2d832

Just chuck in the reverse look thing at that 120Hz, and see how that goes.
It looks looks like you gave a few options so you could A/B between them, which I guess is A/B, A/C, A/D etc… :)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1791.png
    IMG_1791.png
    1,022.4 KB · Views: 76
Back
Top Bottom