• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Benchmark AHB2 design

We have this thread. It is not too difficult to push the AHB-2 into clipping.
AHAH. that’s what I was talking about

Quoted From that thread:

“…., while getting my goosebumps I noticed some flickering lights from the AHB2, and of course they were the right/left clipping warning lights. I also heard the speakers seeming to be a bit distressed. I immediately lowered the volume of course but I did repeat the episode and clearly at -10 to -15 the amp was clipping.

The Revel's are fairly efficient (high 80s i believe) and in the Audioholics review Larson characterized them as "easy to drive". Especially given the support from the subs I really thought I would never see the amp clip. Based on this experience I clearly need to keep the volume reasonable and preserve my hearing but now I realize I'm closer to the max ouput of the amp than I thought.”
 
Okay, maybe I was reading too quickly, trying to catch up. But it sure seemed to me that our friend Pablolie was claiming only that all of the amps in the excellent category (at least) would be indistinguishable from one another (audibly, which is all that matters to such a claim) if operated in their linear envelope, and you were sounding like such a claim was a disparagement to Benchmark, which it was not. His claim was based on audibility, and yours was based on design and execution. I had already responded to a couple of those posts by the time you stipulated that it made no audible difference, though when I saw that I wondered why all the heat.

But now I'm adding heat and don't mean to. We are all friends here.

Rick "whose left ear noticeably distorts at probably 95 dB SPL, which seems to go along with the tinnitus, but still listens to loud music on occasion" Denney
Throughout my personal life, everytime a conversation starts to get lively or even gets a little "heated," my peace maker sister always comes in and tries to "calm" things down. I always have to explain to her that there is nothing to calm down about. It's a lively discussion, and lively discussions are great for the soul, it makes life exciting. I thoroughly enjoy it!!!

I don't see any issues with this lively discussion thus far, except someone called me a bot, which was not necessary.

Having said that, we talked a wide range of unrelated topics. I think the topics that are the most lively are (a) AHB2 is not class D, I along with many felt the urgent need to correct this misinformation. (b) I claimed that the AHB2 is a better amp than Hypex and Purifi.

I think (b) is the part that doesn't sit well with many people, their chief complaints are the power of the AHB2 and any performance gain is not audible therefore it's irrelevant. And I agreed about the audibility, but I disagreed about it not matter, and use a Ferrari as an anology. And now we are talking about power and if 100w is enough for most use cases.
 
Last edited:
We have this thread. It is not too difficult to push the AHB-2 into clipping.
Did you even read this entire thread?

"I know, don't start, it was ear damaging but the older you get the lesser the consequences seem."
 
Did you even read this entire thread?

"I know, don't start, it was ear damaging but the older you get the lesser the consequences seem."
I'd keep poor decision making in building a system outside the topic, and such mismatches should be easy to avoid. And I'd rather blow speakers to smithereens rather than my ears...
 
Anyway, I promise this is a normal lively discussion in my mind, that's how almost all discussions go in my family and we love it, except with my peace maker sister, who is shy of anything remotely controversial.

I want to reassure everyone here that you cannot tell any difference between a Hypex, Purifi and AHB2, level matched. I have both, the AHB2 and Hypex, there are no audible differences. In fact, with most competently designed amps, there is no difference.

But the AHB2 is just a better amplifier in all measures aside from the power output (but even that I can dispute as you can bridge the AHB2). In which unbridged, the power output of the AHB2 is sufficient for nearly all use cases if you value your hearing. Just like the SINAD of Hypex and Purifi is sufficient for nearly all use cases.

But like it or not, the Benchmark is just a better engineered amp, and there is the possibility that there unlikely will be another amp better than it even in the future. If you own the AHB2, you own a piece of audio history.
 
Anyway, I promise this is a normal lively discussion in my mind, that's how almost all discussions go in my family and we love it, except with my peace maker sister, who is shy of anything remotely controversial.

I want to reassure everyone here that you cannot tell any difference between a Hypex, Purifi and AHB2, level matched. I have both, the AHB2 and Hypex, there are no audible differences. In fact, with most competently designed amps, there is no difference.

But the AHB2 is just a better amplifier in all measures aside from the power output (but even that I can dispute as you can bridge the AHB2). In which unbridged, the power output of the AHB2 is sufficient for nearly all use cases if you value your hearing. Just like the SINAD of Hypex and Purifi is sufficient for nearly all use cases.

But like it or not, the Benchmark is just a better engineered amp, and there is the possibility that there unlikely will be another amp better than it even in the future. If you own the AHB2, you own a piece of audio history.
I gave it a like, but I repeat that all these top amp designs are phenomenally engineered and simply - as always in engineering - make different design choices and comprimises to achieve basically the same end results, and deliver those to be optimal for different use cases.
 
Did you even read this entire thread?

"I know, don't start, it was ear damaging but the older you get the lesser the consequences seem."
Outside the range of ~800 - 8 kHz, our ears can handle pretty high SPL for reasonable amounts of time with little problem. Much of the energy in music is in the low frequencies.

1759276263274.png
 
Outside the range of ~800 - 8 kHz, our ears can handle pretty high SPL for reasonable amounts of time with little problem. Much of the energy in music is in the low frequencies.

View attachment 479691
Again, the impact will be different based on the particular track, there are no simple rules here. Anyone that thinks regular high 90ish SPL peaks are fine should be a bit more careful IMO. I am super glad I have always been very sensitive to loudish noise and have always worn ear plugs when things get loud. Motorcycle riding, night clubs, concerts... I get very bad headaches from being in loud environments. Always have.
I seem to recall noise induced hearing damage is tested at 4kHz. That in no way means your hearing can not be damaged outside of that range. And carefully note that presence region is the most vital to our hearing.
 
Last edited:
Outside the range of ~800 - 8 kHz, our ears can handle pretty high SPL for reasonable amounts of time with little problem.
Define "pretty high SPL" and define "reasonable amount of time".

Much of the energy in music is in the low frequencies.
Source? Because a quick AI search states otherwise, but I'm not going to spend time to dig until you can validate this statement with a source.

Mostly importantly, I invite you to listen to 95dB of music for 15 mins.
 
...
Source? Because a quick AI search states otherwise, but I'm not going to spend time to dig until you can validate this statement with a source.

Mostly importantly, I invite you to listen to 95dB of music for 15 mins.

I think it is pretty established that the vast majority of musical energy is between 40Hz to 14kHz, and that anything outside it doesn't impact our listening enjoyment much. Also means that hearing too loudly (which starts at 85dB in the presence zone, I think) is a guarantee to degrade your hearing ability over a short-ish timeframe. I have never enjoyed high SPL levels, they impact my enjoyment of music. I attend concerts but often hate how loud they think they need to be (I carry good earplugs with me all the time, and sleep with them every night because a mouse's fart wakes me up).
And I loathe those "listen to my system" boast moments when it is about hammering up the volume level and yeah "FEEL" the music. I'd rather listen, thanks.

 
Last edited:
Again, the impact will be different based on the particular track, there are no simple rules here. Anyone that thinks regular high 90ish SPL peaks are fine should be a bit more careful IMO. I am super glad I have always been very sensitive to loudish noise and have always worn ear plugs when things get loud. Motorcycle riding, night clubs, concerts... I get very bad headaches from being in loud environments. Always have.
I seem to recall noise induced hearing damage is tested at 4kHz. That in no way means your hearing can not be damaged outside of that range. And carefully note that presence region is the most vital to our hearing.
Here is a screen shot of the NIOSH sound level meter app from the "Using the NIOSH Noise App" page at U of Washington School of Public Health. (Same screen shot is also in the PDF help guide of the NIOSH app.) I'll assume these numbers are representative of real life sounds.
noiseapp_screen.png


The average noise level, A-weighted, LAeq, is 100.3 dB. The max level* is 119.8 dB, and the LCpeak is 137.5 dB. In this case, LAeq of 100.3 dB for the run duration of 15 minutes 1 second is 103.8% of recommended allowable noise dosage for a work day. This level of noise dosage can also be considered equivalent to 85.2 dB (TWA, time weighted average) noise exposure for an 8 hour work day.

Notice that the LCpeak (highest peak value of the sound pressure waves, C-weighted) is 37 dB higher than LAeq, which is the average sound volume. I'll extrapolate this to postulate that the peak sound pressure level, which is what we want our audio system to reproduce accurately for high fidelity listening, can easily be >30 dB over the average listening level.

Note:
* Max level is the maximum reported levels for all the sampling periods during the measurement. For occupational health noise measurements, the noise levels are measured using A-weighted and "slow" response (time weighting constant = 1 s). Note that all measured noise levels are time weighted averages. The LCpeak is the true sound pressure peak.

See the MATLAB splMeter documentation page for details of the math.
https://www.mathworks.com/help/audio/ref/splmeter-system-object.html
 
Here is a screen shot of the NIOSH sound level meter app from the "Using the NIOSH Noise App" page at U of Washington School of Public Health. (Same screen shot is also in the PDF help guide of the NIOSH app.) I'll assume these numbers are representative of real life sounds.
noiseapp_screen.png


The average noise level, A-weighted, LAeq, is 100.3 dB. The max level* is 119.8 dB, and the LCpeak is 137.5 dB. In this case, LAeq of 100.3 dB for the run duration of 15 minutes 1 second is 103.8% of recommended allowable noise dosage for a work day. This level of noise dosage can also be considered equivalent to 85.2 dB (TWA, time weighted average) noise exposure for an 8 hour work day.

Notice that the LCpeak (highest peak value of the sound pressure waves, C-weighted) is 37 dB higher than LAeq, which is the average sound volume. I'll extrapolate this to postulate that the peak sound pressure level, which is what we want our audio system to reproduce accurately for high fidelity listening, can easily be >30 dB over the average listening level.

Note:
* Max level is the maximum reported levels for all the sampling periods during the measurement. For occupational health noise measurements, the noise levels are measured using A-weighted and "slow" response (time weighting constant = 1 s). Note that all measured noise levels are time weighted averages. The LCpeak is the true sound pressure peak.

See the MATLAB splMeter documentation page for details of the math.
https://www.mathworks.com/help/audio/ref/splmeter-system-object.html
Not sure how in any way this is a rebuttal on what I stated. If you are clueless on the DR of whatever track you are listening to, that's on you. Zero to do with gear quality, all to do with poor system matching choices. Was my point since the Cambrian inception of this post.
 
Not sure how in any way this is a rebuttal on what I stated.
I was not refuting what you said. I am just showing 80 dB average, not high 90ish, can easily give in 110 dB peaks (for uncompressed live sound, at least).
 
I was not refuting what you said. I am just showing 80 dB average, not high 90ish, can easily give in 110 dB peaks (for uncompressed live sound, at least).
But yet again - anyone that's unaware of DR and listening SPL limits... that's on them, and it is in no way a legitimate gear test, at least not in my opinion. It's not your gears' fault if you decide to obliterate your hearing ability. Just like i got tired news to hear about people suing tobacco companies when it was established for 30 years there was a correlation with lung cancer. The info had been out for eons. Those who choose to ignore the obvious are either stupid or opportunists. Can you imagine a class action lawsuit against companies that enabled perfect linear audio delivery at over 95dB SPL because people blame them for hearing loss?
 
But yet again - anyone that's unaware of DR and listening SPL limits... that's on them, and it is in no way a legitimate gear test, at least not in my opinion. It's not your gears' fault if you decide to obliterate your hearing ability. Just like i got tired news to hear about people suing tobacco companies when it was established for 30 years there was a correlation with lung cancer. The info had been out for eons. Those who choose to ignore the obvious are either stupid or opportunists. Can you imagine a class action lawsuit against companies that enabled perfect linear audio delivery at over 95dB SPL because people blame them for hearing loss?
Yup.

Anyway, I'm 47, I'm happy with my hearing as it is now and the SPL I listen too is more than sufficient for my hearing. If others want to experiment with how much SPL their ears can handle, go for it. Who am I to tell them otherwise.
 
...
Yup.

Anyway, I'm 47, I'm happy with my hearing as it is now and the SPL I listen too is more than sufficient for my hearing. If others want to experiment with how much SPL their ears can handle, go for it. Who am I to tell them otherwise.

I never claim super hearing, just go by what works for me combined with basic tests that confirm gear is competently designed.
 
...


I never claim super hearing, just go by what works for me combined with basic tests that confirm gear is competently designed.
I didn't comment much for months because I have taken up multiple other brain activities but I am logged into ASR all day everyday and read the comments all through the day as part of my usual routine. So I am here and just not commenting much. I read all of your comments because you have a different angle on pretty much everything imaginable. They are interesting and give me pause and reflection compared to the usual stuff. Some of your software insider information and ideas about the state of the industry and future orientation have been pretty interesting.
 
AHAH. that’s what I was talking about

Quoted From that thread:

“…., while getting my goosebumps I noticed some flickering lights from the AHB2, and of course they were the right/left clipping warning lights. I also heard the speakers seeming to be a bit distressed. I immediately lowered the volume of course but I did repeat the episode and clearly at -10 to -15 the amp was clipping.

The Revel's are fairly efficient (high 80s i believe) and in the Audioholics review Larson characterized them as "easy to drive". Especially given the support from the subs I really thought I would never see the amp clip. Based on this experience I clearly need to keep the volume reasonable and preserve my hearing but now I realize I'm closer to the max ouput of the amp than I thought.”
Generally, I think this is true for most listeners more often than they realize, if they listen to truly dynamic recordings (which most are not). The assumption of "operating within their envelope" is less often a reliable assumption than we realize, if the use case is playing music really loudly (dangerously loud for typical compressed content when the average loudness is high relative to the peaks).

I started out listening to 86-dB Advents using a 45-watt Kenwood integrated amp. It's an excellent little amp, and reasonably efficient speakers at a meter or so can be made very loud with it. But less-efficient speakers at 2 or more meters, maybe not so much for spirited listening to content with dynamic peaks. I upgraded to a Spectro Acoustics 202, which was transformational in that it could play effortlessly loud with those Advents in my smaller rooms. When it went up in smoke for the second time, I replaced it with a Carver commercial amp that lacked guts, and may simply have been assuming commercial-level inputs (+10 dBU balanced inputs instead of -4 dBU single-ended inputs), though my Onkyo preamp at the time could certainly crank out some voltage. (Guts = ability to play peak content loudly without distortion or compression). I switched to a cheapie Samson commercial amp that supplied guts and maybe not much else. It was otherwise fairly crappy, but the ability to drive peak listening levels made a bigger difference in my listening experience than did particularly low distortion. More recently, that amp also failed and I bought a much-better B&K Reference 125.2, 125 watts into 8 ohms with plenty of headroom. It drove the Advents pretty well, but I still ended up stacking Advents and running the other pair with an identical B&K amp--the equivalent of 250 watts/channel into 86-dB speakers. That fulfilled my use case admirably, but failed in many other objectives, with horrendous comb filtering that would change the sound very noticeably if I blinked or took a breath and nothing resembling real imaging (because of where two pairs of Advents had to be placed in that peculiar room). I switched to the Revel F12's with the amps separately driving the woofers and higher drivers (an illusion that added no power benefit, of course) and the additional efficiency of those speakers made a difference. But the B&K amps ran hot and I didn't have a place for them that made cooling easy, plus it was time to try something new, and that's when I bought the Buckeye amp.

But even at an honest and very clean 330 watts/channel into the (nominally) 6 ohms of the Revel towers, the amp will show the clipping indicators when playing dynamically recorded percussion music at high loudness (the drum solo on the Chesky demonstration CD is my test piece for checking this--it's easily the most dynamically recorded percussion I've ever heard). But only the most dynamically recorded music can tolerate the level required to flash those LEDs--most recorded music would drive even me out of the house if the peaks were that loud, not to mention hearing damage. When I play an only mildly processed recording, such as, say, Rick Wakeman's Red Planet, I can't make those lights flash at any tolerable listening level. True also listening to, say, Bruckner's 8th Symphony played loudly enough for me to blast along with the brass section on my tuba--I don't see the clipping indicators for that, either. I am playing that music significantly louder than any audience member would hear it.

So, I'm not prepared to disagree with the notion that the AHB2 isn't as powerful as would be needed for some content to be played at reference level in relatively inefficient speakers. (Though two of them as bridged monoblocks certainly would in any residential setting for mortals that I can think of.) But I do think it's easy to overstate how loud that needs to be, especially for normally recorded acoustic music.

Rick "whose Revel F12's play 91-dB at 1W/1M" Denney
 
I'm puzzled by the suggestion that the AHB2 could damage speakers in a scenario in which it doesn't provide enough power. My understanding was that it has some of the most sophisticated speaker protection circuitry available in any amplifier. Or are there situations in which this would still not be sufficient to protect the speakers?
 
I'm puzzled by the suggestion that the AHB2 could damage speakers in a scenario in which it doesn't provide enough power. My understanding was that it has some of the most sophisticated speaker protection circuitry available in any amplifier. Or are there situations in which this would still not be sufficient to protect the speakers?
You are 100% correct. Not a lot of people know, but the AHB2 has a myriad of protection mechanisms - hence another reason why it is the best amp of all time.

From the AHB2 manual.
1759326136105.png


Though, I gather others here are talking about other amps that's being pushed to clipping. However, merely being underpower without pushing your amp to clipping will NOT damage any speakers.
 
Back
Top Bottom