BlackTalon
Senior Member
and send one to Amir for testing.It's only $1800. Buy a couple and see!
and send one to Amir for testing.It's only $1800. Buy a couple and see!
If it didn't even keep good time, that would simply be an audiophile feature. I mean sometimes you can't measure time with instruments.and send one to Amir for testing.
All done simply to latch on to the audiophool's love of spending large amounts of money on useless shit.The problem is that the cable’s electrical performance does not affect sound measurements one iota. So, a ton of engineering and manufacturing expertise has gone into making the cable, resulting in enhanced electrical performance, but resulting in no differences in audio performance.
Any chance that the price being charged on the back of false assertions and the fact that they have not withdrawn the product in the face of the truth might undermine your argument?I am pretty sure Belden didn't want to be associated with this product. But has agreed to build them the cable like they would for any other customer (although letting him use their name). The designer behind this product owns a bunch of PS Audio gear and fell for the wrong impression that cables make a difference. And fell right into confirmation bias that way with his own cables. So much so that they were confident that my testing would prove the same. All good intensions. But misguided.
I disagree. I think the designer is selling a story for the bux. He saw an opportunity and decided why not get a few bucks while making people think they got a deal for something better.I am pretty sure Belden didn't want to be associated with this product. But has agreed to build them the cable like they would for any other customer (although letting him use their name). The designer behind this product owns a bunch of PS Audio gear and fell for the wrong impression that cables make a difference. And fell right into confirmation bias that way with his own cables. So much so that they were confident that my testing would prove the same. All good intensions. But misguided.
The designer is a retired former senior engineer at Belden. I think that he knew the right people to talk to at Belden and they in turn humored his project.I am pretty sure Belden didn't want to be associated with this product. But has agreed to build them the cable like they would for any other customer (although letting him use their name). The designer behind this product owns a bunch of PS Audio gear and fell for the wrong impression that cables make a difference. And fell right into confirmation bias that way with his own cables. So much so that they were confident that my testing would prove the same. All good intensions. But misguided.
I have used Belden, Canare, Mogami, Percon, Sommer and more - cables.Still, you might want something built a little bit more heavily. In that case, any professional broadcast or microphone cable—Belden, Canare, Mogami, Klotz, Gotham, Van Damme, Van den Hul, etc.—should do the trick. For connectors, Canare, Switchcraft, Amphenol, Mogami, Neutrik, etc., should work fine.
I'm still trying to figure out the significance of this.You can look up the Iconoclast patent - https://ppubs.uspto.gov/pubwebapp/static/pages/ppubsbasic.html
using the patent numbers 9748022 & 9293239 shown on post #648.
The post or the patents? If the patents, I agree.I'm still trying to figure out the significance of this.
Some people are convinced of the authenticity of innovation if a patent is granted or even pending.The post or the patents? If the patents, I agree.
Yeah, I cannot see why they received these patents. The 1st one is just how to spiral a balanced cable with mostly air around the conductors which other people have already done in the past. The 2nd is about how this method reduces propagation delay and inductance at audio frequencies. Again don't see a patent in that.I'm still trying to figure out the significance of this.
The post or the patents? If the patents, I agree.
Yes, the patents. Examiners are... ummm... not always concerned with accuracy and whether something actually does anything (they have a huge pile of applications to wade through), it's more a matter of getting the claims wording to something they like. Reading the file wrappers is often instructive in cases where you wonder what the hell the examiner was thinking.Some people are convinced of the authenticity of innovation if a patent is granted or even pending.