Are you saying that 20hz-60hz can be localized?
No. BUT the second order harmonic distortion of that 60 Hz signal can be localized.
Simple test. Take a subwoofer at modest level, stand close somewhat close to the sub just play a movie with real LFE content, muting all channels but the sub. Pick a scene with a lot of active content. While standing still, turn around and see if there is a difference when facing the front or rear wall. Real LFE content is nice stress test to include IMD but the effect works with test tones too.
Now increase the volume and step further away from the sub. You are roughly level matches. Now do the same test.
When you start to hit the distortion limits of the subwoofer, you will add localization. It is my opinion that the sound quality doesn’t change too much between low and high distortion bass, which is consistent with the CTA-2010 arguments that you can have 10 or 20% THD without it being offensive when it comes to bass. However, it is also my opinion that there is a difference in localization with higher distortion…. Which is not a “sound audibility” perspective but an immersion perspective.
The other practical way is to try two different subwoofers. I have an approximately 1500 cubic ft room where I am 3m from the main subs. I use an 18” PSA S1813M and 15” Earthquake Supernova Luminous. These subs are seemingly overkill, but it allows the subs to work at a much lower level of distortion and increases immersion by reducing localization.
I also have an Earthquake Sound CP-8 slim sub. That has a lot of output and a lot of distortion. It’s a good choice when you have to choose between zero subwoofer and a budget subwoofer that’s small, but there’s clearly a difference. I ironically have my smallest sub in my biggest room (for aesthetics).
Last, the LFE channel itself is mixed to 120 Hz.