Not that it will make any difference to explain this here, but what you write is exactly how speakers for music production can not be judged.
It is done by listening at least a few hours to reference material on them and do some work.
Then you start to hear, if the speakers are helpful in hearing details.
- For me Auratones are exceptionally good in showing if the levels of the instruments are even correct.
- They also work much better for me than any other speaker to get the midrange right, because they immediately show, if something is too thin, or muddy.
- Besides great tonal helpfulness, their transient behaviour is amazing.
- You also hear the finest details in kicks-, basses- and sequencer-attacks, where (at least to me) it is impossible to hear on full range speakers. The dynamic interaction between the kick and the bassline and sequencers int he upper bass range is so good. Especially in gernes, where the low end needs to be stuffed/filled to the maximum.
- Where the Auratones are probably the best speakers ever, is when it comes to delays, reverbs, ambiences and stereoizing of tracks, especially hooksounds or fat pads.
- Judging dynamics and setting the compressor is also where they are good/helpful at.
It is another story, if someone, who has worked on them, comes to the conclusiuon he does not like them, like the funny video where Warren Huart talked about his NS-10 induced paranoia. But the way how everybody in hifi forums is talking and "judging" speakers, is just ridiculous and really stupid and this forum is obviously also not helpful at all to educate people about speakers.
If you want to know, if a studio speaker is helpful, you need to work on it for some time and then check, if it helped to reveal all important details and how the things that got worked on, are translating.