FixedRelax bro. You will not make CABLE believers out of a bunch of EEs PERIOD
FixedRelax bro. You will not make CABLE believers out of a bunch of EEs PERIOD
No worries! It's quite eye-opening to read what engineers think of themselves and their discipline.
I worked as an engineer for just over a year for a company that had agreed to sponsor me. Probably a bit too macho, and a bit too dangerous (mostly on North Sea oil platforms). I studied something safer. So I have a little engineering insight from personal experience.
Anyone who thinks their scientific field is a done deal, even if only what a cable does, lacks scientific enquiry.
Do you really think you can make a cable-sound nonbeliever out of an Ayuverdist?What makes you certain that the things you hear in power cables are not caused by the placebo effect?
That's just a marketing line some companies use to sell you stuff. Lay people put value on anything from aerospace industry thinking it is more advanced as far as performance without any understanding of it. It is the same as infomercials for knifes bragging about surgical steel.I’m not surprised how often power and cable technology flows from the aerospace industry into hifi.
Take, for example, a pump, a turbine, a jet engine and an oil rig. Mechanically, you can test them individually and they are fine. Stick them together as a system, then four sets of them side by side and they may behave rather differently. I used to have to stick on transducers and take readings on tape as these things were taken to full power and down again. Other people would be monitoring other things. We then did a lot of data analysis. It was a nasty, hot and dangerous job and very well paid.You worked as an an engineer?
Or ARE an engineer based on education and credentialing?
I agree there is a lot of b/s marketing, but there has been a transfer of key technology, in particular power supplies. These have made Class D viable and transformed consumer audio.That's just a marketing line some companies use to sell you stuff. Lay people put value on anything from aerospace industry thinking it is more advanced as far as performance without any understanding of it. It is the same as infomercials for knifes bragging about surgical steel.
You mean evidence based medicine? Science doesn't have borders.
Nobody practices "western" medicine any longer because it didn't work either.
So if I had worked for aerospace indu you would automatically think more highly of my statements?I agree there is a lot of b/s marketing, but there has been a transfer of key technology, in particular power supplies. These have made Class D viable and transformed consumer audio.
This is to be expected, because of the billions invested in aerospace. Audio is a microscopic industry by comparison. John Franks, who founded Chord, was a technical director of companies including Raytheon, a major defence contractor. Chord and dCS both first became successful in commercial recording and broadcasting. Only then did they make consumer products.
If so, I’ll mention that I was a Senior Scientist at Lockheed. And this is bullshit aimed at the totally technically ignorant.So if I had worked for aerospace indu you would automatically think more highly of my statements?
I'm not sure what you see as the script for such engagement. Amir has measured the effects of these wires, and those effects are nonexistent. What is there to discuss?what would interest me would be engagement between Amir a manufacturer or two because he thinks he’s right and they obviously don’t.
Such a shame you didn't found "Best cables on the planet"... you would be rich by now...I was a Senior Scientist at Lockheed
We were mainly testing for resonances between the system components, which to me seems pretty similar to a system of audio components connected in parallel and throwing out different kinds of electrical noise and energy affecting other components' performance.
This is what I suggested ASR should do - engage with designers of certain products and try and get a deeper understanding of whatever science it is that seems to make customers happy.
No, it is not.Take, for example, a pump, a turbine, a jet engine and an oil rig. Mechanically, you can test them individually and they are fine. Stick them together as a system, then four sets of them side by side and they may behave rather differently. I used to have to stick on transducers and take readings on tape as these things were taken to full power and down again. Other people would be monitoring other things. We then did a lot of data analysis. It was a nasty, hot and dangerous job and very well paid.
We did other things, I learned some programming, but one thing I appreciated is that engineering is about systems, and the same goes for audio systems. I've always preferred integrated systems, and power is a system as well, so testing a cable in isolation seems a pretty pointless exercise to me. We were mainly testing for resonances between the system components, which to me seems pretty similar to a system of audio components connected in parallel and throwing out different kinds of electrical noise and energy affecting other components' performance.
Sometimes these systems fail. We worked on one that killed 130 people. The system failed, the component that broke was not in itself badly designed. At least in audio systems the worst you will get is an annoying buzz or a blown fuse.
Ha! Your comment made my day. This is just so stupid. (Although that Audioquest cable wouldn't be welcome to a hospital in Europe without a CE certification.)But surely, you’re not using the freebie POS power cords that came with your diagnostic equipment?!
If they make claims, they can give the proof. No need to “engage”.So ASR can continue shouting from the sidelines that his scientific machine says this cable, and all cables, are fakery. Or, as above, ASR could engage with cable manufacturers and try and understand what they are about.
If they make claims, they can give the proof. No need to “engage”.