Hello
@amirm, old friend.

As one of the potential fools who (somewhat) happily exchanged lots of cash for supposed snake oil of the Niagara variety (twice, even), I thought I'd chime in.
I participated in a loaner + review program for the Niagara 1000 and later the 1200, organized by
Todd the Vinyl Junkie. My reviews are on Head-Fi:
Niagara 1000 review,
Niagara 1200 review. I wound up buying the Niagara 1000 some months after my review and later upgrading to the Niagara 1200 (to get a second high current outlet).
Long story short is that the Niagara 1000 made no clear difference in my headphone rigs at work or at home, and a profound difference in my speaker system at home.
Due to time constraints at the time of the review I have not tried a one by one test to see which component seemed to benefit how much from it, but maybe that system would be a helpful starting point. I used a Topping DX7s as the DAC and preamp at the time, and a Schiit Vidar as the power amp, as well as a Rythmik F12G subwoofer. My source was a Surface Pro 4 on battery power. Speakers were the ELAC BS 403, which are not very efficient.
Of course it's impossible to know, and therefore reproduce, whatever issues my AC power my have, so whatever "conditioning" was apparently effective here may not be needed somewhere else, even with the same components. Some people report hearing radio stations or the neighbor's wireless phone through their system!
Both models have two separate banks of low current outlets - you mentioned how noise in one outlet might affect another, which it well might, but maybe you can test whether that is less the case across those banks. It's weird that the banks are mentioned in the manual, but not marked on the power conditioners. From my second review, hopefully accurate:
The five non-high current outlets on both units are divided into two banks, the two outlets next to the high current outlet(s), and the outer three.
If you have some PowerLAN adapters flying around, those are essentially AC noise generators by design and might be helpful test tools. You'd think a good power conditioner would seriously mess up their ability to function, at least reducing throughout.
As far as the differences between the low and high voltage outlets are concerned:
One of my tests in the original review was with a dimmable torchiere that was very talented at making a Tripp-Lite Isobar buzz like mad. It induced a light buzz in the low current outlets of the Niagara 1000 and none in the high current outlets, for what it's worth.
Another funny test was getting my vacuum almost stuck while the torchiere (with an LED light bulb) is dimmed a bit, making it flicker a lot. I suspect that indicates voltage fluctuations.
Audioquest Niagara 1000: With either the torchiere or the vacuum plugged into the high current outlet and the other device plugged into one of its regular outlets: no flicker. With both devices plugged into its regular outlets: a lot of flicker with the dimmer at 90% & the vacuum almost getting stuck.
The Audioquest Thunder power cord was also provided and a giant pain to deal with, and I couldn't hear a difference with it anywhere. For what it's worth, Audioquest's reason for its alleged need here isn't the thickness, but that it uses the same directional wiring as inside the Niagara. My attempt to summarize the thinking there is that when you extrude copper, you'll get impurities on the outside that are oriented in one direction of the wire due to the extrusion process happening in one direction, and that radio frequencies are so small that these small impurities are very susceptible to them, and so you want to orient the wire such that the induced noise gets drained away. Garth claims to personally listen to all used wire to determine its orientation, for instance in the
Upscale Audio video about the Niagara 3000.
I don't have the furthest clue how that is supposed to work with the bi-directional nature of AC current, but hey, that's the claim.
He also says that using a Niagara power conditioner on a 15A circuit has similar benefits to using a 20A circuit in terms of instantaneous current availability. From the video transcript at about 5 minutes in:
What we've done with transient power correction is up to 25 milliseconds I have a circuit that can actually give that power supply of the power amplifier the current it needs [...] on demand.
My suspicion is that most of the benefits I heard stem from that capability rather than any noise having gotten cleaned up. That would also explain why you don't get a benefit with a low current DAC - just a thought.
Amir, have you ever tested one of those noise meters, as used in the Upscale Audio video? Could be fun as well to see what they pick up.
That's it for now. Are you not entertained?