I'm using this configuration (bypass, A90 medium gain) and IMHO is the best.Hi, I need some help.
I use a Topping A90 as a preamp connected via XLR to the Audiophonics HPAS400ET.
I use the “M” gain setting on the Topping (+6dB).
I'm using this configuration (bypass, A90 medium gain) and IMHO is the best.Hi, I need some help.
I use a Topping A90 as a preamp connected via XLR to the Audiophonics HPAS400ET.
I use the “M” gain setting on the Topping (+6dB).
Interesting. Based on Amir's review, Pre90 SINAD stays high up over 8V but is there something in the FR etc. that may have been missed into a punishing load? Stereophile tested the Pre90 as well but it seems mostly into 100k ohms.You need a powerful preamplifier to drive the high load of 4.4 kΩ, with an output impedance as low as possible to drive it with enough current and capable of 9V. For this I would choose a preamp with dedicated substantial transformers.
Topping Pre90 and D90 preamps might be a toy for this load. They have low output impedance and high voltage output level at high gain, but how can it pull oscillating current at low voltages, that's to say normal volumes?
I never liked Topping Pre90 or D90 because they both hide in specs that they have a high input impedance of 2 kΩ in XLR. What do you do if you have a ladder dac like a Denafrips Ares of 1.2 kΩ output impedance? It can't drive the Pre90, so the problems start there.
Everybody seems to use these Topping preamps with the Purifi. If you want to bypass the input buffer opamps, which are no substitute for a proper preamplifier by the way, choose a powerful one. Not just low output impedance or high brute voltage, but 'cojones' from the transformer to pull from the load at low voltages. The input buffer from the Audiophonics using opamps and big value resistors is the easy way to bring up the impedance, but this is rather a compromise (noise from the resistors and the opamps changing the sound).
This is my two cents.
Check measurements of the new AsciLab speakers, to be released soon...I don’t hate you because my B&W are yet on eBay and my next purchase is Revel M16
Amir tested the Audiophonics both with bypass and with the buffer, result is that sinad is quite the same (maybe you loose 1db). The opamps that audiophonics uses are more than good, if i'm not wrong they are the ones suggested by Putzeys himself. I think there is no evidence anything goes wrong if you connect directly the topping dac to the audiophonics.The input buffer from the Audiophonics using opamps and big value resistors is the easy way to bring up the impedance, but this is rather a compromise (noise from the resistors and the opamps changing the sound).
Or is it just an illusion? A microphone can give us the answerSo then why all these people complain that bass is lacking with bypass and Pre90/D90?
There is more than meets the eye.
Or is it just an illusion? A microphone can give us the answer
I think that there is really very little difference in the HPA-S400ET performance whether buffered or in bypass.Or is it just an illusion? A microphone can give us the answer
It has the same PSU as the two channel version (the1200W rated Hypex SMPS1200A400). Audiophonics no doubt will have designed a very good cicuit as buffer board that makes it drive the 3 Purifi modules flawlessly. You will most likely not get the absolute most out of the Purifi modules regarding maximum continous power output. Simply PSU limited: the claimed3x400W equals the 1200W PSU output (though 1500W peak). Nothing in electronics is 100% efficient...I am looking for a 3 channel Amp and found a very similar product to the one tested in this review.
Would you say it is comparable to the 2 channel version of this review?
Any comments or things to consider?
Thanks =)
AUDIOPHONICS HPA-T400ET Power Amplifier Class D 3 Channels Purifi 1ET400A 3x400W 4 Ohm - Audiophonics
We are proud to offer you the AUDIOPHONICS HPA-T400ET, a 3 way class D power amplifier based on three PURIFI 1ET400A modules. This ready-to-use version is aimed at audiophiles who want to equip themselves with a foolproof amplification solution.www.audiophonics.frAudiophonics HPA-T400ET Power Amplifier Class D 3 Channels Purifi 1ET400A 3x400W 4 Ohm
Nord Acoustics makes models using Hypex, Icepower or Purifi modules. They allow you to spec out your amp to a certain degree, and at extra cost. Dual power supplies for your 2 channel amp? No problem, 120£ extra.How do this Audiophonics amps compare to the ones from Nord Acoustics? Looks like they use similar components. Living in Europe I could buy any of them. Still researching and reading =)
Thanks.
The triple power supply is the best solution. That way it's basically three monoblocks in one chassis. I wouldn't worry about EMI noise with multiple SMPS's and class D modules in relative close proximity. The Nord buffer boards I expect to be very comparable to the Audiophonics ones, but I don't know what the gain setting possibilities are on the Nord boards.Thanks Bob.
Just configurated a Nord Three Purifi 1ET400A and did not see those extra fees for shipping to EU Mainland at he checkout.
A roughly comparable amp from Nord vs. Audiophonics costs roughly +250€ but has following features different to the Audiophonics:
• 3 x Hypex SMPS1200A400 Power Supply
• 3 x Nord Buffer Board with OPA1612 Daul Op Amp
Dont know if that differences will be audible to my amateur ears =)
Do you coincidentally know why Nord doesn't make Nilai based products?Nord Acoustics makes models using Hypex, Icepower or Purifi modules. They allow you to spec out your amp to a certain degree, and at extra cost. Dual power supplies for your 2 channel amp? No problem, 120£ extra.
Do you know other companies that use them? Only found DIY solutions.Do you coincidentally know why Nord doesn't make Nilai based products?