• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Audiophonics HPA-S400ET Review (Stereo Amplifier)

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 1 0.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 5 1.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 40 7.9%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 458 90.9%

  • Total voters
    504
I wonder why the Audiophonics amplifier did not mount one of the two modules on the other side, making some use of the unused heatsink. The two heatsinks could then both be made smaller and both would then be gainfully employed. The supply module could sit in the middle, between the two amplifier ones.
If you really want symmetry, you can get 2 mono blocks for the same price.

But as @Bob101 said, the power supply is what generates the most heat (not much...)
 
What do you think of using a linear power supply to feed the input buffer board instead of using the SMPS1200A400 15.6Vdr aux?
Apollon audio does this to their premium Purifi and NCore amplifiers like this:
lps+buffer.jpg

It makes sense because a LPS is more suited to power the sensitive line-signal to the opamps, instead of a SMPS, as many dacs do.
It uses an encapsulated toroidal transformer from the mains and a circuit board with regulators, just as the Audiophonics input buffer does.

There is some space available inside the box by the middle, I wonder if you could fit one of their all-in-one LPS boards like these:


You only need to adjust +-15.6 Vdr to the LPS output to match the SMPS1200A400 Vaux ribbon connector, enough for 500mA.

I mean, Apollon audio sells 4.5k€ for their dual mono 1ET7040SA Purifi amp with this LPS for line-stage and two Hypex SMPS1200A400 for the Purifi modules.
 
Last edited:
Hi !

Do you have pops when switching on and off ? And if so, do you have any solutions ?
My speakers are on high output, so the noise is quite noticeable (but not very loud either).
 
In other way ... Why Hypex since the beginning recommends a switching power supply?
Because the input buffer/preamp circuit power supply quality is more important/sensitive to noise than that of the power module itself.

As a proof and for the same reason, Neurochrome offers a preamp power supply for both Purifi and Hypex input buffers:


Ideally I guess it would be optimal to feed the power modules with a toroidal transformer based linear power supply, but these are large and bulky and defeat the class D SMPS minimal space and efficiency approach. I have seen setups like this in diyaudio.com.

I only respond to your question and show an approach. Feel free to disregard.
 
Last edited:
Feel free to disregard.

i don't have the knowledge to agree / disagree ... but surely the SOTA results on hypex / purifi modules with switching power supplies tells me that toroidal transformers aren't a critical requirement in this kind of amplifier.
 
Still have some serious pop on start / shutdown of my HPA ... even without sources on XLR / RCA ..

 
Do you start/shut down your streamer or your power amp? For me this looks like a problem with your audio source..
In this video, i shut off and power on my source (Atoll ST300, 3k€) with trigger use.
But it does the same without source (no RCA, no XLR connected).
 
Do the HPA-S400ET have any type of protection circuit? The NAD M23 do have one but of course it cost a lot more.
 
SMPS as well as Purify Amp modules do have their security protection in their own, as far as I'm informed.
What's Your request in detail?
 
SMPS as well as Purify Amp modules do have their security protection in their own, as far as I'm informed.
What's Your request in detail?
I'm not sure what type of protection circuit is common but my Classé CA-2100 have some protection circuits that have saved my speakers on a couple of occations. Amp goes into protection mode. I also know that many brands have these kind of circuits to protect your gear. Not sure what exactly they do though. But for instance to protect your speaker drivers from blowing if something goes wrong electrically. If there is some anomaly in the signal. But I don't really know how they work more than that they exist and have saved my speakers.
 

As mentioned by @Salt, you can see protection mentioned on the module spec page linked above and if you look at the pictures on the Audiophonics site, it looks like they pop in the same module and connect the SMPS via their own buffer board. I see no reason the 1ET400 module's protection would be bypassed.

If you are still concerned, maybe email or PM them?
 

As mentioned by @Salt, you can see protection mentioned on the module spec page linked above and if you look at the pictures on the Audiophonics site, it looks like they pop in the same module and connect the SMPS via their own buffer board. I see no reason the 1ET400 module's protection would be bypassed.

If you are still concerned, maybe email or PM them?
Good idea!

NAD M23 have a protection mode. I don't know if they have designied their own or use Purifis built in. I will email Purifi and Audiophonics.
 

As mentioned by @Salt, you can see protection mentioned on the module spec page linked above and if you look at the pictures on the Audiophonics site, it looks like they pop in the same module and connect the SMPS via their own buffer board. I see no reason the 1ET400 module's protection would be bypassed.

If you are still concerned, maybe email or PM them?
I looked at the data sheet in the link you provided. The Purifi module seem to have quite extensive built in protection already matching the protection my Classé provides according to the manual. All good! Thanks for the help. :) I think I will sell my Classé and buy this instead.
 
Back
Top Bottom