• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Audio Smile LBM Monitor Review

Rate this powered monitor:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 14 6.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 98 45.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 104 47.9%

  • Total voters
    217
Has it been stated somewhere but are the midbass drivers used in these monitors Dayton Audio ND91-4? At least in the photo on spinorama.org they look very similar.

View attachment 503056View attachment 503057

I have used the bigger brother, ND140-4 in a diy 2.5 way build and it can deliver huge amount of bass and has incredible xmech.
It is, the DIY guide shows the Dayton driver boxes
 
View attachment 485428
Sorry, can't help but laugh at this end section of the whitepaper. If you squint your eyes, you might just know who the competitors are ;)
The paper itself is detailed and highlights the good engineering that went into these speakers. I especially like the use of steel beams as internal braces.
This article by Robert White and Rod Elliot illustrates why steel beats wood for bracing: lightweight, doesn't take up as much space, yet it's far stiffer, which is crucial in controlling panel resonances.
EDIT: I thought about the tweeter. Such a low Fs (275Hz) and high excursion is difficult to achieve from conventional tweeters. I believe a miniature full-range driver, reminiscent of those Harmon Kardon used in their 2.1 systems, was used here (they even look similar).
View attachment 485431
I genuinely love when papers do the bare minimum to censor the identity of competitor’s products. Feels like the author is giving me a wink lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom