"People that are bothered by bit depths higher than 1 are just dogmatic: they cannot tolerate digital signal processing, I guess."
Cut 'n' paste sophistry? It's not about digital or not, it's about the idea that probably 99.9% of all music is now recorded in multi-track PCM, and processed down to stereo masters in PCM, including EQ. And I suspect most DSD offerings are processed in PCM even if the masters are from tape. This just means DSD is an unnecessary step, which increases file sizes for no human audio benefit. If a given DSD recording is specifically remixed or remastered differently to the PCM version that gets issued as the retailed music, and a listener prefers the EQ etc, then I can see why people may seek out that differently sounding version, but given speakers and rooms, the variation in "end sound" can be pretty big. I think most people will believe DSD is more about marketing for higher margins.
Cut 'n' paste sophistry? It's not about digital or not, it's about the idea that probably 99.9% of all music is now recorded in multi-track PCM, and processed down to stereo masters in PCM, including EQ. And I suspect most DSD offerings are processed in PCM even if the masters are from tape. This just means DSD is an unnecessary step, which increases file sizes for no human audio benefit. If a given DSD recording is specifically remixed or remastered differently to the PCM version that gets issued as the retailed music, and a listener prefers the EQ etc, then I can see why people may seek out that differently sounding version, but given speakers and rooms, the variation in "end sound" can be pretty big. I think most people will believe DSD is more about marketing for higher margins.