Stating the very obvious but to garner a really valid opinion you need to hear two speakers in the same room at the same time, that’s what we offer here, even that is still far from a perfect solution.
Keith
Keith
ExactlyStating the very obvious but to garner a really valid opinion you need to hear two speakers in the same room at the same time, that’s what we offer here, even that is still far from a perfect solution.
Keith
Are you planning to trial Ex Machina Keith ?Stating the very obvious but to garner a really valid opinion you need to hear two speakers in the same room at the same time, that’s what we offer here, even that is still far from a perfect solution.
Keith
Thank's Keith.They don’t appear to be anything special, in fact it looks more look multiple ‘influencer‘ guerrilla hype.
Keith
I can confirm, doing this on the KH310 made dialing midrange focused stuff in much easier. Q 0.5 bell at 2khz, +1dB.Looking at the data, I think it's pretty obvious why ATC has such great mid clarity. The speaker has relatively good (not great) directivity, and the midrange is turned up 2-3dB over the rest of the spectrum. For that reason, the midrange stands out more than it does on other (more neutral speakers). You could get the same mid clarity by turning the KH310 mid dome up by 2-3dB.
^^Metallica; the band who produced the most compressed and loudest LP to win the loudness wars. Great choice!
Brad Lunde (Atc dealer) and the measure
Gearspace.com - View Single Post - Genelec 8351B vs ATC SCM45 monitors?
Post 15716477 -Forum for professional and amateur recording engineers to share techniques and advice.gearspace.com
Your "title" is misleading, there were no measurements.Brad Lunde (Atc dealer) and the measure
Gearspace.com - View Single Post - Genelec 8351B vs ATC SCM45 monitors?
Post 15716477 -Forum for professional and amateur recording engineers to share techniques and advice.gearspace.com
Is this humor?Your "title" is misleading, there were no measurements.
This x1000. Personally I was completely surprised at the level of consistency and correlation between the various measurement methods of the same loudspeaker model when I started my experiments with acoustic measurements. The agreement between sources of well executed measurements, regardless of method, is most often fantastic - especially considering that usually different units of the same model are measured.So many words.
I've seen good to great correlation between Klippel NFS measurements, 'normal' anechoic measurments, and even quasi-anechoic measurements with splicing by (capable) hobbyists. These are just words of people who want to discredit third party measurements, without actually providing anything themselves.
The hypnotic allure of that dome strikes again...SCM19 v2. Clearly a mistake, as evidenced in the harsh reception by the press: http://www.audiostereo.ro/ATC_scm19_main.html
I feel violated by ATC!
I believe Iggy won loudness wars with 1997 remix of Raw Power.^^Metallica; the band who produced the most compressed and loudest LP to win the loudness wars. Great choice!
Since they're both GLM capable, I'm wondering how audible the difference is between 8351A and 8351B above 120 Hz?A poll on GS, actually its a nice surpriseView attachment 164608
Really? How many great sounding major label releases were mixed on Nasty 10s (NS-10s)? Probably more than any other speaker.Short answer: they measure poorly, which makes them unsuitable for use as monitors (a monitor needs to give you the truth).
Did you mean 8361A and 8351B?Since they're both GLM capable, I'm wondering how audible the difference is between 8351A and 8351B above 120 Hz?