To be honest I don't have an issue with honest snobbery (noting that inverse snobbery is also snobbery). If people enjoy spending $$$$$$$$$$$$s on stuff that's their choice. What I object to is claiming it is all about better sound, when good sound quality was commoditised years ago. Spending $$$$$$$s on the basis of build quality, industrial design, feature set and well, hell, I just like it, is fair enough. I've done that many times in my life and see nothing wrong with it. What annoys me is trying to justify it on the basis of golden eared subjective claims to better performance. And sneering at those who opt out of it all annoys me (though I also don't especially like the inverse of sneering at people simply because they spend a lot either, at the end of the day we're all free to make our choices). It really is no different in other hobbies, although audio is a little different to other hobbies I am familiar with in the extents of some of the craziness (cables, cable lifters, magic rocks etc). I find that in most hobbies those whose passion is genuinely grounded in the hobby tend to be pretty open minded and do not just chase 'more expensivest = bestest' or promote 'anything costing more than $100 is idiocy'. I am into watches, I have several pretty pricey watches and one which most would consider utterly stupid (a 50 fathoms), but I also have G-Shock, Vostok Amphibia, Seagull 63, old Strela etc watches which are hardly expensive and which I love just as much as my more expensive items. Live and let live, but be honest about things, if people like nice things then there's nothing wrong with that, nor just valuing good performance for minimum cost.