Can someone do comparison between other brands and models? Is there any sound demo of the soeakers?
AsciLabs are highly well-engineered speakers that hit technical targets. In that sense they are like those from Neumann, Genelec Ones, Dutch & Dutch, Kii, certain JBL speakers, and some others. It's not important to list all of the contenders. All have radiation patterns aiming towards constant directivity. All have relatively flat on-axis sound, with few resonances and low distortion. There will be importsnt differences in how much output each speaker can produce cleanly, which is a good place to start on picking speakers, outside of more mundane and simple stuff like active vs. passive and size and aesthetic choices which matter just as much. I'll leave that to you.
The main audible differences will be to do with energy distribution in the radiation patterns. Exactly what these differences mean for what you end up hearing I can't say. We haven't yet learned to interpret data in that level of detail. I can just tell you how to look at the data we have. And, remember, in this category of speakers, they sound similar to each other in broad strokes.
Take the A6B and then extrapolate to other Ascilab models or other brands as necessary.
These are such excellent speakers that I am going to skip the spinorama plot. Some may find it better because it features certain precise averages of curves that are really useful if you understand the context and background. But if you aren't familiar then it will take a long time to explain the general principles. I think the most revealing and intuitive presentation of the measurements is in the horizontal contour plot (also called a polar map) normalized to on-axis.
www.spinorama.org
The first question concerns the width and evenness of the pattern. Using the -6dB off-axis trace, it's about 60 degrees to either side. -6dB is a useful figure because it's where the sound drops to half the strength of the on-axis sound. This will determine how much the speakers will illuminate your room, metaphorically speaking. The wider the pattern, the more room involvement, the more envelopment. There seems to be a tradeoff between envelopment and imaging precision. I think 50-60 degrees is a nice medium. Below that the sound becomes more beamlike, above that more diffuse.
The second is how low the pattern control extends. For the A6B, at around 760Hz, it flares to 110 degrees before becoming omnidirectional at 400Hz. This is probably the biggest differentiator of nominally similar speakers. Smaller ones flare in the low 1kHz region. Bigger ones flare in the low hundreds of hertz. ****** speakers have uneven patterns and random resonances that are usually omnidirectional or much wider than the controlled portion of the pattern. Cardioid speakers use acoustical summation to create controlled patterns that otherwise only large speakers show.
The third is the least interpretable. It is to do with each trace, designated in 3dB steps, and the trends over angle. This shows a low of controlled chaos and small differences between each speaker. It's not very productive to focus on this stuff, I find. The AsciLab speakers show a slight increase in width around 10kHz, and more energy in 8-10kHz and 15-20kHz. What that means I can't say. You can go on in this manner, finding differences in various frequency ranges. It's not helpful beyond identifying engineering priorities. I think we need some very strictly controlled listening comparisons by competent people with a lot of the top contending speakers in the same room to figure this out for sure. Ideally in an experimental setting, but if not that formal then a good attempt aiming at that.
The vertical version of the same shows that the Ascilabs are in a rare group of non-coaxial speakers with optimized response. The cancellations are not very significant, and the area of even coverage is fairly wide.
Here's a comparison with the Genelec S360A, which is otherwise excellent.
www.spinorama.org