And just to be clear, I'm not trying to dump on this speaker. It seems really amazing. If I could order it from Crutchfield, I'd probably have a pair right now, because I don't listen at high volume levels, I'm in the market for speakers and these look really good.
But it so often seems that reviews get a bit overly excited about some products and just barely toss in the negative points or add small qualifiers that are easy to miss. I'd love to survey the average person that reads or watches a review and find out what they take away from them.
Hopefully, years from now this will be the go to reference that Revel is now, when people recommend speakers; but I've just seen so many come and go as being giant killers. The internet has really spawned a flavor of the moment feeling to a lot of products, both good and bad, there is just a short attention span.
I'm a big fan of Joe N Tell's leader board because it shows where each speaker fits into the grouping of all he has reviewed. You can clearly see what he thinks is better out of all the ones he's reviewed. Although I'm not sure how a speaker can be 'best overall, regardless of price' and yet come in second as 'best under $2500' (I guess the sound is good but since it needs a sub it is lower?). And Zero Fidelity (yeah, I know he hears differences in RCA cables) has a decent length section of caveats at the end of his reviews where he clearly lays out any place the speaker is lacking.