Really, so is Ascilabs going to offer an "upgrade" path for anyone buying the passives to change to actives at a latter point in time?
If I am planning to use subs, is it still worth it to get the A6B? Or the C5B/C6B would be more than enough?
Also, in reading through the 38 pages, I seemed to have missed the explanation on the A6B Passive being actually Active and the cost to do so. Is there a plan to swap that plate with the Hypex based amp plate at a later time? Additional cost?
Welcome at ASR. You made VERY clear, that you are allergic against latency that might come with active monitors. "Might" because there are still active monitors out there without DSP and strictly analog amplification, which avoid latency problems.I just discovered this brand because i was looking for an Amphion One or Telegrapher alternative.
I am strictly interested in fully analog studio monitors because i don't want any dsp-inducted latency at all.
If i would do only mixing duties with these monitors i would't mind about latency, but i want a pair of speakers that can be used also for live playing/recording/tracking, therefore i don't want a "near zero" latency dsp studio monitor, I WANT A ZERO LATENCY STUDIO MONITOR, and i don't give a s** if a few ms of latency are almost impossible to hear, i don't want any f** latency when i'm playing or tracking and this is it.
It would be good to have an Ascilab-made amp for the A6B Passive, an amp aimed for studio purpose and obviously without DSP to stay in the "full analog" uncrowded segment of studio monitors (even more uncrowded if we talk about only nearfield options that aren't cheap crap).
Thanks for you to have interesting about us.i’m not allergic to active monitors, as i said i don’t want dsp equipped studio monitors for playing/recording/tracking just because i don’t want latency at all when i make these duties. And in fact the studio options are quite limited when we talk about only full analog (active or passive doesn’t matter) and possibly sealed or with passive radiator.
Would be good to have an Ascilab-made amp fully analog and aimed for studio just because i don’t know many amp options strictly studio oriented, i see many audiophile oriented manufacturers, therefore would be good to see a fully analog amp specifically made to use in pair with the Ascilab speakers, or at least knowing a couple of brands directly endorsed by Ascilab for a full analog amp for studio purposes.
i’m not allergic to active monitors, as i said i don’t want dsp equipped studio monitors for playing/recording/tracking just because i don’t want latency at all when i make these duties. And in fact the studio options are quite limited when we talk about only full analog (active or passive doesn’t matter) and possibly sealed or with passive radiator.
Would be good to have an Ascilab-made amp fully analog and aimed for studio just because i don’t know many amp options strictly studio oriented, i see many audiophile oriented manufacturers, therefore would be good to see a fully analog amp specifically made to use in pair with the Ascilab speakers, or at least knowing a couple of brands directly endorsed by Ascilab for a full analog amp for studio purposes.
Personally wondering, why don’t you regard ported? Only looking for PR or sealed type enclosure?First thank you @AsciLab for your reply.
Ascilab wrote 1ms latency when used in minimum phase configuration, wether analog or digital input is to be determined, but it doesn’t matter anyways, <1ms in minimum phase is pretty normal, it is with linear phase configuration that latency arises, but that’s not my point anyways, my point is having zero latency at all = therefore a fully analog monitor system possibly sealed or with passive radiators. if i wanted a dsp equipped studio speaker with minimum latency there are already plenty of other options i would consider, instead i can’t say the same thing for fully analog studio system sealed or PR
First thank you @AsciLab for your reply.
Ascilab wrote 1ms latency when used in minimum phase configuration, wether analog or digital input is to be determined, but it doesn’t matter anyways, <1ms in minimum phase is pretty normal, it is with linear phase configuration that latency arises, but that’s not my point anyways, my point is having zero latency at all = therefore a fully analog monitor system possibly sealed or with passive radiators. if i wanted a dsp equipped studio speaker with minimum latency there are already plenty of other options i would consider, instead i can’t say the same thing for fully analog studio system sealed or PR
I agreed. 1ms is only about 34cm distance.<1ms is not pretty normal, most have several ms.
I think this is an example where you are making it difficult for yourself to find monitors without any practical reason to do so. less than 1ms latency is the same as zero for all practical purposes, and will be perfectly fine for a live recording situation.
@AsciLab @sigbergaudio Does Hypex provide the MTBF for their amps and components?
DID YOU NOT LISTEN?!!<1ms is not pretty normal, most have several ms.
I think this is an example where you are making it difficult for yourself to find monitors without any practical reason to do so. less than 1ms latency is the same as zero for all practical purposes, and will be perfectly fine for a live recording situation.
STOP WITH WELL REASONED LOGIC!I agreed. 1ms is only about 34cm distance.
If one listens speaker far from 1.5m, there are already more than 4ms latency.
Do you have the information behind a non-disclosure agreement and you cannot reveal the number or do you not have the information?I do not believe that information is public, no.