Whatever the original purpose of ASR, it has (I think unwittingly) become a marketing influencer, and is actively ridden by wave-surfers to sell product.
Don't worry: the sales model is still intact: then, now and always: good reviews in the right places shift boxes.
That being the wave-surfers' model. It's not an indictment of ASR.
One of the stated purposes of ASR is to deflate the hot air surrounding pumped-up claims justifying inflated prices. However, it's often admitted that there's little or no audible difference between quite wide-ranging technical metrics. Why, then, are people rushing to buy the handful of top-rated products in favour of the audibly-identical second-tier ones? It's not meaningfully about 'performance'.
Because that's what (some) people do: they crave the numerical best. Again, not an indictment of ASR.
Having said that, of course - it goes without saying - well designed equipment has intrinsic value. ASR has offered accurate, consistent evaluation of equipment on a previously unseen scale, and the world's a better place for it. It's also become a market-shaper with an opinion, with all the usual attendant pros and cons.
Oh dear. Is there evidence that such vast power [sic] has gone to Amir's head?
Take AsciLab: no question they're good speakers. The ingredients are good – we've been using them ourselves. The implementation is nice. I ike where they're headed. The price is not crazy when you factor in reseller margins and suchlike necessary evils. Will everyone think they 'perform' well? Probably not. Unfortunately, most buyers don't favour neutrality – otherwise a lot more studio monitors would land in living rooms.
A market report on who buys loudspeakers in 2026, and why, would be interesting. I'm not aware one exists. Do you know better?
But are those punters wrong? If a customer buys a product that has less distortion, have they made a mistake? People like imperfection – that's why Alfa Romeo has a fan base and Hyundai has a customer base.
'People like imperfection'? Huh? I doubt if you asked them what they liked in a speaker, that imperfection would be an answer.
And again: this indicts ASR how?
Sorry, but even not splitting your post your like this, I'm having trouble detecting its point.
Last edited: