Or center speakers home home theater? Or option of buy single speakers to use one as a center.Hey so @AsciLab, any in-wall designs in the cards?![]()
Last edited:
Or center speakers home home theater? Or option of buy single speakers to use one as a center.Hey so @AsciLab, any in-wall designs in the cards?![]()
C'mon, the ear/brain terminology is a little bit overstressed. "We" don't know too much about that fancy apparatus, actually. I'm a speaker designer since long, if only in DIY, but I came to certain conclusions, which I now find confirmed. At least I'm not the only one. Feels good.Speakers are always a matter of compromise. Knowing what human ears/brains are more or less sensitive to allows a speaker designer to make the best possible compromises. It also allows a prioritization of design goals to meet when given a price point to achieve.
Center speaker is in development, confirmed in this topicOr center speakers home home theater? Or option of buy single speakers to use one as a center.
www.audiosciencereview.com
I’d continue on the direction of developmental travel, what we should and hopefully will see if the continuing lowering of the crossover frequency between tweeter and midrange. There are tweeters that can cross as low as 500Hz, so if they can also do the highest frequencies without compromise then that would be win win.The reason I mentioned 350-3500 is because it is my opinion (I have no proof) that having just one driver handle the critical range and doing it extremely well, is the foundation of ATC/psiaudio/Genelec success.
- ATC50 = 350-3500
- psiaudio A25M = 400-3300
- Genelec 8361 = 320-2800
That's why I am keeping an open mind ... and eagerly watching which direction AsciLab will take for their 3-way speaker design.
.
The low crossover frequency caught my eye immediately, and I wonder how they can do that. Tweeter response doesn’t usually extend that low, especially with low distortion. What is special about their tweeter?The problem with crossing at 3500Hz even if you use a smallish midrange driver, is that the result is vertical lobing.
I honestly think that Ascilab have solved the problem by crossing at 1-1.5KHz.
Absolutely nothing, they are pretty normal but decent enough tweeters, I know the C series uses SB Acoustics, no idea about the F series.The low crossover frequency caught my eye immediately, and I wonder how they can do that. Tweeter response doesn’t usually extend that low, especially with low distortion. What is special about their tweeter?
We have to do several things to get low frequency.The low crossover frequency caught my eye immediately, and I wonder how they can do that. Tweeter response doesn’t usually extend that low, especially with low distortion. What is special about their tweeter?
Regarding the better fitting One 18 there is a test on www.soundandrecording.de. They are not even in the same ballpark....The Ascilab runs circles around it.....It's time to measure the Amphion One 15.
Near the BottomDebating between black & white with orange waveguide & black grill. Any pics of both finishes side by side for comparison?
@AsciLab i would put forward the naming for the A series as "Astral" as it means essentially the stars, so shooting for the stars or its a shooting star. Apex is good, it just sounds a little aggressive compared to the others.@MatthewS Thank you for sharing your thoughtful insights on speaker naming. I really like the naming suggestions you provided.
In addition to the S and C lines, we also have an A line.
For this line, I’m considering the name “Apex.”
The A line features a Purifi woofer and a passive radiator, and we expect it to deliver the best measured performance in the 2-way bookshelf category—second only to the Signature (S) line.
AsciLab Signature (current S-line)
AsciLab Apex (current A-line)
AsciLab Caliber (current C-line)
AsciLab Foundation (current F-line)
@AsciLab The name Apex is already used by Monitor Audio, so you may want to consider an other name.@MatthewS Thank you for sharing your thoughtful insights on speaker naming. I really like the naming suggestions you provided.
In addition to the S and C lines, we also have an A line.
For this line, I’m considering the name “Apex.”
The A line features a Purifi woofer and a passive radiator, and we expect it to deliver the best measured performance in the 2-way bookshelf category—second only to the Signature (S) line.
AsciLab Signature (current S-line)
AsciLab Apex (current A-line)
AsciLab Caliber (current C-line)
AsciLab Foundation (current F-line)
Center Channel for surround 5.1 planed?We are also planning tower models for each speaker line.
Additionally, we are preparing an expansion method using a modular bass stand.
The model naming will follow a format similar to the one you mentioned.
The rear wall is heaviest plane except baffle of that model. 1kg crossover is mounted on the rear wall. That can’t make the resonance.After looking at F6B, 2 bucks to bet F6Bs resonance is caused by the big flat piece of rear cabinet wall
That sounds very interesting, so you mechanically modify/adjust the tweeters? Hope you can write a bit more about it without being in conflict with your company know how secrets.Finally, we adjust tweeter voice coil rest position. Due to its very short voice coil length, it is very sensitive about asymmetry.
By adjusting voice coil position we can get lowest distortion of that tweeter, especially H2 around Fs. Adjusting range is 0.x mm.