If not including price
According to the measurements. The F6B will win
Kali's are active though, these are passive. Depends on what gear you already own if budget is a factor
I prefer passive: one of the considerations (a BIG one for me) is that I already own 9 (six NAD 2200's, two 2100's and one Proton D 1200 [all are bridgeable]) very good measuring and higher powered amps. (800 watts a channel into 2 ohms linear 10HZ-40KHz) is not an issue, should I ever need to do it:
Wow, we have one kilowatt of power coming out of this amp in short duration!
Response now (in green) as it should be, ruler flat to below 10 Hz, and well extending past the 40 kHz limit of this measurement.
And good enough for me signal to noise ratio:
And should one go into catastrophic failure (It happened once [since 1984] when a telephone pole transformer {on the pole next to my house at the time}) blew and one of my 2 amps (the Right channel one) that were idling at the time flashed big enough to cast a shadow that could be seen from another room 50 ft. away. Even though they were on 1500 watt USPS(s) at the time.
It was mainly the speaker relay and a few other bits that blew. The USPS that it was connected to was history. The odd thing was that the left side of the system (also on the same circuit) but on it's own USPS: nothing happened to it.
It was later determined by the power companies electrician that at least 45 amps had come down that circuit (yes, the home circuit breaker had tripped).
But I have my gear gone through every 10-15 years, technological updates may be done (as long as they do not affect the original circuit design), maybe newer (better??) caps and other electronic parts may (rarely) get replaced if they are out of spec.
I also have custom (built by me) pair subs that each run on a bridged to mono PROTON D 1200 4 Ohm circuit.
But I am not against ACTIVE speakers, just have yet come up with a use case justifying them for any system that I have.