• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Ascilab C6B Speaker Review

Rate this speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 0.9%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 10 4.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 86 38.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 127 56.4%

  • Total voters
    225

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
51,220
Likes
307,981
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests and detailed measurements of the Ascilab C6B bookshelf speaker. It costs USD $1,357 per pair inclusive of import fees. Pricing varies in other parts of the world:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker review.jpg


Important note: my other company, TestedAudio, is the sole distributor for all of Ascilab products. Indeed, C6B is by far our most popular speaker. So feel free to read my subjective comments with extreme skepticism.

The C6B shares the same everything with F6B but with an upgraded woofer. I like the white look which reminds of the iconic Yamaha studio monitors (there is a grill if you want to hide it).

This is surprisingly compact speaker yet feels quite heavy and dense. You can better see its compact dimensions from this side profile:

Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker passive radiator back review.jpg


As with F6B, we have a passive radiator.

Ascilab C6B Speaker Measurements
As usual, we start with our anechoic measurements:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker anechoic frequency response measurement.png

We have slightly flatter response before the step function but otherwise, it is in the same ballpark as F6B.

Early window is good but shows a small dip:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker early window frequency response measurement.png


We can see that is caused by vertical reflections:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker earlyl window vertical horizontal frequency respons...png
\
You can see how the vertical response is compressed in the 3-D balloon visualization. As with most speakers, absorbing floor reflections with a carpet is advised if you want more perfection.

Horizontal is perfect which is the important bit as it means side wall reflections which can be beneficial have similar tonality to on axis.

Predicted in-room response shows more of a tilted down response indicating a warm sound signature:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker predicted in-room frequency response measurement.png


Woofer response is a bit more refined compared to F6B:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker driver frequency response measurement.png


Let's jump into distortion because that is what is unique here with respect to woofer upgrade. I will start with a comparison against F6B:

Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker relative THD distortion compared vs F6B measurement.png


We see substantial reduction of distortion in upper bass and midrange relative to lower cost woofer used in F6B. However, there is an increase in distortion at very low bass frequencies. I don't know why that is the case but overall, this is an excellent improvement over F6B.

Here is our standard graphs:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker relative THD distortion measurement.png

Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker THD distortion measurement.png


And our bass response in both linear and log scales:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker bass distortion measurement.png


You can see how the 101 dBSPL is not usable given its massive distortion. Woofer distorted some but it was the passive radiator that bitterly complained. I heard a bit of distortion at the start of the sweep at 96 dBSPL and we see the reason for that: non-linear rise in distortion below 42 Hz. This is very typical even in larger speakers.

Directivity is highly controlled and beautifully smooth once it takes hold:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker horizontal beam width measurement.png

Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker horizontal directivity measurement.png


Vertical directivity allows a bit of freedom to sit above tweeter axis:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker vertical directivity measurement.png


Someone asked for Group Delay:
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker anechoic group delay measurement.png


And rest of the bits (yes, I am tired at 1:42am):
Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker waterfall measurement.png

Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker step response measurement.png


Ascilab C6B Speaker Listening Tests
The first impression is that of warmth: there is enough bass there that you don't wish you had a subwoofer. High frequencies are clear but not piercing/standing out. Sibilance, unless in the source, is not in the C6B's vocabulary.

Throwing my torture deep-bass track at the C6B, there was distortion at anything above modest levels in that region. For all of my other bass heavy tracks though, reproduction was superb. Ton of clean bass accompanying delight notes above it. Every track in my library sounded excellent.

Spatial image is limited to halo a foot or two round the speaker. This is of course due to controlled and slightly narrower than normal beam width. I listened in mono but in stereo, it is likely to have more focused imaging.

Unfortunately I don't have an F6B in stock to compare, nor is my memory of that with me. So rely on the measurements for that.

Conclusions
One of the best driving experiences I have is that of a Honda Accord circa early 1980s. That thing had such a smooth engine and low effort stick shift that put a smile on my face that you could not wipe out. It was no sports car but it was so competent for everyday driving. Such is the story with C6B. It is just full range enough, and accurate enough to just do the job. That is, do justice to your music making you want to delight in what you are hearing. If you don't want to go all out and spend a lot more money, then the C6B is a wonderful answer. Pair with a few hundred dollar amp and some EQ and you are good to go.

I am going to recommend the Ascilab C6B speaker.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

  • Ascilab C6B.zip
    Ascilab C6B.zip
    61.3 KB · Views: 67
  • Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker driver frequency response measurement.png
    Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker driver frequency response measurement.png
    26.5 KB · Views: 2,380
  • Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker THD distortion measurement.png
    Ascilab C6B bookshelf hi fi stereo speaker THD distortion measurement.png
    79.1 KB · Views: 2,355
Last edited:
AI generated objective comparison to F6B as I post in another review:

MetricBetter directionC6BF6BAdvantage
NBD_ON (smaller is better)0.3000.271F6B
NBD_LW (smaller is better)0.2910.264F6B
NBD_SP (smaller is better)0.2560.263C6B
NBD_PIR (smaller is better)0.2400.242C6B
SM_PIR (larger is better)0.9390.944F6B
SM_SP (larger is better)0.9480.954F6B
LFX (smaller is better)39.6 Hz41.0 HzC6B
AAD_ON (smaller is better)0.684 dB0.465 dBF6B
Olive Preference Score (larger is better)6.526.53essentially tied
Preference + subwoofer (larger is better)8.408.47F6B

The important point was that the raw Olive scores were virtually identical: 6.52 vs. 6.53. The F6B had the cleaner on-axis response by NBD/AAD measures, while the C6B had slightly better bass extension and marginally better PIR NBD.

The four variables actually used in the original Olive regression were NBD_ON, NBD_PIR, LFX, and SM_PIR. Their approximate relative weights in the paper were 31.5%, 20.5%, 30.5%, and 17.5%, respectively.
 
Best passive speaker I've ever owned, eagerly awaiting their center channel offerings so I can complete my home theater setup. And the C8T towers too!
 
We're pretty much on the same page as Erin :) Great speakers.
The C6B models are essentially F6B units featuring aluminum-ceramic cone woofers with cast-aluminum chassis, offering lower distortion.

For the tweeters : the C6B features an aluminum-ceramic dome tweeter, whereas the F6B uses a standard aluminum dome tweeter


Spinorama :

 
Last edited:
We have slightly flatter response before the step function but otherwise, it is in the same ballpark as F6B.
This 2dB step >7kHz on axis, could it be a reason of "warmer" tonality?
 
This is a review, listening tests and detailed measurements of the Ascilab C6B bookshelf speaker. It costs USD $1,357 per pair inclusive of import fees. Pricing varies in other parts of the world:
View attachment 550638

Important note: my other company, TestedAudio, is the sole distributor for all of Ascilab products. Indeed, C6B is by far our most popular speaker. So feel free to read my subjective comments with extreme skepticism.

The C6B shares the same everything with F6B but with an upgraded woofer. I like the white look which reminds of the iconic Yamaha studio monitors (there is a grill if you want to hide it).

This is surprisingly compact speaker yet feels quite heavy and dense. You can better see its compact dimensions from this side profile:

View attachment 550646

As with F6B, we have a passive radiator.

Ascilab C6B Speaker Measurements
As usual, we start with our anechoic measurements:
View attachment 550647
We have slightly flatter response before the step function but otherwise, it is in the same ballpark as F6B.

Early window is good but shows a small dip:
View attachment 550650

We can see that is caused by vertical reflections:
View attachment 550651\
You can see how the vertical response is compressed in the 3-D balloon visualization. As with most speakers, absorbing floor reflections with a carpet is advised if you want more perfection.

Horizontal is perfect which is the important bit as it means side wall reflections which can be beneficial have similar tonality to on axis.

Predicted in-room response shows more of a tilted down response indicating a warm sound signature:
View attachment 550652

Woofer response is a bit more refined compared to F6B (should say F6B)
View attachment 550663

Let's jump into distortion because that is what is unique here with respect to woofer upgrade. I will start with a comparison against F6B:

View attachment 550653

We see substantial reduction of distortion in upper bass and midrange relative to lower cost woofer used in F6B. However, there is an increase in distortion at very low bass frequencies. I don't know why that is the case but overall, this is an excellent improvement over F6B.

Here is our standard graphs:
View attachment 550655
View attachment 550656

And our bass response in both linear and log scales:
View attachment 550657

You can see how the 101 dBSPL is not usable given its massive distortion. Woofer distorted some but it was the passive radiator that bitterly complained. I heard a bit of distortion at the start of the sweep at 96 dBSPL and we see the reason for that: non-linear rise in distortion below 42 Hz.

Directivity is highly controlled and beautifully smooth once it takes hold:
View attachment 550658
View attachment 550659

Vertical directivity allows a bit of freedom to sit above tweeter axis:
View attachment 550660

Someone asked for Group Delay:
View attachment 550664

And rest of the bits (yes, I am tired at 1:42am):
View attachment 550666
View attachment 550667

Ascilab C6B Speaker Listening Tests
The first impression is that of warmth: there is enough bass there that you don't wish you had a subwoofer. High frequencies are clear but not piercing/standing out. Sibilance, unless in the source, is not in the C6B's vocabulary.

Throwing my torture deep-bass track at the C6B, there was distortion at anything above modest levels in that region. For all of my other bass heavy tracks though, reproduction was superb. Ton of clean bass accompanying delight notes above it. Every track in my library sounded excellent.

Spatial image is limited to halo a foot or two round the speaker. This is of course due to controlled and slightly narrower than normal beam width. I listened in mono but in stereo, it is likely to have more focused imaging.

Unfortunately I don't have an F6B in stock to compare, nor is my memory of that with me. So rely on the measurements for that.

Conclusions
One of the best driving experiences I have is that of a Honda Accord circa early 1980s. That thing had such a smooth engine and low effort stick shift that put a smile on my face that you could not wipe out. It was no sports car but it was so competent for everyday driving. Such is the story with C6B. It is just full range enough, and accurate enough to just do the job. That is, do justice to your music making you want to delight in what you are hearing. If you don't want to go all out and spend a lot more money, then the C6B is a wonderful answer. Pair with a few hundred dollar amp and some EQ and you are good to go.

I am going to recommend the Ascilab C6B speaker.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
I have the feeling that this might be a stupid question, but what do the "C" and "F" stand for?
 
Here is my take on the EQ.
Please report your findings, positive or negative!

For the score rational your journey starts here
Explanation for the sub score

The following EQs are “anechoic” EQs to get the speaker right before room integration.
If you able to implement these EQs you must add EQ at LF for room integration, that is usually not optional… see hints there.

The raw data with corrected ER and PIR:

Score no EQ: 6.5
With Sub: 8.4

Spinorama with no EQ:
  • Good directivity
  • Descending LW
Ascilab C6B APO No EQ Spinorama.png



Directivity:
Better stay at tweeter height
Horizontally, better toe-in the speakers by 10/15deg and have the axis crossing in front of the listening location, might help dosing the upper range. Explanation here.
Ascilab C6B LW data.png

Ascilab C6B 2D surface Directivity Contour Only Data.png



EQ design:
I have generated two EQs. The APO config files are attached.
  • The first one, labelled, LW is targeted at making the LW flat
  • The second, labelled Score, starts with the first one and adds the score as an optimization variable (here).
  • The EQs are designed in the context of regular stereo use i.e. domestic environment, no warranty is provided for a near field use in a studio environment although the LW might be better suited for this purpose.
  • One can model the EQ with Vituixcad by using the DSP "Generic" setting with 96000Hz sampling rate.
Quite an interesting case.
The LW EQ and No EQ scores are very close but the curves are rather different!
The tonal balance might be quite difference too...

Score no EQ: 6.5
With Sub: 8.4

Score EQ LW: 6.5
with sub: 8.3

Score EQ Score: 6.9
with sub: 8.7


Code:
Ascilab C6B APO LW EQ 96000Hz
August102026-192116

Preamp: -4.00 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 36.3 Hz Gain 0.00 dB Q 1.19
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 113.0 Hz Gain -0.75 dB Q 1.78
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 346.7 Hz Gain -1.43 dB Q 1.03
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 711.5 Hz Gain -2.18 dB Q 4.63
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 673.4 Hz Gain 2.07 dB Q 1.35
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2469.8 Hz Gain 1.39 dB Q 1.19
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 9702.2 Hz Gain 2.38 dB Q 0.59
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 13851.2 Hz Gain 1.98 dB Q 1.73

Ascilab C6B APO Score EQ 96000Hz
August102026-192116

Preamp: -3.10 dB

Filter 1: ON HPQ Fc 36.3 Hz Gain 0.00 dB Q 1.19
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 114.9 Hz Gain -0.76 dB Q 1.74
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 391.7 Hz Gain -1.91 dB Q 0.89
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 699.5 Hz Gain -2.18 dB Q 3.97
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 651.5 Hz Gain 2.89 dB Q 1.25
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 2163.7 Hz Gain 1.38 dB Q 0.91
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 7757.3 Hz Gain 1.44 dB Q 0.47
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 12446.2 Hz Gain 1.84 dB Q 1.79

Ascilab C6B APO EQ Design.png

Spinorama EQ LW
Ascilab C6B APO LW EQ Spinorama.png


Spinorama EQ Score
Ascilab C6B APO Score EQ Spinorama.png


Zoom PIR-LW-ON
Ascilab C6B APO Zoom.png


Regression - Tonal
Ascilab C6B APO Regression.png


Radar no EQ vs EQ score
No improvements?
Ascilab C6B APO Radar.png


EDIT: OCD EQ...

Score no EQ: 6.5
With Sub: 8.4

Score EQ LW: 6.5
with sub: 8.3

Score EQ Score: 6.9
with sub: 8.7

Score EQ OCD: 7.0
with sub: 8.8

Ascilab C6B APO OCD EQ Spinorama.png
 

Attachments

  • Ascilab C6B APO Score EQ 96000Hz.txt
    Ascilab C6B APO Score EQ 96000Hz.txt
    463 bytes · Views: 43
  • Ascilab C6B APO LW EQ 96000Hz.txt
    Ascilab C6B APO LW EQ 96000Hz.txt
    460 bytes · Views: 48
  • Ascilab C6B 2D surface Directivity Contour Data.png
    Ascilab C6B 2D surface Directivity Contour Data.png
    396.3 KB · Views: 59
  • Ascilab C6B 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    Ascilab C6B 3D surface Vertical Directivity Data.png
    450.2 KB · Views: 54
  • Ascilab C6B 3D surface Horizontal Directivity Data.png
    Ascilab C6B 3D surface Horizontal Directivity Data.png
    477.3 KB · Views: 50
  • Ascilab C6B Vertical 3D Directivity data.png
    Ascilab C6B Vertical 3D Directivity data.png
    501.9 KB · Views: 63
  • Ascilab C6B Horizontal 3D Directivity data.png
    Ascilab C6B Horizontal 3D Directivity data.png
    529.3 KB · Views: 55
  • Ascilab C6B Normalized Directivity data.png
    Ascilab C6B Normalized Directivity data.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 57
  • Ascilab C6B Raw Directivity data.png
    Ascilab C6B Raw Directivity data.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 61
  • Ascilab C6B Reflexion data.png
    Ascilab C6B Reflexion data.png
    769 KB · Views: 70
  • Ascilab C6B APO OCD EQ 96000Hz.txt
    Ascilab C6B APO OCD EQ 96000Hz.txt
    510 bytes · Views: 42
Last edited:
It seems to me that the distortion is quite high, especially below 100 Hz -- and above too, though I never listen at 96 dB. The price is very reasonable but that distortion would give me some pause if I were looking to buy speakers in this general category.

It seems to me the distortion is not sufficiently recognized. Great FR is nice, but minor FR deficiencies can be compensated by EQ or FIR filtering. (As I understand), FIR filters can also compensate for some time domain issues, but neither EQ nor the latter can compensated for distortion.
 
I'm very happy with my pair. They sit on a desk in an office and are fed by a Vibelink amp.

Paired with a subwoofer though. It's true they can do bass and a subwoofer is not a def. must in all situations. But better isolation than the neoprene bottom sheet would be in order. Doesn't matter when crossing over at 80Hz.

Not a big fan of white cones. I recommend the grille. Looks very nice in black on black.

From the questions-thread: the terminals are not friendly to most bananas I have. What properly fits for me is locking WBT clones.

What else is there to mention? Rather low sensitivity and an impedance dip down to 2.6 ohms (iirc). So they need a bit more power and an amp that is comfortable going a bit lower.

Sound is really good for this budget. Next pair of speakers I own that can compete with them cost double. The demand is easily understandable to me. Reviews do the rest.
 
I wish there was a sealed version of this speaker.
Although originally planned, Ascilab has since announced that there will be no sealed version:
That's why I am looking forward to the upcoming C5CTR. It's a sealed MTM design offered as a center speaker, though it presumably works well as a main speaker in a vertical orientation as well. Thanks to the larger cone area compared to the C6B, even better distortion figures can be expected. The only downside is the narrower vertical dispersion angle, though this can actually be an advantage in a dedicated stereo setup.
My question as to whether the center speaker will have a VESA mount has not yet been answered by Ascilab.
 
Back
Top Bottom